Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Miyagi, Japan.
Department of Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan.
Cancer Sci. 2021 Apr;112(4):1567-1578. doi: 10.1111/cas.14841. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
Oxaliplatin (OX) and irinotecan (IRI) are used as key drugs for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, no biomarkers have been identified to decide which of the drugs is initially used. In this translational research (TR) of the TRICOLORE trial, the advanced colorectal cancer subtype (aCRCS) was analyzed as a potential biomarker for the selection of OX or IRI. We collected 335 (68.8%) formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) primary tumor specimens from 487 patients registered in the TRICOLORE trial and performed direct sequencing and immunohistochemical staining of CRC-related genes, comprehensive gene-expression analysis, and genome-wide methylation analysis. The progression-free survival (PFS) of the IRI group was significantly better compared with the OX group in BRAF wild-type (WT), PTEN-positive, and aCRCS A1 patients. Among the molecular factors, aCRCS were only associated with the PFS of OX and IRI groups. The PFS of the IRI group was significantly better compared with the OX group in aCRCS A1 + B1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41-0.82; P = .0023). In contrast, the OX group had better PFS compared with the IRI group in aCRCS B2, although this was not statistically significant (HR = 1.66; 95% CI = 0.94-2.96; P = .083). Nearly half of patients with mCRC (46.8%, aCRCS A1 + B1) respond well to IRI, while only about 18.5% (aCRCS B2) of patients with mCRC responded well to OX. In conclusion, the aCRCS might be a predictive factor for the clinical outcomes of OX-based and IRI-based therapies.
奥沙利铂(OX)和伊立替康(IRI)被用作转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)一线治疗的关键药物。然而,目前尚无生物标志物可用于确定初始使用哪种药物。在 TRICOLORE 试验的这项转化研究(TR)中,我们将晚期结直肠癌亚型(aCRCS)作为选择 OX 或 IRI 的潜在生物标志物进行分析。我们从 TRICOLORE 试验中登记的 487 名患者中收集了 335 份(68.8%)福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋(FFPE)的原发肿瘤标本,并对 CRC 相关基因进行直接测序和免疫组织化学染色、全面基因表达分析和全基因组甲基化分析。BRAF 野生型(WT)、PTEN 阳性和 aCRCS A1 患者中,IRI 组的无进展生存期(PFS)显著优于 OX 组。在分子因素中,aCRCS 仅与 OX 和 IRI 组的 PFS 相关。aCRCS A1+B1 患者中,IRI 组的 PFS 显著优于 OX 组(风险比 [HR] = 0.58;95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.41-0.82;P = 0.0023)。相反,在 aCRCS B2 患者中,OX 组的 PFS 优于 IRI 组,但差异无统计学意义(HR = 1.66;95%CI = 0.94-2.96;P = 0.083)。大约一半的 mCRC 患者(46.8%,aCRCS A1+B1)对 IRI 反应良好,而只有约 18.5%(aCRCS B2)的 mCRC 患者对 OX 反应良好。总之,aCRCS 可能是基于 OX 和 IRI 的治疗临床结局的预测因子。