Suppr超能文献

在国家主导、地区提供的系统中,如何为资源分配确定优先级:一项使用 NHS 英格兰牙科招标人员的半结构化访谈的定性研究。

How does priority setting for resource allocation happen in commissioning dental services in a nationally led, regionally delivered system: a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with NHS England dental commissioners.

机构信息

Centre for Oral Health Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Child Dental Health, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 23;9(3):e024995. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024995.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To understand approaches to priority setting for healthcare service resource allocation at an operational level in a nationally commissioned but regionally delivered service.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using semistructured interviews and a Framework analysis.

SETTING

National Health Service dentistry commissioning teams within subregional offices in England.

PARTICIPANTS

All 31 individuals holding the relevant role (dental lead commissioner in subregional offices) were approached directly and from this 14 participants were recruited, with 12 interviews completed. Both male and female genders and all regions were represented in the final sample.

RESULTS

Three major themes arose. First, 'Methods of priority setting and barriers to explicit approaches' was a common theme, specifically identifying the main methods as: perpetuating historical allocations, pressure from politicians and clinicians and use of needs assessments while barriers were time and skill deficits, a lack of national guidance and an inflexible contracting arrangements stopping resource allocation. Second, 'Relationships with key stakeholders and advisors' were discussed, showing the important nature of relationships with clinical advisors but variation in the quality of these relationships was noted. Finally, 'Tensions between national and local responsibilities' were illustrated, where there was confusion about where power and autonomy lay.

CONCLUSIONS

Commissioners recognised a need for resource allocation but relied on clinical advice and needs assessment in order to set priorities. More explicit priority setting was prevented by structure of the commissioning system and standard national contracts with providers. Further research is required to embed and simplify adoption of tools to aid priority setting.

摘要

目的

了解国家委托、地区执行的医疗服务中,运营层面医疗服务资源分配的优先顺序设定方法。

设计

采用半结构式访谈和框架分析法的定性研究。

地点

英格兰次区域办事处的国家卫生服务牙科委托团队。

参与者

所有(次区域办事处的牙科首席专员)相关角色的 31 人均被直接联系,其中 14 人被招募,完成了 12 次访谈。最终样本包括男性和女性以及所有地区。

结果

出现了三个主要主题。首先,“优先顺序设定方法和明确方法的障碍”是一个共同的主题,明确确定了主要方法为:延续历史分配、政治和临床医生的压力以及使用需求评估,而障碍是时间和技能不足、缺乏国家指导和僵化的合同安排阻止资源分配。其次,讨论了“与主要利益相关者和顾问的关系”,显示了与临床顾问关系的重要性,但也注意到这些关系的质量存在差异。最后,“国家和地方责任之间的紧张关系”得到了说明,权力和自主权的归属存在混淆。

结论

专员们认识到资源分配的必要性,但依赖临床建议和需求评估来确定优先顺序。委托系统的结构和与供应商的标准国家合同阻碍了更明确的优先顺序设定。需要进一步研究,以嵌入和简化辅助优先顺序设定的工具的采用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ed/6475363/650f0b7e58a6/bmjopen-2018-024995f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验