College of Medicine and Health Science, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
International Organization for Migration, UN Migration Agency, Migration Health Division, Geneva, Switzerland.
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 20;18(1):777. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5689-x.
The health of migrants has become an important issue in global health and foreign policy. Assessing the current status of research activity and identifying gaps in global migration health (GMH) is an important step in mapping the evidence-base and on advocating health needs of migrants and mobile populations. The aim of this study was to analyze globally published peer-reviewed literature in GMH.
A bibliometric analysis methodology was used. The Scopus database was used to retrieve documents in peer-reviewed journals in GMH for the study period from 2000 to 2016. A group of experts in GMH developed the needed keywords and validated the final search strategy.
The number of retrieved documents was 21,457. Approximately one third (6878; 32.1%) of the retrieved documents were published in the last three years of the study period. In total, 5451 (25.4%) documents were about refugees and asylum seekers, while 1328 (6.2%) were about migrant workers, 440 (2.1%) were about international students, 679 (3.2%) were about victims of human trafficking/smuggling, 26 (0.1%) were about patients' mobility across international borders, and the remaining documents were about unspecified categories of migrants. The majority of the retrieved documents (10,086; 47.0%) were in psychosocial and mental health domain, while 2945 (13.7%) documents were in infectious diseases, 6819 (31.8%) documents were in health policy and systems, 2759 (12.8%) documents were in maternal and reproductive health, and 1918 (8.9%) were in non-communicable diseases. The contribution of authors and institutions in Asian countries, Latin America, Africa, Middle East, and Eastern European countries was low. Literature in GMH represents the perspectives of high-income migrant destination countries.
Our heat map of research output shows that despite the ever-growing prominence of human mobility across the globe, and Sustainable Development Goals of leaving no one behind, research output on migrants' health is not consistent with the global migration pattern. A stronger evidence base is needed to enable authorities to make evidence-informed decisions on migration health policy and practice. Research collaboration and networks should be encouraged to prioritize research in GMH.
移民健康已成为全球健康和外交政策的重要议题。评估当前移民健康(GMH)研究活动的现状并确定 GMH 领域的研究空白,是绘制证据基础图并倡导移民和流动人口健康需求的重要步骤。本研究旨在分析全球发表的 GMH 同行评议文献。
采用文献计量分析方法。使用 Scopus 数据库检索 2000 年至 2016 年研究期间 GMH 同行评议期刊中的文献。一组 GMH 专家制定了所需的关键词并验证了最终的搜索策略。
共检索到 21457 篇文献。检索到的文献中约有三分之一(6878 篇;32.1%)是在研究期间的最后三年发表的。总的来说,5451 篇(25.4%)文献是关于难民和寻求庇护者的,1328 篇(6.2%)是关于移民工人的,440 篇(2.1%)是关于国际学生的,679 篇(3.2%)是关于人口贩运/走私受害者的,26 篇(0.1%)是关于国际边界间病人流动的,其余文献则是关于未具体分类的移民。检索到的文献中,大部分(10086 篇;47.0%)属于社会心理和精神健康领域,2945 篇(13.7%)属于传染病领域,6819 篇(31.8%)属于卫生政策和体系领域,2759 篇(12.8%)属于母婴和生殖健康领域,1918 篇(8.9%)属于非传染性疾病领域。亚洲国家、拉丁美洲、非洲、中东和东欧国家的作者和机构的贡献较低。GMH 领域的文献代表了高收入移民目的地国家的观点。
尽管全球范围内的人口流动和可持续发展目标“不让任何一个人掉队”日益凸显,但研究移民健康的文献与全球移民模式并不相符。需要更强大的证据基础,以使当局能够就移民健康政策和实践做出基于证据的决策。应鼓励研究合作和网络,优先开展 GMH 研究。