Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Oct;106(4):973-980. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.05.056. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
Body mass index (BMI) is not routinely taken into consideration for risk stratification prior to esophagectomy. Extremes of BMI are associated with adverse surgical outcomes in a variety of surgical specialties. We assessed the relationship of BMI to outcomes after esophagectomy for cancer.
Patients in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (2009 to 2016) who underwent elective esophagectomy for cancer were selected for analysis. Open and minimally invasive approaches were included. Complications were categorized based on the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group recommendations. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounding variables.
We evaluated 9,389 patients grouped by BMI: underweight (<18.5 kg/m; 3%), normal (18.5 to 24.9 kg/m; 32%), overweight (25 to 29.9 kg/m; 36%), obese I (30 to 34.9 kg/m; 19%), obese II (35 to 39.9 kg/m; 7%), and obese III (≥40 kg/m; 3%). Most patients underwent open Ivor Lewis (33%), open transhiatal (23%), or minimally invasive Ivor Lewis (22%) approaches. The operative mortality rate was 3.4%; the frequency of complications by category ranged from 4% to 28%. On multivariable analysis, overall differences were identified among BMI categories for 7 out of 9 complication types. Underweight and obese III categories were associated with increased risk. In contrast, overweight and obese I BMI were associated with decreased risk for most complication types.
BMI is associated with postoperative complications after esophagectomy. Postoperative risk assessment and prehabilitation regimens should be adjusted accordingly when planning an esophagectomy for a patient with very low or very high BMI.
在接受食管癌切除术之前,通常不会考虑体重指数(BMI)来进行风险分层。在许多外科专业中,BMI 的极端值与不良的手术结果有关。我们评估了 BMI 与食管癌切除术患者术后结果之间的关系。
从胸外科医师学会普通胸外科数据库(2009 年至 2016 年)中选择接受择期食管癌切除术治疗癌症的患者进行分析。纳入开放和微创方法。并发症根据食管癌并发症共识小组的建议进行分类。多变量逻辑回归用于调整混杂变量。
我们评估了 9389 名按 BMI 分组的患者:体重不足(<18.5kg/m;3%)、正常(18.5-24.9kg/m;32%)、超重(25-29.9kg/m;36%)、肥胖 I(30-34.9kg/m;19%)、肥胖 II(35-39.9kg/m;7%)和肥胖 III(≥40kg/m;3%)。大多数患者接受了开放 Ivor Lewis(33%)、开放经胸(23%)或微创 Ivor Lewis(22%)方法。手术死亡率为 3.4%;各并发症类型的发生率范围为 4%-28%。多变量分析显示,9 种并发症类型中有 7 种在 BMI 类别之间存在总体差异。体重不足和肥胖 III 类别与风险增加相关。相比之下,超重和肥胖 I BMI 与大多数并发症类型的风险降低相关。
BMI 与食管癌切除术的术后并发症有关。当为 BMI 非常低或非常高的患者计划进行食管癌切除术时,应相应调整术后风险评估和康复方案。