Suppr超能文献

累及前柱并四边形板破坏的髋臼骨折固定技术的比较:一项生物力学研究。

Comparison of Fixation Techniques for Acetabular Fractures Involving the Anterior Column with Disruption of the Quadrilateral Plate: A Biomechanical Study.

机构信息

RMS Foundation, Bettlach, Switzerland.

Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jun 20;100(12):1047-1054. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00295.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In elderly patients who have sustained an acetabular fracture involving disruption of the quadrilateral plate (QLP), postoperative loading of the joint beyond the level of partial weight-bearing can result in medial redisplacement of the QLP. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to compare the performances of 4 different fixation constructs intended to prevent medial redisplacement of the QLP.

METHODS

Anterior column posterior hemitransverse (ACPHT) fractures with disruption of the QLP were created on synthetic hemipelves (fourth-generation Sawbones models) and subsequently stabilized with (1) a 12-hole plate bridging the QLP (Group 1), (2) the plate with added periarticular screws along the QLP (Group 2), (3) the plate combined with an infrapectineal buttress plate (Group 3), or (4) the plate with the added periarticular screws as well as the buttress plate (Group 4). The point of load application on the acetabulum was defined to be the same as the point of application of maximum vertical hip contact force during normal walking. Loads were applied to simulate either partial weight-bearing (20 cycles, from 35 to 350 N) or inadvertent supraphysiologic loads (linearly increasing loads until the onset of failure, defined as fragment displacement of >3 mm). A universal testing machine was synchronized with a digital image correlation system to optically track redisplacement at the QLP. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

During experimental simulation of partial weight-bearing, maximum fracture step openings never exceeded 2 mm. During simulation of inadvertent supraphysiologic load, the median load to failure was higher (p < 0.05) in Group 2 (962 N; range, 798 to 1,000 N) and Group 4 (985 N; range, 887 to 1,000 N) compared with Group 1 (445 N; range, 377 to 583 N) and Group 3 (671 N; range, 447 to 720 N).

CONCLUSIONS

All 4 fixation constructs performed in an acceptable manner on testing with simulated partial weight-bearing. Only additional periarticular screws along the QLP increased the fixation strength.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Redisplacement of the QLP resulting in an incongruency of the hip joint has been associated with poor long-term outcomes. Within the constraints of this study, periarticular long screws were superior to infrapectineal buttress plates in preventing medial redisplacement of the QLP.

摘要

背景

对于老年髋臼骨折患者,骨折累及四边形板(QLP)并发生中断,关节在部分负重水平以上负重可能导致 QLP 内侧再移位。本生物力学研究的目的是比较 4 种不同固定结构的性能,以防止 QLP 的内侧再移位。

方法

在合成半骨盆(第四代 Sawbones 模型)上制造前柱后横(ACPHT)骨折并伴有 QLP 中断,随后用(1)桥接 QLP 的 12 孔板(1 组),(2)沿 QLP 附加关节周围螺钉的板(2 组),(3)板与 infrapectineal 支撑板结合(3 组),或(4)附加关节周围螺钉和支撑板的板(4 组)固定。髋臼上的加载点定义为与正常行走时最大垂直髋关节接触力的应用点相同。施加载荷以模拟部分负重(20 个循环,从 35 到 350 N)或意外超生理载荷(线性增加载荷直至失效开始,定义为碎片位移> 3 毫米)。万能试验机与数字图像相关系统同步,以光学方式跟踪 QLP 处的再移位。显著性水平设为 p < 0.05。

结果

在部分负重的实验模拟过程中,最大骨折步距开口从未超过 2 毫米。在意外超生理负荷模拟过程中,与第 1 组(445 N;范围,377 至 583 N)和第 3 组(671 N;范围,447 至 720 N)相比,第 2 组(962 N;范围,798 至 1000 N)和第 4 组(985 N;范围,887 至 1000 N)的中位失效载荷更高(p < 0.05)。

结论

所有 4 种固定结构在模拟部分负重的测试中表现良好。只有沿 QLP 附加关节周围螺钉增加了固定强度。

临床相关性

导致髋关节不匹配的 QLP 再移位与不良的长期结果有关。在本研究的限制范围内,关节周围长螺钉在防止 QLP 内侧再移位方面优于 infrapectineal 支撑板。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验