Suppr超能文献

一项横断面试点研究,旨在监测全球阿片类药物的可及性、零售价格及可负担性。

Cross-sectional pilot study to monitor the availability, dispensed prices, and affordability of opioids around the globe.

作者信息

De Lima Liliana, Pastrana Tania, Radbruch Lukas, Wenk Roberto

机构信息

International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care, Houston, Texas, USA.

Department of Palliative Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Oct;48(4):649-59.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.12.237. Epub 2014 Apr 2.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Opioids are essential medicines. The World Health Organization and Health Action International monitor the price of essential medicines. However, their surveys do not include opioids, and there is no information on their affordability.

OBJECTIVES

To provide information on access to pain treatment, as measured by the availability and dispensed price of five opioids in 13 formulations, and the affordability of oral immediate-release (IR) morphine.

METHODS

The International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care members were distributed by their countries' Gross National Income (GNI) level using the World Bank categories, i.e., high income country (HIC), upper middle income country (UMIC), lower middle income country (LMIC), low income country (LIC), and randomized. A total of 10 participants were selected from each (n=40) domain. Participants were asked to identify a pharmacy located closest to a public facility that provides diagnosis/treatment for life-threatening conditions and report the lowest dispensed price of the smallest selling unit and strength of each formulation. Availability and median (Me) price were calculated for each. Affordability and percentage of international buyer price (IBP) were calculated for morphine oral solid IR.

RESULTS

A total of 30 participants from 26 countries (response rate=75%) responded. Significant correlation was found between availability and GNI (range: 65-68% [HIC and LIC]; R=0.781; P<0.0001). Injectable and morphine oral solid sustained release (SR) were the most available (59% and 55%). Methadone (oral) was the least expensive (Me=0.5) followed by fentanyl (transdermal; Me=2.2). The Me price for morphine oral solid IR and ratios between dispensed and IBP were lower in HIC than in LMIC (price=0.03 vs. 0.16; ratio=2.23 vs. 0.03). Affordability for morphine oral solid IR was five days (Me=0.1; range=29-0.25).

CONCLUSION

Patients in LMIC and LIC have limited access to opioids, and there are subsidies in place for more expensive medications and formulations in all GNI levels, but not for morphine oral solid IR. Additional research is necessary to identify the reasons behind these findings.

摘要

背景

阿片类药物是基本药物。世界卫生组织和国际卫生行动组织监测基本药物的价格。然而,他们的调查不包括阿片类药物,也没有关于其可负担性的信息。

目的

提供有关疼痛治疗可及性的信息,通过13种制剂中5种阿片类药物的可得性和配药价格以及口服即释吗啡的可负担性来衡量。

方法

国际临终关怀与姑息治疗协会成员按其国家的国民总收入(GNI)水平,采用世界银行的分类,即高收入国家(HIC)、中高收入国家(UMIC)、中低收入国家(LMIC)、低收入国家(LIC)进行分布,并进行随机分组。每个领域共选出10名参与者(n = 40)。要求参与者找出最靠近为危及生命的疾病提供诊断/治疗的公共设施的一家药店,并报告每种制剂最小销售单位和规格的最低配药价格。计算每种药物的可得性和中位数(Me)价格。计算吗啡口服固体即释剂型的可负担性和国际采购价格(IBP)百分比。

结果

来自26个国家的30名参与者(回复率 = 75%)做出了回应。发现可得性与国民总收入之间存在显著相关性(范围:65 - 68% [高收入国家和低收入国家];R = 0.781;P < 0.0001)。注射剂和吗啡口服固体缓释剂型的可得性最高(分别为59%和55%)。美沙酮(口服)最便宜(Me = 0.5),其次是芬太尼(透皮;Me = 2.2)。高收入国家吗啡口服固体即释剂型的Me价格以及配药价格与国际采购价格的比率低于中低收入国家(价格 = 0.03对0.16;比率 = 2.23对0.03)。吗啡口服固体即释剂型的可负担性为5天(Me = 0.1;范围 = 29 - 0.25)。

结论

中低收入国家和低收入国家的患者获得阿片类药物的机会有限,所有国民总收入水平对更昂贵的药物和制剂都有补贴,但对吗啡口服固体即释剂型没有。有必要进行更多研究以确定这些发现背后的原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验