Department of Nutrition Management, Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Nutr Clin Pract. 2018 Dec;33(6):790-795. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10105. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
There are several methods of enteral nutrition (EN) administration, including continuous, cyclic, intermittent, and bolus techniques, which can be used either alone or in combination. Continuous feeding involves hourly administration of EN over 24 hours assisted by a feeding pump; cyclic feeding involves administration of EN over a time period of <24 hours generally assisted by a feeding pump; intermittent feeding involves administration of EN over 20-60 minutes every 4-6 hours via pump assist or gravity assist; and bolus feeding involves administration of EN over a 4- to 10-minute period using a syringe or gravity drip. In practice, pump-assisted continuous feeding is generally acceptable for critically ill patients to prevent EN-related complications. However, a limited number of studies have been conducted to support this practice. In addition, regarding muscle protein synthesis and gastrointestinal hormone secretion, intermittent or bolus feeding may be more beneficial than continuous EN feeding for critically ill patients. For medically stable patients with feeding tubes terminating in the stomach, bolus feeding is favored with respect to practical factors, such as cost, convenience, and patient mobility. However, few studies have shown whether intermittent or bolus feeding is beneficial in a critical care setting at present. Additional randomized controlled studies comparing intermittent with bolus feeding are required.
有几种肠内营养(EN)管理方法,包括连续、循环、间歇和推注技术,这些方法可以单独使用或组合使用。连续喂养是指在 24 小时内通过喂食泵每小时给予 EN;循环喂养是指在<24 小时内通过喂食泵给予 EN;间歇喂养是指通过泵辅助或重力辅助每 4-6 小时给予 20-60 分钟的 EN;推注喂养是指使用注射器或重力滴注在 4-10 分钟内给予 EN。在实践中,泵辅助连续喂养通常适用于重症患者,以预防与 EN 相关的并发症。然而,只有少数研究支持这种做法。此外,关于肌肉蛋白质合成和胃肠激素分泌,间歇或推注喂养对重症患者可能比连续 EN 喂养更有益。对于胃内喂养管的病情稳定的患者,从实用因素(如成本、便利性和患者的活动能力)考虑,推注喂养更为有利。然而,目前很少有研究表明在重症监护环境中间歇或推注喂养是否有益。需要进行更多的随机对照研究来比较间歇与推注喂养。