Suppr超能文献

全髋关节置换术作为门诊手术的安全性和有效性评估:一项匹配队列分析。

An Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Total Hip Arthroplasty as an Outpatient Procedure: A Matched-Cohort Analysis.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2018 Oct;33(10):3206-3210. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.036. Epub 2018 May 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Outpatient hip arthroplasty is being performed more routinely; however, safety remains a concern. The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of adverse events of outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) and assess barriers to discharge.

METHODS

We examined 136 patients who underwent unilateral THA by one surgeon and were discharged on the same day of surgery. Using propensity matching, 136 inpatients who received the same procedure, and were discharged on postoperative day one or later, were identified. For each cohort, 90-day occurrence of adverse events, readmissions, and emergency visits were recorded and compared. Adverse events were graded using the OrthoSAVES tool. A secondary objective was to assess potential barriers to same-day discharge.

RESULTS

Within 90 days postoperatively, 12 outpatients (8.82%) and 14 inpatients (10.29%) developed an adverse event. There were no significant differences between the rate or severity of adverse events between the 2 groups and no serious adverse events in either group. In the outpatient group, there was a correlation between the dosage of spinal anesthetic (bupivacaine) given and time required to stay in postanesthetic care unit postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

When comparing the 2 groups, there were no differences in adverse events at 90 days. At our center, in the appropriate patient population, outpatient THA is a safe and cost-effective option. A potential barrier to mobility postoperatively and successful same-day discharge is the time required to stay in postanesthetic care unit postoperatively, which was significantly correlated with an increased dose of spinal anesthetic given in our outpatient cohort.

摘要

背景

门诊髋关节置换术的应用越来越普遍,但安全性仍是一个关注点。本研究旨在比较门诊全髋关节置换术(THA)的不良事件发生率,并评估出院障碍。

方法

我们检查了由一位外科医生进行的 136 例单侧 THA 患者,这些患者在同一天接受手术并出院。通过倾向评分匹配,确定了 136 例接受相同手术并在术后第 1 天或更晚出院的住院患者。记录并比较了每个队列在 90 天内的不良事件、再入院和急诊就诊的发生率。使用 OrthoSAVES 工具对不良事件进行分级。次要目标是评估当日出院的潜在障碍。

结果

术后 90 天内,12 例门诊患者(8.82%)和 14 例住院患者(10.29%)发生不良事件。两组之间不良事件的发生率或严重程度无显著差异,且两组均无严重不良事件。在门诊组中,术后在麻醉后护理单元停留时间与接受的脊髓麻醉(布比卡因)剂量之间存在相关性。

结论

在比较两组时,90 天内的不良事件无差异。在我们中心,对于合适的患者人群,门诊 THA 是一种安全且具有成本效益的选择。术后活动能力和成功当日出院的潜在障碍是术后在麻醉后护理单元停留的时间,这与我们门诊队列中给予的脊髓麻醉剂量增加显著相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验