• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定一种客观、统一的评分方法,以评估荷兰奶牛场的饲养质量。

Development of an objective and uniform scoring method to evaluate the quality of rearing in Dutch dairy herds.

机构信息

GD Animal Health, PO Box 9, 7400 AA Deventer, the Netherlands.

GD Animal Health, PO Box 9, 7400 AA Deventer, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2018 Sep;101(9):8383-8395. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14460. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

DOI:10.3168/jds.2018-14460
PMID:29935818
Abstract

Young stock rearing is an essential part of dairy management, and it is important that the quality of rearing can be monitored and altered if necessary. In this study, a young stock rearing quality system (KalfOK) was developed with the aim to provide an objective and standardized means to evaluate and monitor the quality of young stock rearing in Dutch dairy herds. In the project, 201 dairy farmers participated. Twelve key indicators were defined that were related to calving and successful rearing, antimicrobial use, and herd health. For each of the key indicators, the value was calculated per herd and quarter of the year between January 2014 and April 2017. Benchmark values were determined to compare herd-specific results and for selection of threshold values. Each of the key indicators was graded when the value scored above the threshold. Combining the grades resulted in the herd-specific KalfOK score, which could vary between 0 and 100. Subsequently, 100 of the participating dairy herds were visited and the quality of young stock rearing was scored by a trained veterinarian. Using principal component analysis, the results of the herd health checks were combined into a factor score that represented the observed quality of young stock rearing during the visit. The amount of variance in observed quality of rearing during the herd health check that was explained by the key indicators in KalfOK was evaluated. Additionally, the validity of KalfOK to distinguish herds with an excellent or insufficient quality of young stock rearing was assessed by comparing the top and bottom 10% herds in the herd health check with the proportion of herds with a KalfOK score above or below a prespecified cutoff value. The results of the linear regression model showed that the key indicators included in KalfOK accounted for 56% of the variation in the score of the herd visits by a veterinarian. The moving average of the annual KalfOK score, which was the sum of the grades of all key indicators, was 77 points (25th percentile = 71, 75th percentile = 85 points). The combination of the sensitivity (88%, 95% confidence interval = 47-100%) and specificity (67%, 95% confidence interval = 54-78%) of KalfOK to correctly classify herds with an excellent quality of young stock rearing was highest when a cutoff value of 80 points was applied. Detection of dairy herds with an insufficient quality of young stock rearing was best at a cutoff value of 70 points (sensitivity 86%, 95% confidence interval = 42-100%; specificity 77%, 95% confidence interval = 66-86%). The KalfOK score that was based on routinely collected herd data provided an indication of the quality of young stock rearing in individual Dutch dairy farms. The KalfOK score illustrates how such data can be transferred into herd-specific information in support of animal health and welfare. Given the increasing availability of automatically assembled data, the development of similar monitoring tools seems a feasible option to enhance herd-specific management.

摘要

青年牛饲养是奶牛管理的重要组成部分,重要的是能够监测饲养质量,如果有必要,可以进行调整。在这项研究中,开发了一个青年牛饲养质量系统(KalfOK),旨在提供一种客观和标准化的方法来评估和监测荷兰奶牛场的青年牛饲养质量。该项目有 201 名奶牛场主参与。定义了 12 个关键指标,这些指标与产犊和成功饲养、抗菌药物使用和畜群健康有关。对于每个关键指标,都按每头奶牛和每年的 1 月至 4 月进行计算。确定了基准值,以便比较特定畜群的结果和选择阈值。当值超过阈值时,对每个关键指标进行评分。将评分组合起来得到特定畜群的 KalfOK 评分,该评分可以在 0 到 100 之间变化。随后,对 100 个参与的奶牛场进行了访问,并由经过培训的兽医对青年牛饲养质量进行了评分。使用主成分分析,将畜群健康检查的结果组合成一个因子得分,代表在访问期间观察到的青年牛饲养质量。评估了 KalfOK 中关键指标在畜群健康检查中观察到的饲养质量变化的方差量。此外,通过将畜群健康检查中得分最高和最低的 10%的畜群与 KalfOK 得分高于或低于预设截定点的畜群比例进行比较,评估了 KalfOK 区分具有优秀或较差青年牛饲养质量的畜群的有效性。线性回归模型的结果表明,KalfOK 中包含的关键指标解释了兽医畜群访问评分变化的 56%。每年 KalfOK 评分的移动平均值,即所有关键指标评分的总和,为 77 分(第 25 百分位数=71,第 75 百分位数=85 分)。当应用 80 分的截定点时,KalfOK 对正确分类具有优秀青年牛饲养质量的畜群的敏感性(88%,95%置信区间=47-100%)和特异性(67%,95%置信区间=54-78%)最高。当应用 70 分的截定点时,检测具有较差青年牛饲养质量的奶牛场的效果最佳(敏感性 86%,95%置信区间=42-100%;特异性 77%,95%置信区间=66-86%)。基于常规收集的畜群数据的 KalfOK 评分提供了个体荷兰奶牛场青年牛饲养质量的指示。KalfOK 评分说明了如何将此类数据转化为支持动物健康和福利的特定畜群信息。鉴于自动汇编数据的日益普及,开发类似的监测工具似乎是一种可行的选择,可以增强特定畜群的管理。

相似文献

1
Development of an objective and uniform scoring method to evaluate the quality of rearing in Dutch dairy herds.制定一种客观、统一的评分方法,以评估荷兰奶牛场的饲养质量。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Sep;101(9):8383-8395. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14460. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
2
Evaluation of a data-driven youngstock rearing quality system in Dutch dairy herds (2019-2022).荷兰奶牛场数据驱动的后备牛饲养质量体系评估(2019-2022 年)。
Prev Vet Med. 2024 Nov;232:106312. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106312. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
3
The optimal number of heifer calves to be reared as dairy replacements.作为奶牛后备牛饲养的小母牛犊的最佳数量。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Feb;98(2):861-71. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8329. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
4
An estimation of the clinical mastitis incidence per 100 cows per year based on routinely collected herd data.基于常规收集的牛群数据对每年每100头奶牛临床乳腺炎发病率的估计。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Oct;98(10):6965-77. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9642. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
5
Exploring the value of routinely collected herd data for estimating dairy cattle welfare.探索常规收集的畜群数据在评估奶牛福利方面的价值。
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Feb;97(2):715-30. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6585. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
6
The total cost of rearing a heifer on Dutch dairy farms: calculated versus perceived cost.荷兰奶牛场饲养一头小母牛的总成本:计算成本与感知成本
Ir Vet J. 2015 Dec 15;68:29. doi: 10.1186/s13620-015-0058-x. eCollection 2015.
7
Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in dairy farms.奶牛场中产超广谱β-内酰胺酶和AmpC酶的大肠杆菌的流行情况及危险因素
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Nov;99(11):9001-9013. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11134. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
8
Factors associated with high antimicrobial use in young calves on Dutch dairy farms: A case-control study.与荷兰奶牛场小牛高抗菌药物使用相关的因素:病例对照研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Oct;101(10):9259-9265. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-14252. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
9
A survey of Australian dairy farmers to investigate animal welfare risks associated with increasing scale of production.一项针对澳大利亚奶农的调查,以研究与生产规模扩大相关的动物福利风险。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Aug;98(8):5330-8. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9239. Epub 2015 May 23.
10
Can pre-collected register data be used to identify dairy herds with good cattle welfare?能否利用预先收集的登记数据来识别奶牛福利良好的奶牛场?
Acta Vet Scand. 2011;53 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-53-S1-S8. Epub 2011 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimation of genetic parameters of Holstein calf survival.荷斯坦犊牛存活的遗传参数估计。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024 Jan 15;56(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s11250-023-03874-z.
2
Monitoring bovine dairy calf health and related risk factors in the first three months of rearing.监测牛犊在饲养头三个月的健康状况和相关风险因素。
Acta Vet Scand. 2023 Oct 12;65(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13028-023-00708-8.
3
Denormalizing poor dairy youngstock management: dealing with "farm-blindness".使奶牛幼畜管理不善的情况正常化:应对“农场盲目性”。
J Anim Sci. 2020 Aug 18;98(Suppl 1):S140-S149. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa137.
4
Automated bioacoustics: methods in ecology and conservation and their potential for animal welfare monitoring.自动化生物声学:生态学和保护学中的方法及其在动物福利监测中的潜力。
J R Soc Interface. 2019 Jun 28;16(155):20190225. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0225. Epub 2019 Jun 19.