• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰的孕期中心服务:谁参与了,谁没有参与,以及原因。

CenteringPregnancy in the Netherlands: Who engages, who doesn't, and why.

作者信息

Wagijo Mary-Ann R, Crone Mathilde R, van Zwicht Birgit S, van Lith Jan M M, Schindler Rising Sharon, Rijnders Marlies E B

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Birth. 2022 Jun;49(2):329-340. doi: 10.1111/birt.12610. Epub 2022 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1111/birt.12610
PMID:35092071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9306804/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

CenteringPregnancy (CP), a model of group antenatal care, was implemented in 2012 in the Netherlands to improve perinatal health; CP is associated with improved pregnancy outcomes. However, motivating women to participate in CP can be difficult. As such, we explored the characteristics associated with CP uptake and attendance and then investigated whether participation differs between health care facilities. In addition, we examined the reasons why women may decline participation and the reasons for higher or lower attendance rates.

METHODS

Data from a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial were used. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine associations among women's health behavior, sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics, health care facilities, and participation and attendance in CP.

RESULTS

A total of 2562 women were included in the study, and the average participation rate was 31.6% per health care facility (range of 10%-53%). Nulliparous women, women <26 years old or >30 years old, and women reporting average or high levels of stress were more likely to participate in CP. Participation was less likely for women who had stopped smoking before prenatal intake, or who scored below average on lifestyle/pregnancy knowledge. For those participating in CP, 87% attended seven or more out of the 10 sessions, and no significant differences were found in women's characteristics when compared for higher or lower attendance rates. After the initial uptake, group attendance rates remained high.

CONCLUSION

A more comprehensive understanding of the variation in participation rate between health care facilities is required, in order to develop effective strategies to improve the recruitment of women, especially those with less knowledge and understanding of health issues and smoking habits.

摘要

背景

“以孕妇为中心的孕期保健模式(CenteringPregnancy,CP)”于2012年在荷兰实施,旨在改善围产期健康;CP与改善妊娠结局相关。然而,促使女性参与CP可能具有挑战性。因此,我们探究了与CP参与率和出席率相关的特征,随后调查了不同医疗机构之间的参与情况是否存在差异。此外,我们还研究了女性拒绝参与的原因以及出席率较高或较低的原因。

方法

使用了一项阶梯式楔形整群随机对照试验的数据。单因素和多因素逻辑回归模型用于确定女性的健康行为、社会人口学和心理社会特征、医疗机构与CP参与率和出席率之间的关联。

结果

共有2562名女性纳入研究,每个医疗机构的平均参与率为31.6%(范围为10% - 53%)。未生育的女性、年龄小于26岁或大于30岁的女性以及报告压力水平为中等或较高的女性更有可能参与CP。在产前检查前戒烟的女性或生活方式/妊娠知识得分低于平均水平的女性参与CP的可能性较小。对于参与CP的女性,87%在10次课程中出席了7次或更多次,在比较出席率较高或较低的女性特征时未发现显著差异。在最初的参与之后,小组出席率仍然很高。

结论

需要更全面地了解不同医疗机构之间参与率的差异,以便制定有效的策略来提高女性的招募率,尤其是那些对健康问题和吸烟习惯了解较少的女性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ef/9306804/af37b0505c09/BIRT-49-329-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ef/9306804/af37b0505c09/BIRT-49-329-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37ef/9306804/af37b0505c09/BIRT-49-329-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
CenteringPregnancy in the Netherlands: Who engages, who doesn't, and why.荷兰的孕期中心服务:谁参与了,谁没有参与,以及原因。
Birth. 2022 Jun;49(2):329-340. doi: 10.1111/birt.12610. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
2
The Effect of CenteringPregnancy Group Antenatal Care on Maternal, Birth, and Neonatal Outcomes Among Low-Risk Women in the Netherlands: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.荷兰低危孕妇中孕期集中护理对母婴和新生儿结局的影响:一项 stepped-wedge 集群随机试验。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2024 Mar-Apr;69(2):191-201. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13582. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
3
Group based prenatal care in a low-and high risk population in the Netherlands: a study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.荷兰低风险和高风险人群的基于群组的产前护理:一项阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 15;16(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1152-0.
4
Women-centered care: Implementation of CenteringPregnancy® in The Netherlands.以妇女为中心的护理:荷兰 CenteringPregnancy® 的实施。
Birth. 2019 Sep;46(3):450-460. doi: 10.1111/birt.12413. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
5
Contributions of CenteringPregnancy to women's health behaviours, health literacy, and health care use in the Netherlands.“以孕妇为中心”项目对荷兰女性健康行为、健康素养及医疗保健利用情况的贡献。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 May 24;35:102244. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102244. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Vulnerable Women's Perceptions of Individual Versus Group Prenatal Care: Results of a Cross-Sectional Survey.弱势女性对个体与群体产前护理的认知:一项横断面调查结果
Matern Child Health J. 2018 Nov;22(11):1632-1638. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2559-1.
7
The effects of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on postpartum visit attendance and contraception use.孕期集中护理组对产后就诊率和避孕措施使用情况的影响。
Contraception. 2020 Jul;102(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.010. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
8
Health system and community level interventions for improving antenatal care coverage and health outcomes.改善产前保健覆盖率和健康结局的卫生系统及社区层面干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 1;2015(12):CD010994. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010994.pub2.
9
The Role of Trust in CenteringPregnancy: Building Interpersonal Trust Relationships in Group-Based Prenatal Care in The Netherlands.信任在“以孕妇为中心”模式中的作用:在荷兰基于小组的产前护理中建立人际信任关系
Birth. 2017 Mar;44(1):41-47. doi: 10.1111/birt.12260. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
10
Implementing CenteringPregnancy Group Prenatal Care for Minority Women Living with HIV at an Urban University Hospital.为城市大学医院的 HIV 阳性少数民族妇女实施集中孕期小组产前护理。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019 Jul;64(4):451-461. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12987. Epub 2019 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing group care in Dutch and Surinamese maternity and child care services: the vital importance of addressing outer context barriers.在荷兰和苏里南的母婴保健服务中实施群体护理:解决外部环境障碍至关重要。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Aug 12;24(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06720-8.
2
Effects of Two Group Prenatal Care Interventions on Mental Health: An RCT.两种团体产前保健干预措施对心理健康的影响:一项 RCT 研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2024 May;66(5):797-808. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.01.005. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
3
It takes two to tango: the recruiter's role in accepting or refusing to participate in group antenatal care among pregnant women-an exploration through in-depth interviews.

本文引用的文献

1
Core strategies, social processes, and contextual influences of early phases of implementation and statewide scale-up of group prenatal care in South Carolina.南卡罗来纳州实施和全州推广小组产前护理早期阶段的核心策略、社会过程及背景影响。
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Apr;79:101760. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101760. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
2
Group Prenatal Care Attendance and Women's Characteristics Associated with Low Attendance: Results from Centering and Racial Disparities (CRADLE Study).小组产前保健参与度及与低参与度相关的妇女特征:来自以妇女为中心和种族差异(CRADLE 研究)的结果。
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Oct;23(10):1371-1381. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02784-7.
3
需要两个人才能跳探戈舞:在接受或拒绝参与孕妇群体产前护理方面招聘人员的角色——通过深入访谈进行的探索。
Fam Med Community Health. 2023 Jul;11(3). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002167.
4
Contributions of CenteringPregnancy to women's health behaviours, health literacy, and health care use in the Netherlands.“以孕妇为中心”项目对荷兰女性健康行为、健康素养及医疗保健利用情况的贡献。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 May 24;35:102244. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102244. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
How to Support the Referral Towards Group Antenatal Care in Belgian Primary Healthcare Organizations: A Qualitative Study.如何在比利时初级医疗保健机构中推动转诊至集体产前护理:一项定性研究。
Int J Womens Health. 2023 Jan 6;15:33-49. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S384269. eCollection 2023.
Women-centered care: Implementation of CenteringPregnancy® in The Netherlands.
以妇女为中心的护理:荷兰 CenteringPregnancy® 的实施。
Birth. 2019 Sep;46(3):450-460. doi: 10.1111/birt.12413. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
4
Intention to Participate in Group Prenatal Care: Moving Beyond Yes or No.参与团体产前护理的意向:超越是或否
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jan;21(1):123-132. doi: 10.1177/1524839918784943. Epub 2018 Jun 24.
5
A systematic overview of the literature regarding group prenatal care for high-risk pregnant women.高危孕妇群体产前护理相关文献的系统综述
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 29;17(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1522-2.
6
Group versus traditional prenatal care in low-risk women delivering at term: a retrospective cohort study.足月分娩的低风险女性中群组式护理与传统产前护理的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Perinatol. 2017 Jul;37(7):769-771. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.33. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
7
Group based prenatal care in a low-and high risk population in the Netherlands: a study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.荷兰低风险和高风险人群的基于群组的产前护理:一项阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 15;16(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1152-0.
8
Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.群组产前护理与传统产前护理的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):551-61. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001560.
9
Group Prenatal Care Attendance: Determinants and Relationship with Care Satisfaction.孕期保健就诊分组:决定因素及其与保健满意度的关系。
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Apr;21(4):770-776. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2161-3.
10
The Global strategy for women's, children's and adolescents' health (2016-2030): a roadmap based on evidence and country experience.《2016-2030年妇女、儿童和青少年健康全球战略:基于证据和国家经验的路线图》
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 May 1;94(5):398-400. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.170431. Epub 2016 May 2.