Gonggrijp M A, Santman-Berends I M G A, Heuvelink A E, Buter G J, van Schaik G, Hage J J, Lam T J G M
GD Animal Health, PO Box 9, 7400 AA Deventer, the Netherlands.
GD Animal Health, PO Box 9, 7400 AA Deventer, the Netherlands.
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Nov;99(11):9001-9013. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11134. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)- and plasmid-mediated AmpC-producing Escherichia coli and associated risk factors in dairy herds. One hundred dairy herds were randomly selected and sampled to study the presence of ESBL- and AmpC-producing E. coli in slurry samples. The sensitivity of testing slurry samples for ESBL/AmpC herd status is less than 100%, especially for detecting herds with a low ESBL/AmpC prevalence. Therefore, whereas herds that tested positive for ESBL/AmpC-producing E. coli in slurry were defined as positive herds, herds with negative slurry samples were defined as unsuspected. Isolates of ESBL- and AmpC-producing E. coli were further characterized by detection and typing of their ESBL/AmpC gene. At the initial sampling, a comprehensive questionnaire was conducted at the participating farms. The farmers were asked questions about management practices potentially associated with the ESBL/AMPC herd status. Also, data on antimicrobial purchases during 2011 were acquired to evaluate whether the animal-defined daily dose of antimicrobials per year at farm level was associated with the ESBL/AmpC herd status. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between management practices and the ESBL/AmpC herd status. Six months after the initial slurry sampling, 10 positive herds and 10 herds that had an unsuspected ESBL/AmpC herd status during the first visit were resampled. At each farm, slurry samples and feces from 24 individual cows were collected to evaluate within herd dynamics. During the first sampling, ESBL/AmpC-producing E. coli were isolated from the slurry samples collected at 41% of the herds. In total, 37 isolates were further characterized, revealing 7 different ESBL genes (bla and bla), 1 plasmid-encoded AmpC gene (bla), and 1 chromosomally encoded ampC gene (ampC type 3). The total animal-defined daily dose of antimicrobials per year at farm level was not significantly different between ESBL/AmpC-positive and unsuspected dairy herds. The use of third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, however, was found to be associated with ESBL/AmpC status, with higher use of these antimicrobials resulting in a significant higher odds to be ESBL/AmpC-positive. Management factors that were associated with a higher odds of being ESBL/AmpC-positive were treatment of all cases of clinical mastitis with antimicrobials, a higher proportion of calves treated with antimicrobials, not applying teat sealants in all cows at dry off, and the use of a floor scraper. This last association, however, was considered a methodological effect rather than a true risk factor. On 5 of the 10 initially positive farms, no ESBL/AmpC-producing E. coli were cultured from the slurry or any of the individual cow samples collected during the second sampling. In 4 of the initially unsuspected farms, slurry or individual cow samples tested positive during the second sampling. In conclusion, ESBL/AmpC could frequently be cultured from slurry samples collected from Dutch dairy farms and the ESBL/AmpC genes carried by the isolates were consistent with those reported earlier. The use of third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins appeared to be associated the ESBL/AmpC herd status.
开展了一项横断面研究,以评估产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)和质粒介导的AmpC的大肠杆菌在奶牛场中的流行情况及相关风险因素。随机选择100个奶牛场并进行采样,以研究粪便样本中产ESBL和AmpC的大肠杆菌的存在情况。检测粪便样本中ESBL/AmpC牛群状态的敏感性低于100%,尤其是对于检测ESBL/AmpC流行率低的牛群。因此,虽然在粪便中检测出产ESBL/AmpC大肠杆菌呈阳性的牛群被定义为阳性牛群,但粪便样本呈阴性的牛群被定义为未受怀疑的牛群。通过检测和分型产ESBL和AmpC大肠杆菌的ESBL/AmpC基因,对其进行进一步鉴定。在初次采样时,对参与的农场进行了全面问卷调查。向农民询问了可能与ESBL/AMPC牛群状态相关的管理措施。此外,获取了2011年期间抗菌药物采购数据,以评估农场层面每年动物定义的抗菌药物每日剂量是否与ESBL/AmpC牛群状态相关。使用多变量逻辑回归模型来确定管理措施与ESBL/AmpC牛群状态之间的关联。在初次粪便采样6个月后,对10个阳性牛群和10个在首次访查时ESBL/AmpC牛群状态未受怀疑的牛群再次进行采样。在每个农场,收集粪便样本和24头个体奶牛的粪便,以评估牛群内部动态。在首次采样期间,从41%的牛场收集的粪便样本中分离出产ESBL/AmpC的大肠杆菌。总共对37株分离菌进行了进一步鉴定,发现了7种不同的ESBL基因(bla和bla)、1种质粒编码的AmpC基因(bla)和1种染色体编码的ampC基因(ampC 3型)。农场层面每年动物定义的抗菌药物每日总剂量在ESBL/AmpC阳性和未受怀疑的奶牛场之间无显著差异。然而,发现第三代和第四代头孢菌素的使用与ESBL/AmpC状态相关,这些抗菌药物的使用量越高,ESBL/AmpC呈阳性的几率显著越高。与ESBL/AmpC呈阳性几率较高相关的管理因素包括用抗菌药物治疗所有临床乳腺炎病例、用抗菌药物治疗的犊牛比例较高、干奶期并非对所有奶牛都使用乳头封闭剂以及使用地面刮板。然而,最后这种关联被认为是一种方法学效应,而非真正的风险因素。在最初10个呈阳性的农场中的5个农场,在第二次采样期间,从粪便或任何个体奶牛样本中均未培养出产ESBL/AmpC的大肠杆菌。在最初未受怀疑的4个农场中,粪便或个体奶牛样本在第二次采样时检测呈阳性。总之,从荷兰奶牛场收集的粪便样本中经常能培养出产ESBL/AmpC的大肠杆菌,分离菌携带的ESBL/AmpC基因与先前报道的一致。第三代和第四代头孢菌素的使用似乎与ESBL/AmpC牛群状态相关。