Riedl Bernhard, Kehrer Simon, Werner Christoph U, Schneider Antonius, Linde Klaus
Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Institute of General Practice, Orleansstrasse 47, 81667, Munich, Germany.
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jun 23;19(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0787-5.
Even in practices with a comprehensive appointment system a minority of patients walks in without prior notice, sometimes causing problems for practice service quality. We aimed to explore differences between patients consulting primary care practices with and without appointment.
Consecutive patients visiting five primary care practices without an appointment and following patients with an appointment were asked to fill in a four-page questionnaire addressing socio-demographic characteristics, the reason for encounter, urgency of seeing a physician, depressive, somatic and anxiety symptoms, personality traits, and satisfaction with the practice. Physicians also documented the reason for encounter and assessed the urgency. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods.
Two hundred fifty-one patients without and 250 patients with appointment participated. Patients without appointment were significantly younger (mean age 44 vs. 50 years) and reported less often chronic diseases (29% vs. 45%). Also, reasons for encounter differed (e.g., 27% vs. 16% with a respiratory problem). Patients' ratings of urgency did not differ between groups (p = 0.46), but physicians rated urgency higher among patients without appointment (p < 0.001). In logistic regression analyses younger age, male gender, absence of chronic disease, positive screening for at least one mental disorder, low values on the personality trait openness for experience, a high urgency rating by the physician, and a respiratory or musculoskeletal problem as reason for encounter were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of being a patient without appointment.
In this study, younger age and a high urgency rating by physicians were the variables most consistently associated with the likelihood of being a patient without appointment. Overall, differences between patients seeking general practices with a comprehensive appointment system without prior notice and patients with appointments were relatively minor.
即使在实行全面预约系统的医疗机构中,仍有少数患者未提前预约就前来就诊,有时会给医疗服务质量带来问题。我们旨在探讨预约就诊和未预约就诊的初级医疗患者之间的差异。
连续招募五家初级医疗诊所未预约就诊的患者以及随后预约就诊的患者,要求他们填写一份四页的问卷,内容涉及社会人口学特征、就诊原因、看医生的紧迫性、抑郁、躯体和焦虑症状、人格特质以及对诊所的满意度。医生也记录了就诊原因并评估了紧迫性。采用单变量和多变量方法对数据进行分析。
251名未预约就诊的患者和250名预约就诊的患者参与了研究。未预约就诊的患者明显更年轻(平均年龄44岁对50岁),且慢性病患者较少(29%对45%)。此外,就诊原因也有所不同(例如,有呼吸问题的患者分别为27%和16%)。两组患者对紧迫性的评分没有差异(p = 0.46),但医生对未预约就诊患者的紧迫性评分更高(p < 0.001)。在逻辑回归分析中,年龄较小、男性、无慢性病、至少一种精神障碍筛查呈阳性、人格特质开放性体验得分低、医生的紧迫性评分高以及呼吸或肌肉骨骼问题作为就诊原因与未预约就诊的可能性显著相关。
在本研究中,年龄较小和医生的紧迫性评分高是与未预约就诊可能性最一致相关的变量。总体而言,在实行全面预约系统的情况下,未提前预约就诊的患者与预约就诊的患者之间的差异相对较小。