• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析 CO 排放、能源强度、经济增长和外国直接投资在“一带一路”经济体中的关系:收入水平是否重要?

Analysis on the nexus amid CO emissions, energy intensity, economic growth, and foreign direct investment in Belt and Road economies: does the level of income matter?

机构信息

Department of Statistics, School of Finance and Economic, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, People's Republic of China.

Institute of Applied Systems and Analysis (IASA), Faculty of Science, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(10):11387-11402. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07685-9. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-07685-9
PMID:31965501
Abstract

This study determines the relationship between economic growth, foreign direct investment, energy intensity, and carbon dioxide emissions along the Belt and Road initiative considering their income classification. The study employs data from 1995 to 2015, the panel unit root test, Westerlund cointegration test, augmented mean group estimation, and the Dumitrescu-Hurlin Granger causality test. The empirical results indicate that (1) the data from all income group had cross-sectional association; (2) the variables are integrated of order 1 after first difference; (3) The variables under discussion were cointegrated; (4) at 1% increase in energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions increased by 0.8606%, 0.9082%, 0.91815%, and 0.8043% in high-, upper-middle-, lower-middle-, and low-income countries, respectively; (5) a bidirectional causal relationship was found between foreign direct investment and carbon dioxide across all income groups. Energy intensity has a bidirectional association with carbon dioxide in low-, upper-middle-, and high-income countries but one-way association in lower-middle-income countries. These recent methodologies take cross-sectional dependence into account in their estimation and findings show that the causal affiliations together with long-run estimated effects amid employed variables are influenced by the different income levels of Belt and Road countries in a tender to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. The empirical results point to some important policy implications.

摘要

本研究考虑到收入分类,确定了沿“一带一路”倡议的经济增长、外国直接投资、能源强度和二氧化碳排放之间的关系。该研究使用了 1995 年至 2015 年的数据,面板单位根检验、Westerlund 协整检验、增强均值组估计和 Dumitrescu-Hurlin 格兰杰因果检验。实证结果表明:(1)所有收入组的数据都存在横截面关联;(2)变量经过一阶差分后是一阶整合的;(3)讨论中的变量是协整的;(4)能源消耗每增加 1%,高、上中、中下和低收入国家的二氧化碳排放量分别增加 0.8606%、0.9082%、0.91815%和 0.8043%;(5)在所有收入组中,外国直接投资和二氧化碳之间存在双向因果关系。能源强度与低、上中、高收入国家的二氧化碳之间存在双向关联,但与中下收入国家存在单向关联。这些最新方法在估计中考虑了横截面相关性,结果表明,在试图减少二氧化碳排放的过程中,“一带一路”国家不同的收入水平会影响所采用变量之间的因果关系以及长期估计效应。实证结果指出了一些重要的政策含义。

相似文献

1
Analysis on the nexus amid CO emissions, energy intensity, economic growth, and foreign direct investment in Belt and Road economies: does the level of income matter?分析 CO 排放、能源强度、经济增长和外国直接投资在“一带一路”经济体中的关系:收入水平是否重要?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(10):11387-11402. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07685-9. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
2
Effect of economic growth, energy use, trade openness and foreign direct investments on carbon dioxide emissions. Evidence from G8 countries.经济增长、能源利用、贸易开放和外国直接投资对二氧化碳排放的影响。八国集团国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Nov;30(53):113538-113552. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29827-5. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
3
Impact of financial development and economic growth on environmental quality: an empirical analysis from Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) countries.金融发展和经济增长对环境质量的影响:来自“一带一路”倡议(BRI)国家的实证分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jan;26(3):2253-2269. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3688-1. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
4
Reinvestigating the pollution haven hypothesis: the nexus between foreign direct investments and environmental quality in G-20 countries.重新研究污染避难所假说:G20 国家外国直接投资与环境质量的关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(21):31330-31347. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17508-0. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
5
Does Chinese foreign direct investment harm CO2 emissions in the Belt and Road Economies.中国对外直接投资是否损害“一带一路”经济体的二氧化碳排放。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(26):39528-39544. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18357-7. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
6
Financial development, globalization, and CO emission in the presence of EKC: evidence from BRICS countries.金融发展、全球化与 CO 排放的 EKC 关系:金砖国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Nov;25(31):31283-31296. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3034-7. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
7
Do financial development, FDI, and globalization intensify environmental degradation through the channel of energy consumption: evidence from belt and road countries.金融发展、外国直接投资和全球化是否通过能源消耗渠道加剧了环境恶化:来自“一带一路”国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(2):2753-2772. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15796-0. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
8
Investigating the nexus among environmental pollution, economic growth, energy use, and foreign direct investment in 6 selected sub-Saharan African countries.调查撒哈拉以南非洲 6 个选定国家的环境污染、经济增长、能源利用和外国直接投资之间的关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Apr;26(11):11245-11260. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04455-0. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
9
Determinants of CO emissions in upper middle-income group countries: an empirical investigation.高收入国家二氧化碳排放的决定因素:一项实证调查。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Oct;27(30):37745-37759. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09803-z. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
10
The relationship between FDI, CO emissions, and energy consumption in Asia-Pacific economic cooperation countries.亚太经合组织成员国 FDI、CO 排放与能源消费的关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(15):42845-42862. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17494-3. Epub 2021 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic growth and electricity consumption: Fresh evidence of panel data for LAC.经济增长与电力消费:拉丁美洲和加勒比地区面板数据的新证据
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 25;10(13):e33521. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33521. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
2
Does green investment reduce carbon emissions? New evidence from partially linear functional-coefficient models.绿色投资能减少碳排放吗?来自部分线性函数系数模型的新证据。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 5;9(9):e19838. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19838. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Environmental technology, economic complexity, renewable electricity, environmental taxes and CO2 emissions: Implications for low-carbon future in G-10 bloc.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of financial development, economic growth & foreign direct investment in driving climate change: A case of emerging ASEAN.金融发展、经济增长和外国直接投资在推动气候变化方面的作用:以新兴东盟为例。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Jul 15;242:131-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.112. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
2
The nexus between financial development, income level, and environment in Central and Eastern European Countries: a perspective on Belt and Road Initiative.中东欧国家金融发展、收入水平与环境的关系:“一带一路”倡议视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jun;26(16):16053-16075. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05004-5. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
3
环境技术、经济复杂性、可再生电力、环境税与二氧化碳排放:对G-10集团低碳未来的影响
Heliyon. 2023 May 22;9(6):e16457. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16457. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Why are some countries cleaner than others? New evidence from macroeconomic governance.为什么有些国家比其他国家更清洁?来自宏观经济治理的新证据。
Environ Dev Sustain. 2023;25(7):6167-6223. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02298-3. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
5
What is the relationship between government response and COVID-19 pandemics? Global evidence of 118 countries.政府应对措施与新冠疫情之间的关系是什么?来自118个国家的全球证据。
Struct Chang Econ Dyn. 2021 Dec;59:98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
6
Foreign aid and economic growth: Do energy consumption, trade openness and CO2 emissions matter? A DSUR heterogeneous evidence from Africa's trading blocs.外援与经济增长:能源消耗、贸易开放度和二氧化碳排放是否重要?来自非洲贸易集团的 DSUR 异质证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 25;16(6):e0253457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253457. eCollection 2021.
Impact of financial development and economic growth on environmental quality: an empirical analysis from Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) countries.
金融发展和经济增长对环境质量的影响:来自“一带一路”倡议(BRI)国家的实证分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jan;26(3):2253-2269. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3688-1. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
4
The impact of economic growth, energy consumption, trade openness, and financial development on carbon emissions: empirical evidence from Turkey.经济增长、能源消耗、贸易开放度和金融发展对碳排放的影响:来自土耳其的经验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Dec;25(36):36589-36603. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3526-5. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
5
Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: The role of energy and financial development.生态足迹的环境库兹涅茨曲线研究:能源和金融发展的作用。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 10;650(Pt 2):2483-2489. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.017. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
6
The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in CO emissions: a disaggregate analysis of Pakistan.可再生能源和不可再生能源消费在 CO 排放中的作用:巴基斯坦的非综合分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Nov;25(31):31616-31629. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3059-y. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
7
Financial development, globalization, and CO emission in the presence of EKC: evidence from BRICS countries.金融发展、全球化与 CO 排放的 EKC 关系:金砖国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Nov;25(31):31283-31296. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3034-7. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
8
Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries.发展中国家外国直接投资、经济发展和能源消耗对温室气体排放的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jan 1;646:862-871. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.365. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
9
The dynamic links between CO emissions, energy consumption and economic development in the countries along "the Belt and Road".“一带一路”国家的 CO 排放、能源消耗与经济发展的动态联系。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Dec 15;645:674-683. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.062. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
10
Influence of foreign direct investment on indicators of environmental degradation.外商直接投资对环境恶化指标的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Sep;25(25):24845-24859. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2562-5. Epub 2018 Jun 21.