Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Av Hippocrate 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Av Mounier 53 & 73, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Cleveland Clinic, Epilepsy Center, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Aug;129(8):1651-1657. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
Selected patients with intractable focal epilepsy who have failed a previous epilepsy surgery can become seizure-free with reoperation. Preoperative evaluation is exceedingly challenging in this cohort. We aim to investigate the diagnostic value of two noninvasive approaches, magnetoencephalography (MEG) and ictal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), in patients with failed epilepsy surgery.
We retrospectively included a consecutive cohort of patients who failed prior resective epilepsy surgery, underwent re-evaluation including MEG and ictal SPECT, and had another surgery after the re-evaluation. The relationship between resection and localization from each test was determined, and their association with seizure outcomes was analyzed.
A total of 46 patients were included; 21 (46%) were seizure-free at 1-year followup after reoperation. Twenty-seven (58%) had a positive MEG and 31 (67%) had a positive ictal SPECT. The resection of MEG foci was significantly associated with seizure-free outcome (p = 0.002). Overlap of ictal SPECT hyperperfusion zones with resection was significantly associated with seizure-free outcome in the subgroup of patients with injection time ≤20 seconds(p = 0.03), but did not show significant association in the overall cohort (p = 0.46) although all injections were ictal. Patients whose MEG and ictal SPECT were concordant on a sublobar level had a significantly higher chance of seizure freedom (p = 0.05).
MEG alone achieved successful localization in patients with failed epilepsy surgery with a statistical significance. Only ictal SPECT with early injection (≤20 seconds) had good localization value. Sublobar concordance between both tests was significantly associated with seizure freedom. SPECT can provide essential information in MEG-negative cases and vice versa.
Our results emphasize the importance of considering a multimodal presurgical evaluation including MEG and SPECT in all patients with a previous failed epilepsy surgery.
部分药物难治性局灶性癫痫患者在接受再次手术后可实现无癫痫发作。在该队列中,术前评估极具挑战性。本研究旨在探究两种无创方法,即脑磁图(MEG)和发作期单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT),在既往手术失败的癫痫患者中的诊断价值。
我们连续纳入了一组既往接受过切除术但再次手术前进行了 MEG 和发作期 SPECT 重新评估的患者。确定了每个测试的切除与定位之间的关系,并分析了它们与癫痫发作结果的相关性。
共纳入 46 例患者,其中 21 例(46%)在再次手术后 1 年随访时无癫痫发作。27 例(58%)MEG 阳性,31 例(67%)发作期 SPECT 阳性。MEG 焦点的切除与无癫痫发作结果显著相关(p=0.002)。在注射时间≤20 秒的亚组患者中,发作期 SPECT 高灌注区与切除区的重叠与无癫痫发作结果显著相关(p=0.03),但在总体队列中无显著相关性(p=0.46),尽管所有注射均为发作期。MEG 和发作期 SPECT 在亚叶水平一致的患者无癫痫发作的可能性显著更高(p=0.05)。
MEG 单独在既往癫痫手术失败的患者中实现了具有统计学意义的成功定位。只有早期注射(≤20 秒)的发作期 SPECT 具有良好的定位价值。两种测试的亚叶一致性与无癫痫发作显著相关。SPECT 可以在 MEG 阴性病例中提供重要信息,反之亦然。
我们的研究结果强调了在所有既往手术失败的癫痫患者中进行包括 MEG 和 SPECT 的多模态术前评估的重要性。