• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Talking about end-of-life care in a timely manner.及时谈论临终关怀。
Breathe (Sheff). 2017 Dec;13(4):e95-e102. doi: 10.1183/20734735.013717.
2
[Barriers to Conversations About Death and Dying in the Medicine].[医学领域中关于死亡与临终话题的沟通障碍]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2020 May;55(5):334-339. doi: 10.1055/a-1002-8080. Epub 2020 May 20.
3
Talking about death and dying in a hospital setting - a qualitative study of the wishes for end-of-life conversations from the perspective of patients and spouses.在医院环境中谈论死亡和濒死-从患者和配偶的角度出发对生命末期谈话愿望的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Nov 2;19(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00675-1.
4
End of life care for frail older patients in family practice (ELFOP)--protocol of a longitudinal qualitative study on needs, appropriateness and utilisation of services.家庭医学中体弱老年患者的终末关怀(ELFOP)——一项关于需求、适宜性和服务利用的纵向定性研究方案。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 May 3;14:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-52.
5
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
6
Community engagement and involvement in Ghana: conversations with community stakeholders to inform surgical research.加纳的社区参与:与社区利益相关者的对话,为外科研究提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 5;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00270-5.
7
PA20 Views on talking about death, dying and loss.PA20:关于谈论死亡、濒死和丧失的观点。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Apr;5 Suppl 1:A25. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000906.80.
8
Talking about end of life in general palliative care - what's going on? A qualitative study on end-of-life conversations in an acute care hospital in Denmark.在一般姑息治疗中谈论临终 - 怎么回事?丹麦一家急性护理医院关于临终谈话的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jul 25;18(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0448-z.
9
Before the 2020 Pandemic: an observational study exploring public knowledge, attitudes, plans, and preferences towards death and end of life care in Wales.2020 年大流行之前:一项观察性研究,探索威尔士公众对死亡和临终关怀的知识、态度、计划和偏好。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jul 20;20(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00806-2.
10
Cognitive-behavioural therapy compared with standardised medical care for adults with dissociative non-epileptic seizures: the CODES RCT.认知行为疗法对比成人非癫痫性发作的标准化医疗照护:CODES RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jun;25(43):1-144. doi: 10.3310/hta25430.

引用本文的文献

1
Family Medicine Residents' Knowledge and Attitudes About End-of-Life Care in Taif City, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯塔伊夫市家庭医学住院医师对临终关怀的知识与态度
Cureus. 2023 Dec 17;15(12):e50652. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50652. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Dying Well-Informed: The Need for Better Clinical Education Surrounding Facilitating End-of-Life Conversations.知情善终:临床教育需改善,以促进临终对话。
Yale J Biol Med. 2019 Dec 20;92(4):757-764. eCollection 2019 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
How accurate is the 'Surprise Question' at identifying patients at the end of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis.“意外问题”在识别临终患者方面的准确性如何?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2017 Aug 2;15(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0907-4.
2
How U.S. Doctors Die: A Cohort Study of Healthcare Use at the End of Life.美国医生的死亡方式:一项关于临终医疗使用情况的队列研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 May;64(5):1061-7. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14112. Epub 2016 May 16.
3
Should we practice what we profess? Care near the end of life.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 12;372(7):595-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1413167.
4
Predictors of mortality in hospitalized adults with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.住院成人慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者死亡的预测因素。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013 Apr;10(2):81-9. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201208-043OC.
5
Freedom from the tyranny of choice--teaching the end-of-life conversation.摆脱选择的束缚——讲授临终谈话
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 3;366(18):1655-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1201202.

及时谈论临终关怀。

Talking about end-of-life care in a timely manner.

作者信息

Smeenk Frank W J M, Schrijver Laurien A, van Bavel Hennie C J, van de Laar Eric F J

机构信息

Dept of Pulmonology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven and School SHE, FHML, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Breathe (Sheff). 2017 Dec;13(4):e95-e102. doi: 10.1183/20734735.013717.

DOI:10.1183/20734735.013717
PMID:29928457
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6003272/
Abstract

UNLABELLED: In 2014, a group of physicians of the Catharina Hospital in Eindhoven (The Netherlands) started a project called "Talking about end-of-life care in a timely manner". Just like others in the country, the Eindhoven group noticed that regularly, very frail elderly people were admitted to hospital in acute situations without there ever having been conversations about their wishes concerning treatment options at the end of life. The project aimed to prevent unnecessary admissions and treatments for these frail patients by stimulating physicians, patients and informal caregivers to start conversations about end-of-life care together at an earlier stage. The first phase of the project consisted of research: a study of the relevant literature on previous projects on the matter and a small empirical study in the Eindhoven region. This yielded as the most important causes of the delay of these conversations: the factors of timing (when is the right moment?), reserve (because of the potential emotional despair of the patient) and hope (who am I to rob a patient of their hope?). In the second phase of the project, several approaches were developed to help caregivers, patients and informal caregivers with the planning and execution of conversations about 
end-of-life care. Meetings were organised for patients and informal caregivers to foster awareness and to provide information. For caregivers, information was provided ( symposia and an app) and specifically designed training sessions were developed. The training sessions consist of reflection on the caregivers' personal choices with regard to end-of-life care (research has shown that caregivers choose less intensive medical treatments at the end of life) and of practising with the known complicating factors of timing, reserve and hope, and the different ways of thinking and talking about death and dying (typology of death and dying).

EDUCATIONAL AIMS

To understand the importance of discussing end-of-life care preferences with your patients at the appropriate time.To become aware of the possible interfering factors of timing, reserve and hope in talking about end-of-life care.

KEY POINTS

Using the Surprise Question may be a useful tool in determining the appropriate moment to discuss this with your patients.By talking with your patients about end-of-life care in a timely manner, unnecessary and unwanted treatment can be prevented.Constraints of doctors to implement this in their practice can be overcome by implementing a training session as described in this article.Collaboration between primary and secondary care on this issue is strongly recommended in order to assure the care continuum maximally.

摘要

未标注

2014年,荷兰埃因霍温市卡塔琳娜医院的一群医生启动了一个名为“及时谈论临终关怀”的项目。和该国其他地方的人一样,埃因霍温团队注意到,经常有非常虚弱的老年人在急性情况下被送进医院,而此前从未就他们对临终治疗方案的意愿进行过交谈。该项目旨在通过鼓励医生、患者和非正式护理人员在更早阶段共同开始关于临终关怀的对话,防止对这些体弱患者进行不必要的住院治疗和治疗。该项目的第一阶段包括研究:对以往关于该问题的项目的相关文献进行研究,并在埃因霍温地区进行一项小型实证研究。这得出了这些对话延迟的最重要原因:时机因素(何时是合适的时机?)、保留态度(因为担心患者可能会陷入情感绝望)和希望(我怎么能剥夺患者的希望呢?)。在项目的第二阶段,开发了几种方法来帮助护理人员、患者和非正式护理人员规划和开展关于临终关怀的对话。为患者和非正式护理人员组织了会议,以提高认识并提供信息。为护理人员提供了信息(研讨会和一个应用程序),并开发了专门设计的培训课程。培训课程包括反思护理人员在临终关怀方面的个人选择(研究表明,护理人员在临终时会选择强度较低的医疗治疗),以及针对时机、保留态度和希望等已知复杂因素以及谈论死亡和临终的不同思维和方式(死亡和临终的类型学)进行练习。

教育目标

了解在适当的时候与患者讨论临终关怀偏好的重要性。意识到在谈论临终关怀时可能出现的时机、保留态度和希望等干扰因素。

关键点

使用“意外问题”可能是确定与患者讨论此事的合适时机的有用工具。通过及时与患者谈论临终关怀,可以防止不必要和不想要的治疗。通过实施本文所述的培训课程,可以克服医生在实践中实施这一做法的限制。强烈建议初级和二级护理在这个问题上进行合作,以最大程度地确保护理的连续性。