Smeenk Frank W J M, Schrijver Laurien A, van Bavel Hennie C J, van de Laar Eric F J
Dept of Pulmonology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven and School SHE, FHML, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Breathe (Sheff). 2017 Dec;13(4):e95-e102. doi: 10.1183/20734735.013717.
UNLABELLED: In 2014, a group of physicians of the Catharina Hospital in Eindhoven (The Netherlands) started a project called "Talking about end-of-life care in a timely manner". Just like others in the country, the Eindhoven group noticed that regularly, very frail elderly people were admitted to hospital in acute situations without there ever having been conversations about their wishes concerning treatment options at the end of life. The project aimed to prevent unnecessary admissions and treatments for these frail patients by stimulating physicians, patients and informal caregivers to start conversations about end-of-life care together at an earlier stage. The first phase of the project consisted of research: a study of the relevant literature on previous projects on the matter and a small empirical study in the Eindhoven region. This yielded as the most important causes of the delay of these conversations: the factors of timing (when is the right moment?), reserve (because of the potential emotional despair of the patient) and hope (who am I to rob a patient of their hope?). In the second phase of the project, several approaches were developed to help caregivers, patients and informal caregivers with the planning and execution of conversations about end-of-life care. Meetings were organised for patients and informal caregivers to foster awareness and to provide information. For caregivers, information was provided ( symposia and an app) and specifically designed training sessions were developed. The training sessions consist of reflection on the caregivers' personal choices with regard to end-of-life care (research has shown that caregivers choose less intensive medical treatments at the end of life) and of practising with the known complicating factors of timing, reserve and hope, and the different ways of thinking and talking about death and dying (typology of death and dying).
To understand the importance of discussing end-of-life care preferences with your patients at the appropriate time.To become aware of the possible interfering factors of timing, reserve and hope in talking about end-of-life care.
Using the Surprise Question may be a useful tool in determining the appropriate moment to discuss this with your patients.By talking with your patients about end-of-life care in a timely manner, unnecessary and unwanted treatment can be prevented.Constraints of doctors to implement this in their practice can be overcome by implementing a training session as described in this article.Collaboration between primary and secondary care on this issue is strongly recommended in order to assure the care continuum maximally.
2014年,荷兰埃因霍温市卡塔琳娜医院的一群医生启动了一个名为“及时谈论临终关怀”的项目。和该国其他地方的人一样,埃因霍温团队注意到,经常有非常虚弱的老年人在急性情况下被送进医院,而此前从未就他们对临终治疗方案的意愿进行过交谈。该项目旨在通过鼓励医生、患者和非正式护理人员在更早阶段共同开始关于临终关怀的对话,防止对这些体弱患者进行不必要的住院治疗和治疗。该项目的第一阶段包括研究:对以往关于该问题的项目的相关文献进行研究,并在埃因霍温地区进行一项小型实证研究。这得出了这些对话延迟的最重要原因:时机因素(何时是合适的时机?)、保留态度(因为担心患者可能会陷入情感绝望)和希望(我怎么能剥夺患者的希望呢?)。在项目的第二阶段,开发了几种方法来帮助护理人员、患者和非正式护理人员规划和开展关于临终关怀的对话。为患者和非正式护理人员组织了会议,以提高认识并提供信息。为护理人员提供了信息(研讨会和一个应用程序),并开发了专门设计的培训课程。培训课程包括反思护理人员在临终关怀方面的个人选择(研究表明,护理人员在临终时会选择强度较低的医疗治疗),以及针对时机、保留态度和希望等已知复杂因素以及谈论死亡和临终的不同思维和方式(死亡和临终的类型学)进行练习。
了解在适当的时候与患者讨论临终关怀偏好的重要性。意识到在谈论临终关怀时可能出现的时机、保留态度和希望等干扰因素。
使用“意外问题”可能是确定与患者讨论此事的合适时机的有用工具。通过及时与患者谈论临终关怀,可以防止不必要和不想要的治疗。通过实施本文所述的培训课程,可以克服医生在实践中实施这一做法的限制。强烈建议初级和二级护理在这个问题上进行合作,以最大程度地确保护理的连续性。