Arbour-Nicitopoulos Kelly P, Ginis Kathleen A Martin
Department of Kinesiology, Centre for Health Promotion and Rehabilitation, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2011 Jan;28(1):1-15. doi: 10.1123/apaq.28.1.1.
This study descriptively measured the universal accessibility of "accessible" fitness and recreational facilities for Ontarians living with mobility disabilities. The physical and social environments of 44 fitness and recreational facilities that identified as "accessible" were assessed using a modified version of the AIMFREE. None of the 44 facilities were completely accessible. Mean accessibility ratings ranged between 31 and 63 out of a possible 100. Overall, recreational facilities had higher accessibility scores than fitness centers, with significant differences found on professional support and training, entrance areas, and parking lot. A modest correlation was found between the availability of fitness programming and the overall accessibility of fitness-center specific facility areas. Overall, the physical and social environments of the 44 fitness and recreational facilities assessed were limited in their accessibility for persons with mobility disabilities. Future efforts should be directed at establishing and meeting universal accessibility guidelines for Canadian physical activity facilities.
本研究以描述性方式衡量了安大略省行动不便的居民对“无障碍”健身和娱乐设施的普遍可达性。使用修改版的AIMFREE对44个自认为“无障碍”的健身和娱乐设施的物理和社会环境进行了评估。这44个设施中没有一个是完全无障碍的。平均可达性评分在满分100分中介于31分至63分之间。总体而言,娱乐设施的可达性得分高于健身中心,在专业支持与培训、入口区域和停车场方面存在显著差异。在健身项目的可用性与健身中心特定设施区域的总体可达性之间发现了适度的相关性。总体而言,所评估的44个健身和娱乐设施的物理和社会环境对行动不便者的可达性有限。未来的工作应致力于制定并满足加拿大体育活动设施的普遍可达性准则。