Suenaga Mitsukuni, Schirripa Marta, Cao Shu, Zhang Wu, Yang Dongyun, Cremolini Chiara, Lonardi Sara, Bergamo Francesca, Ning Yang, Yamamoto Noriko, Okazaki Satoshi, Berger Martin D, Miyamoto Yuji, Gopez Roel, Barzi Afsaneh, Yamaguchi Toshiharu, Stintzing Sebastian, Heinemann Volker, Loupakis Fotios, Falcone Alfredo, Lenz Heinz-Josef
Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Gastroenterology Center, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Pharmacogenomics J. 2018 Sep;18(5):623-632. doi: 10.1038/s41397-018-0030-8. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
PIN1-mediated substrate isomerization plays a role in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. We hypothesized that genetic polymorphisms in PIN1-related pathways may affect tumor sensitivity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. We analyzed genomic DNA from five cohorts of mCRC patients (total 950) treated with different first-line treatments: oxaliplatin cohorts 1 (n = 146) and 2 (n = 70); irinotecan cohorts 1 (n = 228), and 2 (n = 276); and combination cohort (n = 230). Single nucleotide polymorphisms of candidate genes were analyzed by PCR-based direct sequencing. In the oxaliplatin cohort 1, patients carrying any PIN1 rs2233678 C allele had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than the G/G variant (PFS, 7.4 vs. 15.0 months, hazard ratio [HR] 3.24, P < 0.001; OS, 16.9 vs. 31.5 months, HR: 2.38, P = 0.003). In contrast, patients with C allele had longer median PFS than patients with G/G (11.9 vs. 9.4 months, HR: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.45-0.91, P = 0.009) in the irinotecan cohort 1. No significant differences were observed in the combination cohort. In comparison between the irinotecan cohort 1 and combination cohort, the patients carrying the G/G variant benefit greatly from the combination compared with irinotecan-based regimen (PFS, 11.6 vs. 9.4 months, HR 0.61, 95%CI: 0.47-0.78, P < 0.001; OS, 30.6 vs. 24.0 months, HR 0.79, 95%CI: 0.62-1.02, P = 0.060), while no significant difference was shown in any C allele. Germline PIN1 polymorphisms may predict clinical outcomes in mCRC patients receiving oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based therapy, and identify specific populations favorable to oxaliplatin plus irinotecan combination therapy.
PIN1介导的底物异构化在DNA双链断裂修复中发挥作用。我们推测,PIN1相关通路中的基因多态性可能影响转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者对奥沙利铂或伊立替康的肿瘤敏感性。我们分析了五组接受不同一线治疗的mCRC患者(共950例)的基因组DNA:奥沙利铂组1(n = 146)和组2(n = 70);伊立替康组1(n = 228)和组2(n = 276);以及联合治疗组(n = 230)。通过基于PCR的直接测序分析候选基因的单核苷酸多态性。在奥沙利铂组1中,携带任何PIN1 rs2233678 C等位基因的患者无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)均短于G/G变体(PFS,7.4个月对15.0个月,风险比[HR] 3.24,P < 0.001;OS,16.9个月对31.5个月,HR:2.38,P = 0.003)。相比之下,在伊立替康组1中,携带C等位基因的患者中位PFS长于G/G患者(11.9个月对9.4个月,HR:0.64,95%CI:0.45 - 0.91,P = 0.009)。联合治疗组未观察到显著差异。在伊立替康组1和联合治疗组的比较中,携带G/G变体的患者与基于伊立替康的方案相比,从联合治疗中获益更大(PFS,11.6个月对9.4个月,HR 0.61,95%CI:0.47 - 0.78,P < 0.001;OS,30.6个月对24.0个月,HR 0.79,95%CI:0.62 - 1.02,P = 0.060),而任何C等位基因均未显示出显著差异。种系PIN1多态性可能预测接受基于奥沙利铂或伊立替康治疗的mCRC患者的临床结局,并识别出对奥沙利铂加伊立替康联合治疗有利的特定人群。