1 International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care (IAHPC) , Houston, Texas.
2 Institute of Culture and Society , ATLANTES Program, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain .
J Palliat Med. 2018 Oct;21(10):1458-1465. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0149. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care implemented Opioid Price Watch (OPW) to monitor availability, dispensing prices and affordability of opioids. We found that opioids with complex delivery mechanisms [fentanyl transdermal (TD) patches, sustained-release (SR) morphine, and SR oxycodone] had lower dispensing prices than immediate-release (IR) morphine formulations.
Identify the extent that SR and TD formulations are dispensed at lower prices than generic IR morphine and the possible reasons to explain this observation.
Using OPW data for 30-day treatment Defined Daily Dosages, we identified where SR and TD formulations are dispensed at lower prices than IR morphine. Then we analyzed national lists of essential medicines (EML) in middle- and low-income countries to answer two questions: (1) Do they have opioids included? If yes, (2) Which ones? We then sought information on selection, budget allocation, and procurement for EML. OPW participants confirmed/verified the EML information.
Eighteen countries reported higher dispensing prices for IR morphine (oral and/or injectable) than TD or SR formulation. Injectable morphine was highest in seven and lowest in two (range: $74-$742). SR morphine was the least expensive, while TD fentanyl was second. Median dispensing price for IR oral morphine was higher than SR morphine. The EML for 10 countries include opioids in TD and/or SR formulations.
Opioids in expensive formulations are being favored over IR morphine both at the dispensing level and in their inclusion in national EML. Governments must take decisions based on efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of medications.
国际姑息治疗协会实施了阿片类药物价格监测(OPW),以监测阿片类药物的供应情况、配药价格和可负担性。我们发现,具有复杂给药机制的阿片类药物[芬太尼透皮(TD)贴剂、缓释(SR)吗啡和 SR 羟考酮]的配药价格低于即释(IR)吗啡制剂。
确定 SR 和 TD 制剂的配药价格是否低于通用 IR 吗啡,并解释这种观察结果的可能原因。
我们使用 OPW 数据中的 30 天治疗日剂量(DDD),确定 SR 和 TD 制剂的配药价格是否低于 IR 吗啡。然后,我们分析了中低收入国家的基本药物清单(EML),以回答两个问题:(1)它们是否包含阿片类药物?如果有,(2)是哪些?然后,我们寻找有关 EML 的选择、预算分配和采购的信息。OPW 参与者确认/验证了 EML 信息。
有 18 个国家报告称,IR 吗啡(口服和/或注射)的配药价格高于 TD 或 SR 制剂。7 个国家的注射用吗啡价格最高,2 个国家的价格最低(范围:74-742 美元)。SR 吗啡的价格最便宜,而 TD 芬太尼的价格次之。IR 口服吗啡的中位数配药价格高于 SR 吗啡。10 个国家的 EML 包括 TD 和/或 SR 制剂的阿片类药物。
在配药层面和纳入国家 EML 方面,昂贵制剂的阿片类药物优先于 IR 吗啡。政府必须根据药物的疗效、安全性和成本效益做出决策。