Suppr超能文献

在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)内进行的一项心理社会癌症干预计划随机对照试验中,对招募和留住参与者的可行性进行定性分析。

Qualitative analysis of feasibility of recruitment and retention in a planned randomised controlled trial of a psychosocial cancer intervention within the NHS.

作者信息

Duncan M, Korszun A, White P, Eva G

机构信息

Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.

Department of Clinical Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2018 Jun 22;19(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2728-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The randomised control trial (RCT) is the most rigorous method of evaluating interventions. Recruitment is often slower and more challenging than expected. The aim of the current paper is to understand the feasibility of recruitment within the NHS and the barriers and motivators to recruitment from the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs).

METHODS

NHS HCPs were surveyed to establish their willingness to participate. Twenty HCPs were interviewed to establish barriers and motivators to recruitment. Eleven patients were interviewed to understand their willingness to participate. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

HCP interviews identified key barriers to recruitment: practical barriers included workload and time; clinical barriers included terminology and concern that the trial implied criticism of their current practice; and patient barriers included gender and cultural factors. Motivators to recruitment included: regular communication between research and clinical teams; feedback on findings; and patient and individual benefits for clinicians. Patient interviews suggested that participation in a trial of a psychosocial intervention would strengthen existing coping skills and develop mechanisms for those who were struggling.

CONCLUSIONS

Survey results demonstrated that recruitment to an RCT of a psychosocial intervention for people living with and beyond cancer would be feasible within the NHS if specific barriers are addressed. From a clinician point of view, barriers should be addressed to improve recruitment, particularly training and education of clinicians and clear communication. From a patient perspective, interventions and RCT should be tailored to target those not routinely represented in RCTs.

摘要

背景

随机对照试验(RCT)是评估干预措施最严格的方法。招募工作往往比预期更缓慢且更具挑战性。本文旨在了解英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)内招募工作的可行性,以及从患者和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)的角度来看招募工作的障碍和动机。

方法

对NHS的HCPs进行调查,以确定他们参与的意愿。对20名HCPs进行访谈,以确定招募工作的障碍和动机。对11名患者进行访谈,以了解他们参与的意愿。采用主题分析法对访谈进行分析。

结果

对HCPs的访谈确定了招募工作的关键障碍:实际障碍包括工作量和时间;临床障碍包括术语以及担心试验意味着对他们当前做法的批评;患者障碍包括性别和文化因素。招募工作的动机包括:研究团队与临床团队之间的定期沟通;研究结果的反馈;以及对临床医生的患者和个人益处。患者访谈表明,参与心理社会干预试验将增强现有应对技能,并为那些苦苦挣扎的人建立应对机制。

结论

调查结果表明,如果解决特定障碍,在NHS内为癌症患者及康复者进行心理社会干预的RCT招募工作将是可行的。从临床医生的角度来看,应解决障碍以改善招募工作,特别是对临床医生的培训和教育以及清晰的沟通。从患者的角度来看,干预措施和RCT应进行调整,以针对那些在RCT中通常未被代表的人群。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Hypothesis testing, type I and type II errors.假设检验、I型错误和II型错误。
Ind Psychiatry J. 2009 Jul;18(2):127-31. doi: 10.4103/0972-6748.62274.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验