• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外商直接投资对环境恶化指标的影响。

Influence of foreign direct investment on indicators of environmental degradation.

机构信息

Centre for Globalisation and Sustainability Research, Multimedia University Melaka, 75450, Cyberjaya, Malaysia.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Sep;25(25):24845-24859. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2562-5. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-018-2562-5
PMID:29931634
Abstract

This study aims to contribute to the existing literature by looking at the influence of foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions, carbon footprint, and ecological footprint. In order to realize the aim of this study, we have utilized the augmented mean group estimator, which is supported by common correlated effect mean group estimator in the analysis for 20 countries. The panel results reveal that foreign direct investment has no effect on environmental degradation indicators. The panel results further reveal that gross domestic product, energy consumption, and urbanization are the main contributors to environmental degradation. The results at country level show that foreign direct investment and urbanization increase pollution in the developing countries while they mitigate pollution in the developed countries. Moreover, gross domestic product and energy consumption increase pollution for both developed and developing countries, which includes China and the USA. The negative impact of foreign direct investment on environmental degradation in the developed countries can be explained on the basis that these countries have strong environmental regulations, which makes it almost impossible for dirty foreign industries to invest therein. From the output of this research, several policy recommendations are enumerated for the investigated countries.

摘要

这项研究旨在通过考察外国直接投资对二氧化碳排放、碳足迹和生态足迹的影响,为现有文献做出贡献。为了实现本研究的目标,我们利用了扩展均值组估计量,该估计量在对 20 个国家的分析中得到了共同相关效应均值组估计量的支持。面板结果表明,外国直接投资对环境退化指标没有影响。面板结果进一步表明,国内生产总值、能源消耗和城市化是环境退化的主要原因。国家层面的结果表明,外国直接投资和城市化增加了发展中国家的污染,而减少了发达国家的污染。此外,国内生产总值和能源消耗增加了发达国家和发展中国家的污染,其中包括中国和美国。外国直接投资对发达国家环境退化的负面影响可以解释为这些国家拥有严格的环境法规,这使得污染严重的外国产业几乎不可能在这些国家投资。根据这项研究的结果,为调查国家列举了几项政策建议。

相似文献

1
Influence of foreign direct investment on indicators of environmental degradation.外商直接投资对环境恶化指标的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Sep;25(25):24845-24859. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2562-5. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
2
Investigating the determinant factors of environmental quality (based on ecological carbon footprint index).研究环境质量的决定因素(基于生态碳足迹指数)。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Apr;26(10):10276-10291. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04452-3. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
3
Reinvestigating the pollution haven hypothesis: the nexus between foreign direct investments and environmental quality in G-20 countries.重新研究污染避难所假说:G20 国家外国直接投资与环境质量的关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(21):31330-31347. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17508-0. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
4
Analysing the influence of foreign direct investment and urbanization on the development of private financial system and its ecological footprint.分析外国直接投资和城市化对私人金融体系发展及其生态足迹的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(4):9624-9641. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22772-9. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
5
Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries.外国直接投资和可再生能源消费会影响二氧化碳排放吗?来自京都议定书附件国家的面板自回归分布滞后模型方法的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Nov;23(21):21669-21681. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7413-7. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
6
Does pollution haven hypothesis hold in newly industrialized countries? Evidence from ecological footprint.新兴工业化国家是否存在污染避难所假说?生态足迹的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Aug;26(23):23689-23695. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05614-z. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
7
The relationship between FDI, CO emissions, and energy consumption in Asia-Pacific economic cooperation countries.亚太经合组织成员国 FDI、CO 排放与能源消费的关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(15):42845-42862. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17494-3. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
8
Did carbon dioxide emission regulations inhibit investments? A provincial panel analysis of China.二氧化碳排放法规是否抑制了投资?来自中国省级面板数据的分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Sep;25(27):27297-27306. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2774-8. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
9
The impact of biomass energy consumption on pollution: evidence from 80 developed and developing countries.生物质能源消费对污染的影响:来自 80 个发达国家和发展中国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Aug;25(23):22641-22657. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2392-5. Epub 2018 May 30.
10
Energy consumption, FDI, and urbanization linkage in coastal Mediterranean countries: re-assessing the pollution haven hypothesis.沿海地中海国家的能源消耗、外国直接投资和城市化之间的联系:重新评估污染避难所假说。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Oct;27(28):35474-35487. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09521-6. Epub 2020 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Does foreign direct investment affect environmental degradation: Evidence from largest carbon intense countries.外国直接投资是否会影响环境恶化:来自最大碳密集型国家的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 21;19(11):e0314232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314232. eCollection 2024.
2
Foreign investments and load capacity factor in BRICS: the moderating role of environmental policy stringency.金砖国家的外国投资与负荷因子:环境政策严格程度的调节作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):11228-11242. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31814-9. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
3
Tourism-induced emission in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Panel Study for Oil-Producing and Non-oil-Producing countries.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of biomass energy consumption on pollution: evidence from 80 developed and developing countries.生物质能源消费对污染的影响:来自 80 个发达国家和发展中国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Aug;25(23):22641-22657. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2392-5. Epub 2018 May 30.
2
Log-transformation and its implications for data analysis.对数变换及其对数据分析的影响。
Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;26(2):105-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2014.02.009.
撒哈拉以南非洲的旅游引致排放:石油生产国和非石油生产国的面板研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(27):41725-41741. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18262-z. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
4
The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Environmental Pollution in China: Corruption Matters.外国直接投资对中国环境污染的影响:腐败问题很重要。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 5;17(18):6477. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186477.
5
Threshold Effects of Restraining Factors on China's Provincial Ecological Footprint in the Process of Urbanization.制约因素对中国城市化进程中省级生态足迹的阈值效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;17(7):2407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072407.
6
Dynamic common correlated effects of trade openness, FDI, and institutional performance on environmental quality: evidence from OIC countries.贸易开放、外国直接投资和制度绩效对环境质量的动态共同关联效应:来自 OIC 国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(11):11671-11682. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07768-7. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
7
Analysis on the nexus amid CO emissions, energy intensity, economic growth, and foreign direct investment in Belt and Road economies: does the level of income matter?分析 CO 排放、能源强度、经济增长和外国直接投资在“一带一路”经济体中的关系:收入水平是否重要?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(10):11387-11402. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07685-9. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
8
Does international cooperation affect CO emissions? Evidence from OECD countries.国际合作是否会影响二氧化碳排放?来自经合组织国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Mar;27(8):8548-8556. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07324-y. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
9
An empirical evaluation of financial development-carbon footprint nexus in One Belt and Road region.“一带一路”区域金融发展与碳足迹关系的实证评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Aug;26(24):25026-25036. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05757-z. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
10
Does pollution haven hypothesis hold in newly industrialized countries? Evidence from ecological footprint.新兴工业化国家是否存在污染避难所假说?生态足迹的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Aug;26(23):23689-23695. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05614-z. Epub 2019 Jun 15.