Suppr超能文献

参与团体产前护理的意向:超越是或否

Intention to Participate in Group Prenatal Care: Moving Beyond Yes or No.

作者信息

Berman Rebecca, Weber Yorga Kim, Sheeder Jeanelle

机构信息

University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jan;21(1):123-132. doi: 10.1177/1524839918784943. Epub 2018 Jun 24.

Abstract

Group prenatal care (GPNC) is an alternative model to traditional individual care and may improve public health outcomes. Prior studies suggest that interest in GPNC varies widely and few studies have examined characteristics predictive of interest in this model. The purpose of this study was to inform GPNC recruitment efforts by examining likelihood of participation delineated by characteristics and GPNC perceptions. Pregnant participants received information about GPNC then completed a survey measuring demographic, psychosocial, and reproductive characteristics, likelihood to participate in GPNC, and factors influencing selections. Respondents expressed varied levels of likelihood to participate in GPNC; 16.2% low likelihood, 44.9% moderate likelihood, and 38.9% high likelihood. Characteristics were similar between groups, and thus their use is not recommended when targeting recruitment efforts. Benefits outweighed barriers and threats for the high likelihood category, barriers and threats outweighed benefits for the low likelihood category, and benefits, barriers, and threats were balanced for the moderate likelihood category. Accurately assessing likelihood of participating in GPNC efficiently identifies individuals who are clearly either going to decline or participate, as well as promotes targeted recruitment efforts directed at those who are ambivalent. Understanding and addressing perceived benefits, barriers, and threats supports effective GPNC recruitment.

摘要

群组产前护理(GPNC)是传统个体护理的一种替代模式,可能会改善公共卫生结果。先前的研究表明,对GPNC的兴趣差异很大,很少有研究探讨预测对该模式感兴趣的特征。本研究的目的是通过考察由特征和对GPNC的认知所界定的参与可能性,为GPNC招募工作提供信息。怀孕的参与者收到了关于GPNC的信息,然后完成了一项调查,该调查测量了人口统计学、心理社会和生殖特征、参与GPNC的可能性以及影响选择的因素。受访者表示参与GPNC的可能性各不相同;16.2%可能性低,44.9%可能性中等,38.9%可能性高。各组之间的特征相似,因此在确定招募目标时不建议使用这些特征。对于高可能性类别,益处超过障碍和威胁;对于低可能性类别,障碍和威胁超过益处;对于中等可能性类别,益处、障碍和威胁处于平衡状态。准确评估参与GPNC的可能性能够有效识别明显会拒绝或参与的个体,还能促进针对犹豫不决者的定向招募工作。理解并应对感知到的益处、障碍和威胁有助于GPNC的有效招募。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验