Philosophy Department, CUNY Graduate Center, New York City, New York, USA.
Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
J Med Ethics. 2018 Nov;44(11):774-781. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104811. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
While a significant body of bioethical literature considers how the placebo effect might introduce a conflict between autonomy and beneficence, the link between justice and the placebo effect has been neglected. Here, we bring together disparate evidence from the field of placebo studies and research on health inequalities related to race and ethnicity, and argue that, collectively, this evidence may provide the basis for an unacknowledged route by which health disparities are exacerbated. This route is constituted by an uneven distribution of placebo effects, resulting from differences in expressions of physician warmth and empathy, as well as support and patient engagement, across racial and ethnic lines. In a discussion of the ethical implications of this connection, we argue that this contribution to health disparities is a source of injustice, consider ways in which these disparities might be ameliorated and suggest that this conclusion is likely to extend to other realms of inequality as well.
尽管大量的生物伦理文献都在探讨安慰剂效应如何在自主性和功利主义之间产生冲突,但人们忽视了正义与安慰剂效应之间的联系。在这里,我们汇集了安慰剂研究领域和与种族和民族相关的健康不平等研究中相互分离的证据,并认为这些证据可能为一条尚未被认识到的途径提供了依据,通过这条途径,健康差异会被加剧。这条途径是由安慰剂效应的不均衡分布构成的,这种分布是由于医生的热情和同理心的表达,以及支持和患者参与度在种族和民族之间的差异造成的。在讨论这种联系的伦理含义时,我们认为,这种对健康差异的贡献是不公正的根源,考虑了减轻这些差异的方法,并认为这一结论很可能扩展到其他不平等领域。