Nieuwoudt Sara, Manderson Lenore
1School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, 1 Jan Smuts Avenue, Braamfontein, Johannesburg, 2000 South Africa.
2Developmental Pathways Health and Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, 1 Jan Smuts Avenue, Braamfontein, Johannesburg, 2000 South Africa.
Int Breastfeed J. 2018 Jun 7;13:20. doi: 10.1186/s13006-018-0164-y. eCollection 2018.
Mothers rely heavily on health worker advice to make infant feeding decisions. Confusing or misleading advice can lead to suboptimal feeding practices. From 2001, HIV positive mothers in South Africa were counseled to choose either exclusive breastfeeding or exclusive formula feeding to minimize vertical HIV transmission. On the basis of revised World Health Organization guidelines, the government amended this policy in 2011, by promoting exclusive breastfeeding and discontinuing the provision of free formula. We explored how health workers experienced this new policy in an HIV endemic community in 2015-16, with attention to their knowledge of the policy, counselling practices, and observations of any changes.
We interviewed eleven health workers, from four community health clinics, who had counseled mothers before and after the policy change. The transcribed interviews were analyzed thematically, using a hybrid coding approach.
The scientific rationale of the policy was not explained to most health workers, who mostly thought that the discontinuation of the formula program was cost-related. The content of their counseling reflected knowledge about promoting breastfeeding for all women, and accordingly they mentioned the nutritional and developmental benefits of breastfeeding. The importance of exclusive breastfeeding for all infants was not emphasized, instead counseling focused on HIV prevention, even for uninfected mothers. The health workers noted an increased incidence of breastfeeding, but some worried that to avoid HIV disclosure, HIV positive mothers were mixed feeding rather than exclusively breastfeeding.
Causal links between the policy, counseling content and feeding practices were unclear. Some participants believed that breastfeeding practices were driven by finance or family pressures rather than the health information they provided. Health workers generally lacked training on the policy's evidence base, particularly the health benefits of exclusive breastfeeding for non-exposed infants. They wanted clarity on their counseling role, based on individual risk or to promote exclusive breastfeeding as a single option. If the latter, they needed training on how to assist mothers with community-based barriers. Infant feeding messages from health workers are likely to remain confusing until their uncertainties are addressed. Their insights should inform future guideline development as key actors.
母亲在做出婴儿喂养决策时严重依赖卫生工作者的建议。混淆或误导性的建议可能导致不理想的喂养方式。从2001年起,南非的艾滋病毒呈阳性的母亲们被建议选择纯母乳喂养或纯配方奶喂养,以尽量减少垂直传播艾滋病毒。根据世界卫生组织修订后的指南,政府于2011年修订了这一政策,提倡纯母乳喂养并停止提供免费配方奶。我们探讨了2015年至2016年期间,卫生工作者在一个艾滋病毒流行社区中如何体验这一新政策,重点关注他们对该政策的了解、咨询做法以及对任何变化的观察。
我们采访了来自四个社区卫生诊所的11名卫生工作者,他们在政策变更前后都为母亲提供过咨询。对转录的访谈进行了主题分析,采用混合编码方法。
大多数卫生工作者并未被告知该政策的科学依据,他们大多认为停止配方奶项目与成本有关。他们咨询的内容反映了关于促进所有女性母乳喂养的知识,因此他们提到了母乳喂养的营养和发育益处。并未强调纯母乳喂养对所有婴儿的重要性,相反,咨询重点放在了艾滋病毒预防上,即使是对未感染艾滋病毒的母亲也是如此。卫生工作者注意到母乳喂养的发生率有所增加,但一些人担心为了避免披露艾滋病毒感染情况,艾滋病毒呈阳性的母亲们采用混合喂养而非纯母乳喂养。
政策、咨询内容和喂养方式之间的因果关系尚不清楚。一些参与者认为,母乳喂养方式是由经济或家庭压力驱动的,而非他们提供的健康信息。卫生工作者普遍缺乏关于该政策证据基础的培训,特别是关于非暴露婴儿纯母乳喂养的健康益处方面的培训。他们希望根据个体风险明确自己的咨询角色,或者将促进纯母乳喂养作为唯一选择。如果是后者,他们需要接受关于如何帮助母亲克服社区层面障碍的培训。在卫生工作者的不确定性得到解决之前,他们传达给母亲的婴儿喂养信息可能仍会令人困惑。他们的见解应作为关键因素为未来指南的制定提供参考。