• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多站式面试中各站轮转顺序是否会影响考生表现?

Does the sequence of rotations in Multiple Mini Interview stations influence the candidates' performance?

机构信息

a Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine , Dongguk University , Goyang , South Korea.

b Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine , Dongguk University , Goyang , South Korea.

出版信息

Med Educ Online. 2018 Dec;23(1):1485433. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1485433.

DOI:10.1080/10872981.2018.1485433
PMID:29912677
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6008577/
Abstract

In Multiple Mini Interviews (MMIs), the candidates start out with different stations depending on the sequence of rotation they are assigned; thus, their perceived difficulty level and nervousness with their first station may differ. We examined whether such differences influenced the candidates' overall performance in the MMI. A 32-item questionnaire was developed and administered to candidates for admission interviews at a medical school regarding their perceptions of the MMI. Candidates' interview scores were also obtained and were compared across groups who differed in the sequence of rotation of MMI stations. Candidates felt nervous when they encountered the first station, which did not differ regardless of which station was their first encounter. Candidates were neutral regarding whether their first station was more difficult than the others and about whether its difficulty level influenced their overall performance in the test. Although candidates' perceived station difficulty differed across stations, there were no differences in their performance in each station between those it was their first station and those it was not. Candidates' total interview scores also did not differ across groups of different sequence of rotations. The MMI is a fair process as it does not give disadvantage to those who encounter a more difficult station than others for their first station.

摘要

在多站式面试(MMI)中,考生根据抽签顺序进入不同的站点;因此,他们对第一个站点的难度和紧张感可能会有所不同。我们考察了这种差异是否会影响考生在 MMI 中的整体表现。我们针对医学院的招生面试向考生发放了一份 32 项的调查问卷,以了解他们对 MMI 的看法。我们还获取了考生的面试成绩,并比较了在 MMI 站点抽签顺序不同的考生群体之间的成绩差异。考生在遇到第一个站点时会感到紧张,而无论他们遇到的第一个站点是哪个,这种紧张感都没有差异。考生对于自己的第一个站点是否比其他站点更难以及该站点的难度是否会影响他们在考试中的整体表现持中立态度。尽管考生对各个站点的难度感知存在差异,但对于那些第一个站点是某个站点的考生和那些第一个站点不是某个站点的考生,他们在每个站点的表现没有差异。考生的总分也没有因抽签顺序的不同而存在差异。MMI 是一个公平的过程,因为它不会让那些第一个站点比其他人更难的考生处于劣势。

相似文献

1
Does the sequence of rotations in Multiple Mini Interview stations influence the candidates' performance?多站式面试中各站轮转顺序是否会影响考生表现?
Med Educ Online. 2018 Dec;23(1):1485433. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1485433.
2
The utility of multiple mini-interviews: experience of a medical school.多次小型面试的效用:一所医学院的经验
Korean J Med Educ. 2017 Mar;29(1):7-14. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2017.48. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
3
Improving student selection using multiple mini-interviews with multifaceted Rasch modeling.运用多方面 Rasch 模型的多次微型面试提高学生选拔效果。
Acad Med. 2013 Feb;88(2):216-23. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827c0c5d.
4
Multiple mini-interview test characteristics: 'tis better to ask candidates to recall than to imagine.多站面试测试的特点:让考生回忆比让他们想象更好。
Med Educ. 2014 Jun;48(6):604-13. doi: 10.1111/medu.12402.
5
Past-behavioural versus situational questions in a postgraduate admissions multiple mini-interview: a reliability and acceptability comparison.研究生入学多对一迷你面试中过往行为问题与情境问题的比较:可靠性与可接受性对比
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Apr 14;15:75. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0361-y.
6
Exploring sociodemographic subgroup differences in multiple mini-interview (MMI) performance based on MMI station type and the implications for the predictive fairness of the Hamburg MMI.探讨基于多站式迷你面试(MMI)中面试站点类型的社会人口统计学亚组差异及其对汉堡 MMI 预测公平性的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 3;19(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1674-z.
7
Candidates' and interviewers' perceptions of multiple-mini interviews for admission to an occupational therapy professional program.候选人与面试官对职业治疗专业项目入学多重小型面试的看法。
Occup Ther Health Care. 2015 Apr;29(2):186-200. doi: 10.3109/07380577.2015.1012776. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
8
Effect of station format on the psychometric properties of Multiple Mini Interviews.站点格式对多项迷你面试心理测量特性的影响。
Med Educ. 2022 Oct;56(10):1042-1050. doi: 10.1111/medu.14855. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
9
Reliability and acceptability of six station multiple mini-interviews: past-behavioural versus situational questions in postgraduate medical admission.六站式多重迷你面试的可靠性与可接受性:研究生医学入学中过往行为问题与情境问题的比较
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Mar 16;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0898-z.
10
Association between a medical school admission process using the multiple mini-interview and national licensing examination scores.医学院采用多站式面试的招生程序与全国执照考试分数的关联性。
JAMA. 2012 Dec 5;308(21):2233-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.36914.

引用本文的文献

1
Employing Multiple Mini Interviews in Selection Processes for Psychology Professional Training Programs: Ten Tips for Effective Implementation.在心理学专业培训项目选拔过程中采用多次小型面试:有效实施的十点建议。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Sep 14;9:192. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000192.1. eCollection 2020.
2
Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology.用于选拔心脏病学住院医师的多重迷你面试的可靠性和可接受性。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2020 Jan;8(1):25-31. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2019.83903.1116.

本文引用的文献

1
The utility of multiple mini-interviews: experience of a medical school.多次小型面试的效用:一所医学院的经验
Korean J Med Educ. 2017 Mar;29(1):7-14. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2017.48. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
2
Impact of sociodemographic characteristics of applicants in multiple mini-interviews.多元迷你面试中申请者社会人口学特征的影响
Med Teach. 2017 Mar;39(3):285-294. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1270431. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
3
Evidence regarding the utility of multiple mini-interview (MMI) for selection to undergraduate health programs: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 37.关于多重迷你面试(MMI)在本科健康项目选拔中的效用的证据:BEME系统评价:BEME指南第37号
Med Teach. 2016 May;38(5):443-55. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1158799. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
4
Multiple mini-interviews as a predictor of academic achievements during the first 2 years of medical school.多次小型面试作为医学院校前两年学业成绩的预测指标
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Feb 13;9:93. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1866-0.
5
What does the multiple mini interview have to offer over the panel interview?与小组面试相比,多次小型面试有什么优势?
Med Educ Online. 2016 Feb 11;21:29874. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.29874. eCollection 2016.
6
Improving response rates and evaluating nonresponse bias in surveys: AMEE Guide No. 102.提高调查的回应率并评估无回应偏差:AMEE指南第102号
Med Teach. 2016;38(3):217-28. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1105945. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
7
The fairness, predictive validity and acceptability of multiple mini interview in an internationally diverse student population--a mixed methods study.多种迷你面试在国际多元化学生群体中的公平性、预测效度及可接受性——一项混合方法研究
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Dec 21;14:267. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0267-0.
8
Multiple mini-interviews: same concept, different approaches.多次小型访谈:概念相同,方法各异。
Med Educ. 2014 Dec;48(12):1157-75. doi: 10.1111/medu.12535.
9
Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales.分析和解释李克特量表的数据。
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec;5(4):541-2. doi: 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18.
10
The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) for student selection in health professions training - a systematic review.多站式面试(MMI)在卫生专业培训学生选拔中的应用 - 系统评价。
Med Teach. 2013 Dec;35(12):1027-41. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.829912. Epub 2013 Sep 20.