• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与团体产前护理的意向:超越是或否

Intention to Participate in Group Prenatal Care: Moving Beyond Yes or No.

作者信息

Berman Rebecca, Weber Yorga Kim, Sheeder Jeanelle

机构信息

University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jan;21(1):123-132. doi: 10.1177/1524839918784943. Epub 2018 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1177/1524839918784943
PMID:29936899
Abstract

Group prenatal care (GPNC) is an alternative model to traditional individual care and may improve public health outcomes. Prior studies suggest that interest in GPNC varies widely and few studies have examined characteristics predictive of interest in this model. The purpose of this study was to inform GPNC recruitment efforts by examining likelihood of participation delineated by characteristics and GPNC perceptions. Pregnant participants received information about GPNC then completed a survey measuring demographic, psychosocial, and reproductive characteristics, likelihood to participate in GPNC, and factors influencing selections. Respondents expressed varied levels of likelihood to participate in GPNC; 16.2% low likelihood, 44.9% moderate likelihood, and 38.9% high likelihood. Characteristics were similar between groups, and thus their use is not recommended when targeting recruitment efforts. Benefits outweighed barriers and threats for the high likelihood category, barriers and threats outweighed benefits for the low likelihood category, and benefits, barriers, and threats were balanced for the moderate likelihood category. Accurately assessing likelihood of participating in GPNC efficiently identifies individuals who are clearly either going to decline or participate, as well as promotes targeted recruitment efforts directed at those who are ambivalent. Understanding and addressing perceived benefits, barriers, and threats supports effective GPNC recruitment.

摘要

群组产前护理(GPNC)是传统个体护理的一种替代模式,可能会改善公共卫生结果。先前的研究表明,对GPNC的兴趣差异很大,很少有研究探讨预测对该模式感兴趣的特征。本研究的目的是通过考察由特征和对GPNC的认知所界定的参与可能性,为GPNC招募工作提供信息。怀孕的参与者收到了关于GPNC的信息,然后完成了一项调查,该调查测量了人口统计学、心理社会和生殖特征、参与GPNC的可能性以及影响选择的因素。受访者表示参与GPNC的可能性各不相同;16.2%可能性低,44.9%可能性中等,38.9%可能性高。各组之间的特征相似,因此在确定招募目标时不建议使用这些特征。对于高可能性类别,益处超过障碍和威胁;对于低可能性类别,障碍和威胁超过益处;对于中等可能性类别,益处、障碍和威胁处于平衡状态。准确评估参与GPNC的可能性能够有效识别明显会拒绝或参与的个体,还能促进针对犹豫不决者的定向招募工作。理解并应对感知到的益处、障碍和威胁有助于GPNC的有效招募。

相似文献

1
Intention to Participate in Group Prenatal Care: Moving Beyond Yes or No.参与团体产前护理的意向:超越是或否
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jan;21(1):123-132. doi: 10.1177/1524839918784943. Epub 2018 Jun 24.
2
Women's experience of group prenatal care.妇女对群体产前护理的体验。
Qual Health Res. 2011 Jan;21(1):97-116. doi: 10.1177/1049732310378655. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
3
Centering and Racial Disparities (CRADLE study): rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of centeringpregnancy and birth outcomes.以患者为中心与种族差异(CRADLE研究):一项关于以患者为中心的孕期护理与分娩结局的随机对照试验的原理与设计
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Apr 13;17(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1295-7.
4
Group vs Individual Prenatal Care and Gestational Diabetes Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.群组与个体产前护理和妊娠糖尿病结局:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2330763. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30763.
5
Well Child Visit Attendance for Group Prenatal Care Participants.团体产前护理参与者的健康儿童就诊情况。
Acad Pediatr. 2023 Mar;23(2):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.09.022. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
6
The Effect of Group Prenatal Care on the Empowerment of Pregnant Adolescents: Randomised controlled trial.小组产前护理对青少年孕妇赋权的影响:随机对照试验。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2023 Nov;23(4):502-509. doi: 10.18295/squmj.6.2023.041. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
7
The impact of Centering Pregnancy Group Prenatal Care on postpartum family planning.孕期集中小组产前护理对产后计划生育的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;210(1):50.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
8
Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Group Versus Individual Prenatal Care on Psychosocial Outcomes.随机对照试验研究团体产前护理与个体产前护理对心理社会结局的影响。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2023 Nov;52(6):467-480. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2023.07.006. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
9
From concept to application: the impact of a community-wide intervention to improve the delivery of preventive services to children.从概念到应用:一项全社区干预措施对改善儿童预防性服务提供情况的影响。
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):E42. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.e42.
10
Factors predicting the initiation of prenatal care in Mexican women.墨西哥女性产前护理开始的预测因素。
Midwifery. 2009 Jun;25(3):277-85. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Group prenatal care successes, challenges, and frameworks for scaling up: a case study in adopting health care innovations.群体产前护理的成功经验、挑战及扩大规模的框架:采用医疗保健创新的案例研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Mar 4;5(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00556-1.
2
Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Group Versus Individual Prenatal Care on Psychosocial Outcomes.随机对照试验研究团体产前护理与个体产前护理对心理社会结局的影响。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2023 Nov;52(6):467-480. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2023.07.006. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
3
Anticipated benefits and challenges of implementing group care in Suriname's maternity and child care sector: a contextual analysis.
预期在苏里南母婴保健领域实施群体护理的益处和挑战:一项背景分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Aug 18;23(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05904-y.
4
It takes two to tango: the recruiter's role in accepting or refusing to participate in group antenatal care among pregnant women-an exploration through in-depth interviews.需要两个人才能跳探戈舞:在接受或拒绝参与孕妇群体产前护理方面招聘人员的角色——通过深入访谈进行的探索。
Fam Med Community Health. 2023 Jul;11(3). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002167.
5
How to Support the Referral Towards Group Antenatal Care in Belgian Primary Healthcare Organizations: A Qualitative Study.如何在比利时初级医疗保健机构中推动转诊至集体产前护理:一项定性研究。
Int J Womens Health. 2023 Jan 6;15:33-49. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S384269. eCollection 2023.
6
Group vs traditional prenatal care for improving racial equity in preterm birth and low birthweight: the Centering and Racial Disparities randomized clinical trial study.分组与传统产前护理对改善早产和低出生体重的种族公平性的比较:以中心为基础的方法和种族差异的随机临床试验研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec;227(6):893.e1-893.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.066. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
7
CenteringPregnancy in the Netherlands: Who engages, who doesn't, and why.荷兰的孕期中心服务:谁参与了,谁没有参与,以及原因。
Birth. 2022 Jun;49(2):329-340. doi: 10.1111/birt.12610. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
8
Group Prenatal Care Attendance and Women's Characteristics Associated with Low Attendance: Results from Centering and Racial Disparities (CRADLE Study).小组产前保健参与度及与低参与度相关的妇女特征:来自以妇女为中心和种族差异(CRADLE 研究)的结果。
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Oct;23(10):1371-1381. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02784-7.