Vernazza C R, Carr K, Holmes R D, Wildman J, Gray J, Exley C, Smith R A, Donaldson C
School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2021 Nov 29;8(1):23800844211056241. doi: 10.1177/23800844211056241.
In any health system, choices must be made about the allocation of resources (budget), which are often scarce. Economics has defined frameworks to aid resource allocation, and program budgeting marginal analysis (PBMA) is one such framework. In principle, patient and public values can be incorporated into these frameworks, using techniques such as willingness to pay (WTP). However, this has not been done before, and few formal resource allocation processes have been undertaken in dentistry. This study aimed to undertake a PBMA with embedded WTP values in a national dental setting.
The PBMA process was undertaken by a panel of participant-researchers representing commissioners, dentists, dental public health staff, and academics. The panel reviewed current allocations and generated a set of weighted criteria to evaluate services against. Services to be considered for removal and investment were determined by the panel and wider discussion and then scored against the criteria. Values from a nationally representative WTP survey of the public contributed to the scores for interventions. Final decisions on removal and investment were taken after panel discussion using individual anonymous electronic voting.
The PBMA process resulted in recommendations to invest in new program components to improve access to general dentists, care home dentistry, and extra support for dental public health input into local government decisions. Disinvestments were recommended in orthodontics and to remove routine scaling and polishing of teeth.
The PBMA process was successful in raising awareness of resource allocation issues. Implementation of findings will depend on the ability of decision makers to find ways of operationalizing the decisions. The process illustrates practical aspects of the process that future dental PBMAs could learn from.
This study illustrates a framework for resource allocation in dental health services and will aid decision makers in implementing their own resource allocation systems.
在任何卫生系统中,都必须对资源(预算)的分配做出选择,而资源往往是稀缺的。经济学已定义了有助于资源分配的框架,项目预算边际分析(PBMA)就是这样一个框架。原则上,可以使用诸如支付意愿(WTP)等技术将患者和公众价值观纳入这些框架。然而,此前尚未这样做过,而且牙科领域很少进行正式的资源分配流程。本研究旨在在国家牙科环境中进行一项嵌入WTP值的PBMA。
PBMA流程由一个由代表专员、牙医、牙科公共卫生人员和学者的参与研究人员组成的小组进行。该小组审查了当前的分配情况,并生成了一套加权标准来评估各项服务。小组通过更广泛的讨论确定了要考虑取消和投资的服务,然后根据这些标准进行评分。来自全国具有代表性的公众WTP调查的价值被纳入干预措施的评分。在小组讨论后,使用个人匿名电子投票做出关于取消和投资的最终决定。
PBMA流程得出了一些建议,包括投资新的项目组成部分,以改善获得普通牙医服务的机会、护理院牙科服务,以及为地方政府决策提供更多牙科公共卫生投入的支持。建议减少正畸方面的投入,并取消常规的牙齿洁治和抛光。
PBMA流程成功提高了对资源分配问题的认识。研究结果的实施将取决于决策者找到将这些决定付诸实践的方法的能力。该流程展示了未来牙科PBMA可以借鉴的该流程的实际方面。
本研究阐述了牙科保健服务资源分配的框架,并将有助于决策者实施他们自己的资源分配系统。