• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助手术与结直肠癌患者切除质量之间的关联。

Association between robot-assisted surgery and resection quality in patients with colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Fransgaard Tina, Pinar Ismail, Thygesen Lau Caspar, Gögenur Ismail

机构信息

Zealand University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600 Køge, Denmark.

Zealand University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600 Køge, Denmark.

出版信息

Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;27(2):177-184. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2018.03.003
PMID:29937169
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Resection quality after robot-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer have not previously been investigated in a nationwide study. The aim of the study was to examine the resection quality in robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Furthermore, 30-day mortality, postoperative complications, and conversion to open surgery were investigated.

METHODS

Patients undergoing either laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015 were included. The primary outcome was whether R0 resection was achieved. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality, postoperative complications, and conversions to laparotomy.

RESULTS

A total of 8615 and 3934 patients had a diagnosis of colon cancer and rectal cancer respectively. Of the patients with colon cancer, 511 patients underwent robot-assisted surgery and of the patients with rectal cancer, 706 patients underwent robot-assisted surgery. In the multivariate analysis, patients with colon cancer had an odds ratio (OR) = 0.63 (95%CI 0.45-0.88) for receiving R0 resection in the robot-assisted group compared to laparoscopy. For patients with rectal cancer, the OR was 1.20 (95%CI 0.89-1.61). No difference in 30-day mortality or postoperative complications were observed. The OR of conversion to laparotomy was lower in the robot-assisted group compared to the laparoscopic group in both patients with colon - and rectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed significant lower odds of receiving R0 resection in patients with colon cancer undergoing robot-assisted surgery. In patients with rectal cancer the robot-assisted surgery non-significantly increased the odds of receiving R0 resection.

摘要

背景

此前尚未在全国性研究中对机器人辅助结直肠癌手术的切除质量进行调查。本研究的目的是检查机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的切除质量。此外,还对30天死亡率、术后并发症及中转开腹手术情况进行了调查。

方法

纳入2010年1月1日至2015年12月31日期间接受腹腔镜或机器人辅助结直肠癌手术的患者。主要结局是是否实现R0切除。次要结局是30天死亡率、术后并发症及中转开腹手术情况。

结果

分别有8615例和3934例患者被诊断为结肠癌和直肠癌。在结肠癌患者中,511例接受了机器人辅助手术;在直肠癌患者中,706例接受了机器人辅助手术。多因素分析显示,与腹腔镜手术相比,机器人辅助组结肠癌患者接受R0切除的比值比(OR)为0.63(95%CI 0.45 - 0.88)。直肠癌患者的OR为1.20(95%CI 0.89 - 1.61)。未观察到30天死亡率或术后并发症存在差异。在结肠癌和直肠癌患者中,机器人辅助组中转开腹手术的OR均低于腹腔镜组。

结论

该研究表明,接受机器人辅助手术的结肠癌患者获得R0切除的几率显著降低。在直肠癌患者中,机器人辅助手术获得R0切除的几率虽有增加,但无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Association between robot-assisted surgery and resection quality in patients with colorectal cancer.机器人辅助手术与结直肠癌患者切除质量之间的关联。
Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;27(2):177-184. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
2
Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of clinical T4b tumours of distal sigmoid and rectum: initial results.机器人辅助腹腔镜下乙状结肠和直肠 T4b 期肿瘤的切除:初步结果。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4571-4578. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6210-4. Epub 2018 May 16.
3
Perioperative pain after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection.机器人辅助与腹腔镜直肠切除术后的围手术期疼痛
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Mar;33(3):285-289. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2943-0. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
4
Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer.机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的短期疗效比较
Surg Innov. 2019 Feb;26(1):57-65. doi: 10.1177/1553350618797822. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
5
Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: Short-term outcomes at a single center.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌:单中心短期结果。
Indian J Cancer. 2021 Apr-Jun;58(2):225-231. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_86_19.
6
[Results of video-assisted technologies in colorectal surgery].[结直肠手术中视频辅助技术的结果]
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2018(2):66-73. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia2018266-73.
7
Security and Radical Assessment in Open, Laparoscopic, Robotic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Comparative Study.开放、腹腔镜及机器人辅助结直肠癌手术中的安全性与根治性评估:一项对比研究
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan 1;17:1533033818794160. doi: 10.1177/1533033818794160.
8
Long-Term Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.机器人辅助手术治疗结直肠癌患者的长期疗效。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec;25(13):3906-3912. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6862-2. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
9
Comparison of complication and conversion rates between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer: which patients and providers could benefit most from robotic-assisted surgery?机器人辅助与腹腔镜直肠癌切除术的并发症及中转率比较:哪些患者和医疗服务提供者能从机器人辅助手术中获益最多?
J Med Econ. 2018 Mar;21(3):254-261. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1396994. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
10
Improved perioperative outcomes and reduced inflammatory stress response in malignant robot-assisted colorectal resections: a retrospective cohort study of 298 patients.恶性机器人辅助结直肠切除术的围手术期结局改善和炎症应激反应减轻:298 例患者的回顾性队列研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 May 22;19(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02263-w.

引用本文的文献

1
A Narrative Review on the Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Colorectal Cancer Management.关于人工智能(AI)在结直肠癌管理中作用的叙述性综述
Cureus. 2025 Feb 24;17(2):e79570. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79570. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for patients ≥ 65 years of age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.≥65岁患者机器人辅助与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术短期结局的比较:前瞻性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 Feb 4;19(1):60. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02222-7.
3
Comparison of robotic right colectomy and laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
机器人右半结肠切除术与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Jul;27(7):521-535. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02821-2. Epub 2023 May 15.
4
Comparison of clinical efficacy and postoperative inflammatory response between laparoscopic and open radical resection of colorectal cancer.腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌根治术临床疗效及术后炎症反应的比较
World J Clin Cases. 2022 May 6;10(13):4042-4049. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4042.
5
Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Breast Surgery: Recent Evidence with Comparative Clinical Outcomes.机器人辅助微创乳腺手术:具有比较临床结果的最新证据
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 25;11(7):1827. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071827.
6
Short-term outcomes in robot-assisted compared to laparoscopic colon cancer resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的短期结果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):32-46. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08782-7. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
7
Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer: a nationwide cohort study.机器人与腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术治疗结肠癌:一项全国性队列研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;36(10):2147-2158. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03966-y. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
8
Improved perioperative outcomes and reduced inflammatory stress response in malignant robot-assisted colorectal resections: a retrospective cohort study of 298 patients.恶性机器人辅助结直肠切除术的围手术期结局改善和炎症应激反应减轻:298 例患者的回顾性队列研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 May 22;19(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02263-w.
9
The art of robotic colonic resection: a review of progress in the past 5 years.机器人结肠切除术的艺术:过去 5 年进展综述。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):1037-1048. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00969-2. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
10
Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: Current Evidences and Future Perspectives.机器人全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:当前证据与未来展望
Ann Coloproctol. 2020 Oct;36(5):293-303. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.06.16. Epub 2020 Oct 31.