Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Oct;99(10):1991-1997. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
To assess the feasibility of measuring ventilatory threshold (VT) in higher-level motor-complete spinal cord injury (SCI) using 4 different analysis methods based on noninvasive gas exchange.
Observational.
Laboratory testing.
Individuals with C4-T6 motor-complete SCI (16 paraplegia, 22 tetraplegia; American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A/B; 42±10 years old).
Not applicable.
VT from a graded arm cycling test to volitional exhaustion using 4 methods: ventilatory equivalents, excess CO, V-slope, and combined method.
VT could be identified in all individuals with paraplegia, but in only 68% of individuals with tetraplegia. Individuals without observable VT completed the graded exercise test with lower ventilatory rate, peak power output, and peak oxygen consumption (Vopeak) (all P<.05), compared to those with a detectable VT. Bland-Altman plots indicate minimal bias between methods (range: 0.01-0.03 L/min), with 95% limits of agreement of the difference within 0.25 L/min. Absolute V.o at VT with individual methods were all correlated to peak power output (r>0.74; P<.01) and Vopeak (r>0.91; P<.01), with negligible differences between methods.
The assessment of VT is a feasible alternative to peak exercise testing for aerobic fitness in individuals with higher-level, motor-complete SCI, although care should be taken when interpreting VT in individuals with tetraplegia who have lower cardiorespiratory fitness and lower peak power outputs.
评估使用 4 种基于无创气体交换的不同分析方法在较高水平运动完全性脊髓损伤(SCI)中测量通气阈(VT)的可行性。
观察性研究。
实验室测试。
C4-T6 运动完全性 SCI 患者(16 名截瘫,22 名四肢瘫;美国脊髓损伤协会损伤量表 A/B;42±10 岁)。
不适用。
使用 4 种方法(通气当量、CO 过剩、V 斜率和组合方法)从分级手臂循环测试到自愿衰竭测量 VT。
所有截瘫患者均能识别 VT,但四肢瘫患者中仅 68%能识别。与可检测到 VT 的患者相比,无可见 VT 的患者完成分级运动测试时的通气率、峰值功率输出和峰值摄氧量(Vopeak)较低(均 P<.05)。Bland-Altman 图表明各方法之间的偏差最小(范围:0.01-0.03 L/min),差异的 95%一致性界限在 0.25 L/min 内。个体方法的 VT 时的绝对 V.o 与峰值功率输出(r>0.74;P<.01)和 Vopeak(r>0.91;P<.01)均相关,各方法之间差异可忽略不计。
在较高水平运动完全性 SCI 患者中,VT 的评估是一种替代峰值运动测试评估有氧健身的可行方法,尽管在解释心肺功能较低和峰值功率输出较低的四肢瘫患者的 VT 时应谨慎。