Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
Phys Ther. 2018 Aug 1;98(8):691-704. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy050.
The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health framework, Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY), provides a valuable method of conceptualizing the multidomain difficulties experienced by children born very preterm (VP). Reviews investigating motor outcomes at preschool age across ICF-CY domains are lacking.
The purpose of this review is to identify and compare motor outcomes of 3- to 6-year-old children born VP and children born full-term (FT) within the ICF-CY framework.
Four electronic databases and reference lists of included and key articles were searched.
Studies comparing motor outcomes of 3- to 6-year-old children born VP (<32 weeks' gestation or birth weight <1500 g) with peers born FT were included.
Two independent authors extracted data and completed quality assessments.
Thirty-six studies were included. Activity motor performance of children born VP was consistently poorer compared with peers born FT: standardized mean difference (SMD) was -0.71 (95% CI = -0.80 to -0.61; 14 studies, 2056 participants). Furthermore, children born VP had higher relative risk (RR) of motor impairment (RR = 3.39; 95% CI = 2.68 to 4.27; 9 studies, 3466 participants). Body structure and function outcomes were largely unable to be pooled because assessment tools varied too widely. However, children born VP had higher RR of any neurological dysfunction (Touwen Neurological Examination) (RR = 4.55; 95% CI = 1.20 to 17.17; 3 studies, 1363 participants). There were no participation outcome data.
Limitations include the lack of consistent assessment tools used in VP follow-up at preschool age and the quality of the evidence.
Children born VP experience significant motor impairment across ICF-CY activity and body structure and function domains at preschool age compared with peers born FT. Evidence investigating participation in VP preschool-age populations relative to children born at term is sparse, requiring further research.
世界卫生组织的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》儿童和青少年版(ICF-CY)为理解极早产儿(VP)所经历的多领域困难提供了有价值的方法。目前缺乏针对 ICF-CY 各领域学龄前运动结局的综述。
本综述旨在确定并比较 VP 出生儿童和足月(FT)出生儿童在 ICF-CY 框架内的 3 至 6 岁运动结局。
检索了四个电子数据库和纳入及关键文章的参考文献列表。
纳入了比较 3 至 6 岁 VP 出生儿童(<32 周龄或出生体重<1500 克)与 FT 出生同龄儿运动结局的研究。
两位独立作者提取数据并完成质量评估。
纳入了 36 项研究。VP 出生儿童的活动运动表现始终较 FT 出生儿童差:标准化均数差(SMD)为-0.71(95%CI=-0.80 至-0.61;14 项研究,2056 名参与者)。此外,VP 出生儿童运动障碍的相对风险(RR)更高(RR=3.39;95%CI=2.68 至 4.27;9 项研究,3466 名参与者)。由于评估工具差异过大,身体结构和功能结局基本无法进行汇总。然而,VP 出生儿童任何神经功能障碍(Touwen 神经检查)的 RR 更高(RR=4.55;95%CI=1.20 至 17.17;3 项研究,1363 名参与者)。没有参与结局的数据。
局限包括 VP 随访学龄前时使用的一致评估工具缺乏以及证据质量。
与 FT 出生的同龄儿相比,VP 出生儿童在 ICF-CY 活动和身体结构与功能领域存在显著的运动障碍。关于 VP 学龄前人群参与情况与足月儿的对比研究较少,需要进一步研究。