Suppr超能文献

自上而下的脉冲会减少猎物种群数量和持久性。

Top-down pulses reduce prey population sizes and persistence.

作者信息

Hamman Elizabeth A, McCoy Michael W

机构信息

Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 19;8(1):9346. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27661-1.

Abstract

Resource pulses are well documented and have important consequences for population dynamics relative to continuous inputs. However, pulses of top-down factors (e.g. predation) are less explored and appreciated in the ecological literature. Here, we use a simple differential equation population model to show how pulsed removals of individuals from a population alter population size relative to continuous dynamics. Pulsed removals result in lower equilibrium population sizes relative to continuous removals, and the differences are greatest at low population growth rates, high removal rates, and with large, infrequent pulses. Furthermore, the timing of the removal pulses (either stochastic or cyclic) affects population size. For example, cyclic removals are less likely than stochastic removals to result in population eradication, but when eradication occurs, the time until eradication is shorter for cyclic than with stochastic removals.

摘要

资源脉冲已有充分记录,相对于持续输入而言,其对种群动态具有重要影响。然而,自上而下因素(如捕食)的脉冲在生态学文献中较少受到探讨和重视。在此,我们使用一个简单的微分方程种群模型来展示相对于连续动态,从种群中脉冲式移除个体如何改变种群大小。相对于连续移除,脉冲式移除导致的平衡种群大小更低,且在低种群增长率、高移除率以及大且不频繁的脉冲情况下差异最大。此外,移除脉冲的时间(无论是随机的还是周期性的)会影响种群大小。例如,周期性移除比随机移除导致种群灭绝的可能性更小,但当灭绝发生时,周期性移除导致灭绝的时间比随机移除更短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be16/6008325/ca9693333176/41598_2018_27661_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验