University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211009699. doi: 10.1177/21501327211009699.
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: In February 2019, recruitment began in Iowa Research Network offices for a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) funded Advance Care Planning (ACP) study to be conducted in 7 primary care practice-based research networks across the United States and Canada. The main study trained clinicians and nursing staff in serious illness care conversations and requested they refer eligible patients. Eligible patients were those with serious illness or frailty expected to live 1 to 2 years. Clinicians indicated it was difficult to identify eligible patients. This study aimed to find better methods for increasing patient recruitment for the ACP study.
Research staff brainstormed and implemented strategies to increase patient referrals from clinicians. Participating offices used Epic for their medical record and the Gagne Index was used to generate a list of eligible patients in Epic SlicerDicer. When patients from the Epic SlicerDicer report appeared on the schedule, clinicians and nursing staff were notified that they might be eligible for ACP. Clinicians and nursing staff were asked to complete a survey identifying their perception of implemented strategies. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted to compare referral numbers before and after the Gagne Index/Epic SlicerDicer intervention.
Seven clinicians referred patients prior to and 11 after the Gagne Index/Epic SlicerDicer intervention. Clinicians referred a total of 120 patients; 31 patients prior to and 89 patients after the Gagne Index/Epic SlicerDicer implementation ( = .002). Survey results indicated that several strategies facilitated clinician referrals, including patients identified as potentially appropriate on the schedule, quarterly meetings with researchers, and e-mails with a list of potentially eligible patients.
Notifying clinical staff about potential study participants increased patient referrals in this ACP study. Research staff must have time, funding, and patience to support clinical staff who are expected to refer patients to studies.
简介/目的:2019 年 2 月,在美国和加拿大的 7 个初级保健实践研究网络中,开始在爱荷华州研究网络办公室招募患者为中心的成果研究所(PCORI)资助的预先医疗指示(ACP)研究,该研究由患者为中心的成果研究所资助。主要研究对临床医生和护理人员进行了严重疾病护理对话培训,并要求他们转介符合条件的患者。符合条件的患者是指患有严重疾病或虚弱预计存活 1 至 2 年的患者。临床医生表示,很难确定符合条件的患者。这项研究旨在找到更好的方法来增加 ACP 研究的患者招募。
研究人员集思广益并实施了增加临床医生转介患者的策略。参与的办公室使用 Epic 记录医疗记录,Gagne 指数用于在 Epic SlicerDicer 中生成符合条件的患者列表。当 Epic SlicerDicer 报告中的患者出现在日程上时,临床医生和护理人员会收到通知,他们可能符合 ACP 条件。临床医生和护理人员被要求完成一项调查,以确定他们对实施策略的看法。采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较 Gagne 指数/Epic SlicerDicer 干预前后的转诊数量。
在 Gagne 指数/Epic SlicerDicer 干预前,有 7 名临床医生转介了患者,而在 Gagne 指数/Epic SlicerDicer 干预后,有 11 名临床医生转介了患者。临床医生共转介了 120 名患者;在 Gagne 指数/Epic SlicerDicer 实施前转介了 31 名患者,而在 Gagne 指数/Epic SlicerDicer 实施后转介了 89 名患者( = .002)。调查结果表明,一些策略促进了临床医生的转诊,包括在日程上被认为可能适合的患者、与研究人员的季度会议以及带有潜在符合条件患者列表的电子邮件。
通知临床工作人员有关潜在研究参与者的信息增加了该 ACP 研究中的患者转诊。研究人员必须有时间、资金和耐心来支持预计向研究转介患者的临床人员。