• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

审视美国国立卫生研究院参与研究及获得资助的工作人员的多样性趋势。

Examining trends in the diversity of the U.S. National Institutes of Health participating and funded workforce.

作者信息

Nikaj Silda, Roychowdhury Deepshikha, Lund P Kay, Matthews Marguerite, Pearson Katrina

机构信息

Office of Extramural Research, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

FASEB J. 2018 Jun 19:fj201800639. doi: 10.1096/fj.201800639.

DOI:10.1096/fj.201800639
PMID:29920223
Abstract

Here, we use recent U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) data to document trends in the NIH-funded workforce over time. Consistent with previous studies that were initiated by NIH, we find that the number of scientists funded on competing R01-equivalent (R01 Eq.) and research project grants (RPGs) increased 2-5% per year between 2009 and 2016. Primary beneficiaries of this growth were experienced investigators (Exp), whereas the share of funding awarded to early-stage investigators (ESIs) and new investigators (NIs) declined. The decline occurred even after NIH instituted the New and Early-Stage Investigator policy in 2009. When we evaluate the investigator pool, we find that women and racial and ethnic minorities represent a higher percentage of NIs and ESIs relative to Exp. Thus, trends of diminishing support for NIs and ESIs may negatively impact the diversity of the current and future biomedical research workforce. We find some recent gains among women and Hispanics as part of the applicant and awardee pool for both R01 Eq. and RPGs, but significant, large gaps persist among nationally underrepresented racial minorities. Our findings suggest a need to prioritize investments and support of ESIs and NIs, groups in which women and racial and ethnic minorities represent a larger proportion of the applicant pool, to enhance diversity in the NIH-funded workforce.-Nikaj, S., Roychowdhury, D., Lund, P. K., Matthews, M., Pearson, K. Examining trends in the diversity of the U.S. National Institutes of Health participating and funded workforce.

摘要

在此,我们使用美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的最新数据来记录NIH资助的研究人员队伍随时间的变化趋势。与NIH之前开展的研究一致,我们发现,在2009年至2016年期间,获得相当于竞争性R01(R01 Eq.)资助及研究项目资助(RPG)的科学家数量每年增长2%至5%。这一增长的主要受益者是经验丰富的研究人员(Exp),而给予早期研究人员(ESI)和新研究人员(NI)的资助份额有所下降。即便NIH在2009年制定了针对新研究人员和早期研究人员的政策,这种下降仍在发生。当我们评估研究人员群体时,我们发现,相对于经验丰富的研究人员,女性以及少数族裔在新研究人员和早期研究人员中所占的比例更高。因此,对新研究人员和早期研究人员支持减少的趋势可能会对当前及未来生物医学研究人员队伍的多样性产生负面影响。我们发现,作为R01 Eq.和RPG的申请人及受资助者群体的一部分,女性和西班牙裔最近有所增加,但在全国代表性不足的少数族裔之间,仍然存在巨大差距。我们的研究结果表明,有必要优先投资并支持早期研究人员和新研究人员,在这些群体中,女性以及少数族裔在申请人中所占比例更大,以增强NIH资助的研究人员队伍的多样性。——尼卡伊,S.,罗伊乔杜里,D.,伦德,P.K.,马修斯,M.,皮尔逊,K. 审视美国国立卫生研究院参与及受资助研究人员队伍的多样性趋势

相似文献

1
Examining trends in the diversity of the U.S. National Institutes of Health participating and funded workforce.审视美国国立卫生研究院参与研究及获得资助的工作人员的多样性趋势。
FASEB J. 2018 Jun 19:fj201800639. doi: 10.1096/fj.201800639.
2
Measuring Diversity of the National Institutes of Health-Funded Workforce.衡量美国国立卫生研究院资助的劳动力多样性。
Acad Med. 2016 Aug;91(8):1164-72. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001209.
3
Gender, Racial, and Ethnic and Inequities in Receipt of Multiple National Institutes of Health Research Project Grants.性别、种族和民族在获得多项美国国立卫生研究院研究项目资助方面的不平等现象。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e230855. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0855.
4
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop Summary: Enhancing Opportunities for Training and Retention of a Diverse Biomedical Workforce.美国国立心肺血液研究所研讨会总结:增加培训机会并留住多元化生物医学人才队伍。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Apr;13(4):562-7. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-624OT.
5
Trends in National Institutes of Health Funding of Principal Investigators in Dermatology Research by Academic Degree and Sex.按学术学位和性别划分的皮肤科研究首席研究员 NIH 资助趋势。
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Aug 1;152(8):883-8. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0271.
6
Current Status of National Institutes of Health Research Funding for Women Surgeon-Scientists.女性外科医生科学家获得美国国立卫生研究院研究经费的现状。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Dec 1;157(12):1134-1140. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.5157.
7
Gender Disparity in Grants and Awards at the National Institute of Health.美国国立卫生研究院资助与奖项中的性别差异。
Cureus. 2021 Apr 23;13(4):e14644. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14644.
8
Gender Differences in Research Project Grants and R01 Grants at the National Institutes of Health.美国国立卫生研究院研究项目资助和R01资助中的性别差异。
Cureus. 2021 May 10;13(5):e14930. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14930.
9
NIH funding trends for neurosurgeon-scientists from 1993-2017: Biomedical workforce implications for neurooncology.1993-2017 年神经外科医师科学家的 NIH 资助趋势:神经肿瘤学对生物医学劳动力的影响。
J Neurooncol. 2021 Aug;154(1):51-62. doi: 10.1007/s11060-021-03797-5. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
10
Perspectives on National Institutes of Health Funding Requirements for Racial and Ethnic Diversity Among Medical Scientist Training Program Leadership.医学科学家培训计划领导层中种族和民族多样性的 NIH 资金要求的观点。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2310795. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10795.

引用本文的文献

1
Ten simple rules for being a co-author on a many-author non-empirical paper.成为多作者非实证性论文共同作者的十条简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Aug 14;21(8):e1013317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013317. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Ten simple rules for leading a many-author non-empirical paper.撰写多作者非实证性论文的十条简明规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Aug 14;21(8):e1013283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013283. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Composing authorship teams for health equity: an introduction to the health equity research production model.
组建促进健康公平的作者团队:健康公平研究产出模式介绍
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jun 12;24(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02524-0.
4
Characteristics and Trends of NIH-Funded Opioid Use Disorder Clinical Trials During the Opioid Epidemic With a Focus on Gender.阿片类药物流行期间美国国立卫生研究院资助的阿片类药物使用障碍临床试验的特征与趋势:以性别为重点
Cureus. 2025 Apr 14;17(4):e82227. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82227. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Increasing diversity in the nutrition, obesity, and diabetes biomedical workforce: the BRIDGES consortium.增加营养、肥胖和糖尿病生物医学领域劳动力的多样性:BRIDGES联盟。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 Feb;121(2):265-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.12.011. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
6
Supporting students from underrepresented minority backgrounds in graduate school: A mixed-methods formative study to inform post-baccalaureate design.支持来自少数族裔背景的学生攻读研究生:一项混合方法形成性研究,为本科后设计提供信息。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Sep 16;8(1):e124. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.590. eCollection 2024.
7
Increasing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in Rare Disease Clinical Trials.提高罕见病临床试验中的多样性、公平性、包容性和可及性。
Pharmaceut Med. 2024 Jul;38(4):261-276. doi: 10.1007/s40290-024-00529-8. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
8
Analysis of science journalism reveals gender and regional disparities in coverage.科学新闻分析揭示了报道中的性别和地区差异。
Elife. 2024 May 28;12:RP84855. doi: 10.7554/eLife.84855.
9
Mind the Gap! Working Toward Gender Equity in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease: Present and Future.注意差距!努力实现儿科和先天性心脏病领域的性别平等:现状与未来。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 7;13(9):e032837. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032837. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
10
Disparities in paediatric radiology research publications from low- and lower middle-income countries: a time for change.低及中低收入国家儿科放射学研究出版物的差异:是时候改变了。
Pediatr Radiol. 2024 Mar;54(3):468-477. doi: 10.1007/s00247-023-05762-y. Epub 2023 Sep 29.