Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research (CHARR), School of Physiotherapy Christchurch, University of Otago, PO Box 4345, Christchurch Mail Centre 8140, New Zealand.
Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research (CHARR), School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Disabil Health J. 2018 Oct;11(4):525-536. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 May 24.
Fitness centers could be ideal places for people with disabilities to engage in the recommended levels of physical activity for healthy well-being. However, one of the primary barriers to participation at fitness centers is an inaccessible built environment.
This review study aimed to evaluate the accessibility of public indoor fitness centers for people with disabilities.
We searched electronic databases and web based search engines using keywords and synonyms for fitness centers, people with disability and accessibility. Observational studies that used standardized measures to evaluate fitness centers were included and critically appraised using a modified version of the checklist for randomized and non-randomized studies developed by Downs and Black. We analyzed the data descriptively. This systematic review protocol is registered in PROSPERO (ID:CRD42016043945).
A total of 533 fitness centers were evaluated for accessibility across 14 studies. Ten (85%) of the 14 studies were undertaken in the United States of America. Instruments (n = 2) used to evaluate fitness centers were based on the Americans with Disabilities Act compliance legislation and measured domains of physical access (e.g., bathrooms, equipment, parking) and system access (e.g., policies, programs, professional behavior). We calculated weighted percentage mean scores per accessibility domain. The least accessible domain was "hot tubs/whirlpools/saunas/steam rooms" at 33%, with "programs" being the most accessible domain at 68%.
Fitness center accessibility for people with disabilities remains poor. Adopting the principles of universal design in legislation would achieve equitable access for all, thereby allowing people with disabilities to participate actively in their communities with dignity and autonomy.
健身中心可为残疾人参与推荐的身体活动水平以实现健康福祉提供理想场所。然而,参与健身中心的主要障碍之一是无障碍的建筑环境。
本综述研究旨在评估公共室内健身中心对残疾人的可达性。
我们使用健身中心、残疾人和可达性的关键词和同义词在电子数据库和网络搜索引擎中进行了搜索。纳入了使用标准化措施评估健身中心的观察性研究,并使用由 Downs 和 Black 开发的随机和非随机研究检查表的修改版本对其进行了批判性评估。我们对数据进行了描述性分析。本系统评价方案已在 PROSPERO(注册号:CRD42016043945)中注册。
共有 14 项研究评估了 533 个健身中心的可达性。这 14 项研究中有 10 项(85%)是在美国进行的。用于评估健身中心的仪器(n=2)基于《美国残疾人法案》合规立法,并测量了物理可达性(例如,浴室、设备、停车)和系统可达性(例如,政策、计划、专业行为)的领域。我们计算了每个可达性领域的加权百分比平均得分。最不具备可达性的领域是“热水浴缸/漩涡浴/桑拿/蒸汽房”,为 33%,而“计划”是最具可达性的领域,为 68%。
残疾人使用健身中心的可达性仍然很差。在立法中采用通用设计原则将实现所有人的公平准入,从而使残疾人能够有尊严和自主地积极参与他们的社区。