• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

降低糖化血红蛋白对控制不佳的糖尿病患者医疗成本的影响。

Impact of Reducing Glycated Hemoglobin on Healthcare Costs Among a Population with Uncontrolled Diabetes.

机构信息

Medtronic, 18000 Devonshire Street, Northridge, CA, 91325, USA.

Medtronic, 18302 Talavera Ridge, San Antonio, TX, 78257, USA.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Oct;16(5):675-684. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0398-2.

DOI:10.1007/s40258-018-0398-2
PMID:29936685
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Glycated hemoglobin (A1C) is considered a "gold standard" measure of glycemic control in patients with diabetes and is correlated with a lower risk of diabetes complications and cost savings. This retrospective claims-analysis assessed the impact of A1C reduction on healthcare costs in patients with uncontrolled Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Using a large repository of US health plan administrative data linked to A1C values, patients with a diabetes diagnosis and at least two A1C values between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2014 were selected to identify changes in A1C and associated changes in healthcare expenditure. We used all medical and pharmacy claims to calculate direct healthcare costs from 1 year prior to the index A1C to 2 years after the index A1C. A propensity score method was used to match patients with decreased A1C to patients whose A1C did not decrease, based on potentially confounding variables. Then, a generalized linear model regression was used to estimate the difference-in-difference (DD) effect on costs between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of the 3,197 patients who had a first A1C ≥ 9%, 2,273 patients (71%) had a decrease in A1C (Decreasers) and 924 patients (27%) had an increase in A1C (Non-decreasers). After matching, we compared 912 Decreasers to 912 Non-decreasers. Patients in the former group had average annual healthcare costs that were 24% lower during the first year of follow-up and 17% lower during the second year of follow-up, compared to patients whose A1C did not decrease. This reflected a savings of US$2503 and US$1690, respectively. For both time periods, the outpatient category was the largest contributor to cost savings.

DISCUSSION

In our analysis, A1C reduction among patients with T1DM and T2DM was associated with slower growth in healthcare costs within 1-2 years. These findings suggest that programs aimed at reducing A1C over a short timeframe may lead to substantial savings and may be worth pursuing by health plans and other payers.

摘要

简介

糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)被认为是糖尿病患者血糖控制的“金标准”指标,与降低糖尿病并发症风险和节省成本相关。本回顾性理赔分析评估了降低 HbA1c 对未控制的 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者医疗成本的影响。

方法

使用美国健康计划行政数据的大型存储库,这些数据与 HbA1c 值相关联,选择了至少有两次 HbA1c 值在 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日之间的糖尿病诊断患者,以确定 HbA1c 的变化以及与医疗支出相关的变化。我们使用所有医疗和药房理赔数据,从索引 HbA1c 前 1 年到索引 HbA1c 后 2 年,计算直接医疗保健费用。使用倾向评分法,根据潜在的混杂变量,将 HbA1c 降低的患者与 HbA1c 未降低的患者进行匹配。然后,使用广义线性模型回归估计两组之间成本差异的差值效应。

结果

在首次 HbA1c≥9%的 3197 名患者中,2273 名(71%)患者的 HbA1c 降低(降低者),924 名(27%)患者的 HbA1c 升高(未降低者)。匹配后,我们比较了 912 名降低者和 912 名未降低者。与 HbA1c 未降低的患者相比,前者组患者在随访的第一年和第二年的平均年度医疗保健费用分别降低了 24%和 17%。这反映了分别节省了 2503 美元和 1690 美元。对于两个时间段,门诊类别是成本节约的最大贡献者。

讨论

在我们的分析中,1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者的 HbA1c 降低与 1-2 年内医疗保健成本的增长放缓相关。这些发现表明,旨在在短时间内降低 HbA1c 的计划可能会带来大量节省,并且可能值得健康计划和其他付款人追求。

相似文献

1
Impact of Reducing Glycated Hemoglobin on Healthcare Costs Among a Population with Uncontrolled Diabetes.降低糖化血红蛋白对控制不佳的糖尿病患者医疗成本的影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Oct;16(5):675-684. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0398-2.
2
Relationship between glycemic control and diabetes-related hospital costs in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.1型或2型糖尿病患者血糖控制与糖尿病相关住院费用之间的关系。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 May;16(4):264-75. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.4.264.
3
Effect of Diabetes Treatment-Related Attributes on Costs to Type 2 Diabetes Patients in a Real-World Population.糖尿病治疗相关属性对真实世界人群 2 型糖尿病患者成本的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Apr;23(4):446-452. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.4.446.
4
Relationship of glycemic control to total diabetes-related costs for managed care health plan members with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病管理式医疗保健计划成员的血糖控制与糖尿病相关总费用的关系。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2005 Sep;11(7):559-64. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2005.11.7.559.
5
Medical claim cost impact of improved diabetes control for medicare and commercially insured patients with type 2 diabetes.改善2型糖尿病的医疗保险和商业保险患者的糖尿病控制对医疗费用的影响。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 Oct;19(8):609-20, 620a-620d. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.8.609.
6
Health Care Costs, Hospital Admissions, and Glycemic Control Using a Standalone, Real-Time, Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Commercially Insured Patients With Type 1 Diabetes.在商业保险的1型糖尿病患者中,使用独立实时连续血糖监测系统的医疗费用、住院情况及血糖控制
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jul;12(4):800-807. doi: 10.1177/1932296818777265. Epub 2018 May 8.
7
The relationship between HbA1c reduction and healthcare costs among patients with type 2 diabetes: evidence from a U.S. claims database.糖化血红蛋白降低与 2 型糖尿病患者医疗费用的关系:来自美国索赔数据库的证据。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Sep;36(9):1441-1447. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1787971. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
8
Short-term cost analysis of complications related to glycated hemoglobin in patients with type 1 diabetes in the Italian setting.意大利1型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白相关并发症的短期成本分析
Acta Diabetol. 2016 Apr;53(2):199-204. doi: 10.1007/s00592-015-0755-7. Epub 2015 May 7.
9
Impact of a Telephonic Intervention to Improve Diabetes Control on Health Care Utilization and Cost for Adults in South Bronx, New York.纽约南布朗克斯区电话干预对改善糖尿病控制对成年人的医疗利用和成本的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Apr;43(4):743-750. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0954. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
10
Effectiveness and economic impact of a diabetes education program among adults with type 2 diabetes in South Texas.德克萨斯州南部 2 型糖尿病成人糖尿病教育计划的效果和经济影响。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 9;21(1):1646. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11632-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Clinical Applications.持续血糖监测的进展:临床应用
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2025 Apr;40(2):161-173. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2025.2370. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
2
Diabetes diagnosis based on glucose control levels and time until diagnosis: a regression discontinuity approach to assess the effect on direct healthcare costs.基于血糖控制水平和诊断前时间的糖尿病诊断:一种用于评估对直接医疗成本影响的回归间断点方法。
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Mar 24;15(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00613-y.
3
Association of the glycemic background patterns and the diabetes management efficacy in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.
血糖背景模式与血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者糖尿病管理疗效的关联
World J Diabetes. 2025 Jan 15;16(1):98322. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i1.98322.
4
Health outcomes reported by healthcare providers and clients of a community-based medically tailored meal program.由基于社区的医学定制膳食计划的医疗服务提供者和客户报告的健康结果。
BMC Nutr. 2024 Nov 4;10(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s40795-024-00955-6.
5
Continuous glucose monitoring for the routine care of type 2 diabetes mellitus.实时血糖监测用于 2 型糖尿病的常规护理。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2024 Jul;20(7):426-440. doi: 10.1038/s41574-024-00973-1. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
6
Lisdexamphetamine versus methylphenidate for paediatric patients with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and type 1 diabetes (LAMAinDiab): protocol for a multicentre, randomised cross-over clinical trial in an outpatient telemedicine-supported setting.利右苯丙胺与哌醋甲酯治疗伴 1 型糖尿病的注意缺陷多动障碍儿科患者(LAMAinDiab):多中心、随机交叉临床试验方案,在门诊远程医疗支持环境下进行。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 12;13(12):e078112. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078112.
7
An Economic Evaluation of the Relationship Between Glycemic Control and Total Healthcare Costs for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study.2型糖尿病成人血糖控制与总医疗费用关系的经济评估:回顾性队列研究
Diabetes Ther. 2024 Feb;15(2):395-407. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01507-0. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
8
Group-based trajectory analysis identifies varying diabetes-related cost trajectories among type 2 diabetes patients in Texas: an empirical study using commercial insurance.基于群组的轨迹分析确定了德克萨斯州 2 型糖尿病患者不同的糖尿病相关成本轨迹:一项使用商业保险的实证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):1116. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10118-1.
9
Real-World Clinical and Economic Outcomes Among Persons With Multiple Sclerosis Initiating First- Versus Second- or Later-Line Treatment With Ocrelizumab.使用奥瑞珠单抗进行一线治疗与二线或后续治疗的多发性硬化症患者的真实世界临床和经济结果
Neurol Ther. 2023 Oct;12(5):1709-1728. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00523-3. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
10
Cost-effectiveness of : an adaptation of the diabetes prevention programme for delivery by community health workers in urban South Africa.南非城市社区卫生工作者实施糖尿病预防计划的成本效益评估。
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2212952. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2212952.