Suppr超能文献

直接尿液培养法与尿液分离及抗菌药敏试验在尿路感染诊断中的应用比较

Direct disk testing versus isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of urine from urinary tract infection.

作者信息

Mohammad Raz Nawzad, Omer Sherko Ali

机构信息

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq.

出版信息

Iran J Microbiol. 2018 Feb;10(1):37-44.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Urinary tract infections are common infections that can be caused by many bacterial pathogens. The susceptibility of such pathogens to antimicrobial agents is identified by different methods including disk diffusion test, direct sensitivity testing and determination minimum inhibitory concentration. The present study was conducted to isolate and identify bacteria cultured from urine samples and compare the results of direct sensitivity test (DST) against Kirby-Bauer's disk diffusion antimicrobial sensitivity (AST) with respect to reliability, time and cost.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Midstream urine samples were inoculated on blood and MacConkey agar plates; growth was evaluated after colony counting. We identified isolates based on their cultural and biochemical properties, and Vitek 2 system. Both DST and AST were performed on Mueller-Hinton agar using 10 antimicrobial agents. Error rate was calculated between the DST and AST as the proportion of comparisons between DST and AST test results. The comparisons represented as "very major error", "major error", or "minor error" and "agreement" (i.e, no error).

RESULTS

We tested 373 urine samples, of them 257 (68.9%) were from females and 116 (31.1%) from males. Primary cultivation detected growth (>10 cfu/mL) from 206 (55.23%) samples; Gram-negative isolates were the most common isolates; these included (111, 51.87%), and (19, 8.88%), while (14, 6.54%) was the main Gram-positive isolate. From the 1940 individual comparisons of DST and AST of single (pure) bacterial isolates, 12 comparisons (0.6%) represented very major errors, 9 (0.5%) major errors, 36 (1.8%) minor errors, and 1883 comparisons (97.1%) were in agreement.

CONCLUSION

was the most common isolate. Cefixime and cefpodoxime were found to be the most ineffective antimicrobial agents, while meropenem and nitrofurantoin were the most effective agents against all isolated urinary pathogens. DST and AST almost give the same results in pure cultures, and direct antimicrobial susceptibility for urine specimens can safely replace standard antimicrobial susceptibility in urinary tract infection.

摘要

背景与目的

尿路感染是常见感染,可由多种细菌病原体引起。此类病原体对抗菌药物的敏感性通过不同方法确定,包括纸片扩散法、直接药敏试验和最低抑菌浓度测定。本研究旨在分离并鉴定从尿液样本中培养出的细菌,并比较直接药敏试验(DST)与柯氏-鲍氏纸片扩散抗菌药敏试验(AST)在可靠性、时间和成本方面的结果。

材料与方法

中段尿样本接种于血平板和麦康凯琼脂平板;菌落计数后评估生长情况。我们根据细菌的培养和生化特性以及Vitek 2系统鉴定分离株。DST和AST均在 Mueller-Hinton琼脂上使用10种抗菌药物进行。计算DST和AST之间的错误率,以DST和AST试验结果之间的比较比例表示。比较结果分为“非常重大错误”、“重大错误”、“轻微错误”和“一致”(即无错误)。

结果

我们检测了373份尿液样本,其中257份(68.9%)来自女性,116份(31.1%)来自男性。初次培养从206份(55.23%)样本中检测到生长(>10 cfu/mL);革兰氏阴性分离株是最常见的分离株;其中包括大肠埃希菌(111株,51.87%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(19株,8.88%),而粪肠球菌(14株,6.54%)是主要的革兰氏阳性分离株。在对单一(纯)细菌分离株的DST和AST的1940次个体比较中,12次比较(0.6%)代表非常重大错误,9次(0.5%)重大错误,36次(1.8%)轻微错误,1883次比较(97.1%)结果一致。

结论

大肠埃希菌是最常见的分离株。发现头孢克肟和头孢泊肟是最无效的抗菌药物,而美罗培南和呋喃妥因是针对所有分离出的尿路病原体最有效的药物。在纯培养中,DST和AST几乎给出相同的结果,尿液标本的直接药敏试验可以安全地替代尿路感染中的标准药敏试验。

相似文献

2
Performance and clinical significance of direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing on urine from hospitalized patients.
Scand J Infect Dis. 2011 Oct;43(10):771-6. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2011.588609. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
3
Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing for acute urinary tract infections in women.
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2316-23. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2316-2323.1995.
7
Prospective evaluation of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disk diffusion on Mueller-Hinton rapid-SIR directly on blood cultures.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;93(1):14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.07.016. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
8
Direct susceptibility testing by disk diffusion on clinical samples: a rapid and accurate tool for antibiotic stewardship.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Jun;34(6):1207-12. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2349-2. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
9
Performance of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disk diffusion on MHR-SIR agar directly on urine specimens.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;38(1):185-189. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3413-5. Epub 2018 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Urinary Tract Infection.
Microbiol Spectr. 2016 Dec;4(6). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.UTI-0021-2015.
2
Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options.
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015 May;13(5):269-84. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3432. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
3
Direct susceptibility testing by disk diffusion on clinical samples: a rapid and accurate tool for antibiotic stewardship.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Jun;34(6):1207-12. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2349-2. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
6
Frequency, urinalysis and susceptibility profile of pathogens causing urinary tract infections in Enugu State, southeast Nigeria.
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2014 Jan-Feb;56(1):55-9. doi: 10.1590/S0036-46652014000100008.
7
Urinary tract infection syndromes: occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden.
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2014 Mar;28(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
8
The antibiotic susceptibility patterns of uropathogenic Escherichia coli, with special reference to the fluoroquinolones.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Jun;7(6):1027-30. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/4917.3038. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
9
10
Gender and age-dependent etiology of community-acquired urinary tract infections.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:349597. doi: 10.1100/2012/349597. Epub 2012 Apr 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验