Suppr超能文献

第361号——应产妇要求实施剖宫产。

No. 361-Caesarean Delivery on Maternal Request.

作者信息

Alsayegh Eman, Bos Hayley, Campbell Kim, Barrett Jon

机构信息

Toronto, ON.

Victoria, BC.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Jul;40(7):967-971. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.12.009.

Abstract

A maternal request for an elective CS in the absence of a maternal or fetal indication may raise risk-benefit considerations and ethical concerns for a health care provider. Appropriate counselling of the patient on the risks and benefits in proceeding with a CDMR without medical indication is essential. Providers should have a clear knowledge of the risks and benefits of providing an elective CS without medical indications compared to the risks and benefits of supporting an attempt at vaginal delivery, so that the patient may reach an informed decision. The principle of patient autonomy should be respected but other ethical principles (beneficence, non-maleficence and justice) need to be taken into consideration during the counselling process. There are no studies to estimate maternal and neonatal risks in CDMR. Often studies on CS before the onset of labour are used as surrogates to determine risks and benefits. After exploring the reasons behind the patient's request, and discussing the risks and benefits, if a patient insists on her choice a physician may pursue one of the following two options: 1) Agree to perform the CS after 39+0 weeks gestation; 2) Disagree and refer the patient for a second opinion.

摘要

在没有母体或胎儿指征的情况下,产妇要求进行选择性剖宫产可能会引发医疗服务提供者对风险效益的考量以及伦理方面的担忧。就无医学指征进行剖宫产的风险和益处对患者进行恰当的咨询至关重要。与支持经阴道分娩的风险和益处相比,医疗服务提供者应清楚了解无医学指征进行选择性剖宫产的风险和益处,以便患者能够做出明智的决定。应尊重患者自主原则,但在咨询过程中还需考虑其他伦理原则(行善、不伤害和公正)。尚无研究评估剖宫产的母体和新生儿风险。通常将分娩发动前剖宫产的研究作为确定风险和益处的替代方法。在探究患者要求背后的原因并讨论风险和益处后,如果患者坚持自己的选择,医生可采取以下两种选择之一:1)同意在妊娠39 + 0周后进行剖宫产;2)不同意并建议患者寻求第二种意见。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验