Strelnikov Kuzma, Collett Edward, Gaillard Pascal, Truy Eric, Déguine Olivier, Marx Mathieu, Barone Pascal
Université de Toulouse, CerCo UMR 5549 CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France; Université de Toulouse, CerCo UMR 5549 CNRS, Faculté de Médecine de Purpan, Toulouse, France; Service d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et Oto-Neurologie, Hopital Purpan Toulouse, France.
Université de Toulouse, CerCo UMR 5549 CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France; Université de Toulouse, CerCo UMR 5549 CNRS, Faculté de Médecine de Purpan, Toulouse, France; Advanced Bionics SARL, France.
Hear Res. 2018 Sep;367:182-194. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
Previous studies have demonstrated that cochlear implant (CI) patients are more efficient at performing sound categorisation than sound identification. However, it remains unclear how this categorisation capacity develops with time during the rehabilitation period after implantation. To investigate the role of the post-implantation auditory experience in the broad sound categorisation in CI patients, we recruited CI patients with different durations of CI experience: Newly implanted CI patients (less than six months), Intermediate CI patients (6-14 months) and Experienced CI patients with a duration of implantation greater than 14 months. The patients completed a Free Sorting Task (FST), which allowed them to categorise 16 natural sounds based on their own criteria. We found an early deficit in categorisation, especially for vocal sounds; the categorisation started to improve after approximately six months post-implantation with a change of categorisation strategy which relied on different acoustic cues as a function of time after CI. The separation of the category of vocal sounds from other sounds significantly increased between the Newly implanted and Intermediate groups, i.e. as experience with the cochlear implant was acquired. The categorisation accuracy of vocal sounds was significantly correlated with the post-implantation period only in the group of newly implanted CI patients. This is the first study to show that the categorisation of vocal sounds with respect to non-vocal sounds improves during the rehabilitation period post-implantation. The first six-month post-implantation period appears to be crucial in this process. Our results demonstrate that patients in different rehabilitation periods use different acoustic cues, which increase their complexity with the CI experience.
以往的研究表明,人工耳蜗(CI)植入患者在进行声音分类方面比声音识别更有效。然而,目前尚不清楚这种分类能力在植入后的康复期是如何随时间发展的。为了研究植入后听觉经验在CI患者广泛声音分类中的作用,我们招募了具有不同CI经验时长的CI患者:新植入CI患者(少于6个月)、中度CI患者(6 - 14个月)和植入时长大于14个月的经验丰富的CI患者。患者完成了一项自由分类任务(FST),该任务允许他们根据自己的标准对16种自然声音进行分类。我们发现分类存在早期缺陷,尤其是对于语音声音;植入后大约六个月后,分类开始改善,分类策略发生了变化,该策略根据CI后的时间依赖于不同的声学线索。在新植入组和中度组之间,语音声音类别与其他声音类别的分离显著增加,即随着人工耳蜗植入经验的获得。仅在新植入CI患者组中,语音声音的分类准确性与植入后时期显著相关。这是第一项表明植入后康复期内语音声音相对于非语音声音的分类有所改善的研究。植入后的前六个月似乎在这个过程中至关重要。我们的结果表明,处于不同康复期的患者使用不同的声学线索,这些线索随着CI经验的增加而变得更加复杂。