• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

城市服务不足社区肺癌患者的筛查模式和死亡率差异。

Screening Patterns and Mortality Differences in Patients With Lung Cancer at an Urban Underserved Community.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.

出版信息

Clin Lung Cancer. 2018 Sep;19(5):e767-e773. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2018.05.019
PMID:29937386
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The landmark National Lung Screening Trial demonstrated significant reduction in lung cancer-related mortality. However, European lung cancer screening (LCS) trials have not confirmed such benefit. We examined LCS patterns and determined the impact of LCS-led diagnosis on the mortality of newly diagnosed patients with lung cancer in an underserved community.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of patients diagnosed with primary lung cancer in 2013 through 2016 (n = 855) were reviewed for primary care provider (PCP) status and LCS eligibility and completion, determined using United States Preventative Services Task Force guidelines. Univariate analyses of patient characteristics were conducted between LCS-eligible patients based on screening completion. Survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression.

RESULTS

In 2013 through 2016, 175 patients with primary lung cancer had an established PCP and were eligible for LCS. Among them, 19% (33/175) completed screening prior to diagnosis. LCS completion was associated with younger age (P = .02), active smoking status (P < .01), earlier stage at time of diagnosis (P < .01), follow-up in-network cancer treatment (P = .03), and surgical management (P < .01). LCS-eligible patients who underwent screening had improved all-cause mortality compared with those not screened (P < .01). Multivariate regression showed surgery (hazard ratio, 0.31; P = .04) significantly affected mortality.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess LCS patterns and mortality differences on patients with screen-detected lung cancer in an urban underserved setting since the inception of United States Preventative Services Task Force guidelines. Patients with a LCS-led diagnosis had improved mortality, likely owing to cancer detection at earlier stages with curative treatment, which echoes the finding of prospective trials.

摘要

背景

具有里程碑意义的全国肺癌筛查试验表明,肺癌相关死亡率显著降低。然而,欧洲的肺癌筛查(LCS)试验并未证实这一益处。我们检查了 LCS 模式,并确定了在服务不足的社区中,LCS 引导诊断对新诊断的肺癌患者死亡率的影响。

患者和方法

回顾了 2013 年至 2016 年期间诊断为原发性肺癌的患者的医疗记录(n=855),以确定初级保健提供者(PCP)的状况和使用美国预防服务工作组指南确定的 LCS 资格和完成情况。根据筛查完成情况,对 LCS 合格患者的患者特征进行了单变量分析。使用 Kaplan-Meier 和多变量 Cox 回归进行生存分析。

结果

2013 年至 2016 年,有 175 名原发性肺癌患者有固定的 PCP 并符合 LCS 条件。其中,19%(33/175)在诊断前完成了筛查。LCS 完成情况与年龄较小(P=0.02)、当前吸烟状态(P<0.01)、诊断时较早的分期(P<0.01)、网络内癌症治疗的随访(P=0.03)和手术治疗(P<0.01)相关。接受筛查的 LCS 合格患者的全因死亡率低于未接受筛查的患者(P<0.01)。多变量回归显示手术(风险比,0.31;P=0.04)显著影响死亡率。

结论

据我们所知,这是自美国预防服务工作组指南发布以来,在城市服务不足的环境中评估 LCS 模式和筛查发现的肺癌患者死亡率差异的第一项研究。接受 LCS 引导诊断的患者死亡率有所改善,这可能是由于更早阶段进行癌症检测并进行了治愈性治疗,这与前瞻性试验的结果一致。

相似文献

1
Screening Patterns and Mortality Differences in Patients With Lung Cancer at an Urban Underserved Community.城市服务不足社区肺癌患者的筛查模式和死亡率差异。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2018 Sep;19(5):e767-e773. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
2
Impact of Primary Care Access on Mortality of Lung Cancer Patients in an Underserved Community.基层医疗可及性对服务不足社区肺癌患者死亡率的影响。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar;42(3):298-303. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000516.
3
Delay between the initial symptoms, the diagnosis and the onset of specific treatment in elderly patients with lung cancer.老年肺癌患者从出现初始症状到确诊及开始特定治疗之间的时间延误。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2012 Sep;13(5):363-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2011.11.010. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
4
Racial Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening: An Exploratory Investigation.肺癌筛查中的种族差异:一项探索性研究。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2018 Oct;110(5):424-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
5
Addressing Sex Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility: USPSTF vs PLCOm2012 Criteria.解决肺癌筛查资格方面的性别差异:美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)与PLCOm2012标准对比
Chest. 2022 Jan;161(1):248-256. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.066. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
6
Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality with Extended Follow-up in the National Lung Screening Trial.国家肺癌筛查试验中延长随访后的肺癌发病率和死亡率。
J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Oct;14(10):1732-1742. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.05.044. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
7
What factors do patients consider most important in making lung cancer screening decisions? Findings from a demonstration project conducted in the Veterans Health Administration.患者在做出肺癌筛查决策时最看重哪些因素?退伍军人健康管理局开展的一项示范项目的调查结果。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Feb;104:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
8
Perceptions and Utilization of Lung Cancer Screening Among Primary Care Physicians.基层医疗医生对肺癌筛查的认知与应用
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Nov;11(11):1856-1862. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
9
Prolonged lung cancer screening reduced 10-year mortality in the MILD trial: new confirmation of lung cancer screening efficacy.MILD 试验证实:延长肺癌筛查时间可降低 10 年死亡率,再次确认肺癌筛查的有效性。
Ann Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;30(7):1162-1169. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz117.
10
Risk Factors for Lung Cancer Mortality in a Referral Center.一家转诊中心肺癌死亡的风险因素
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(6):2877-81.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of low dose computed tomography (LDCT) on lung cancer screening on incidence and mortality in regions with high tuberculosis prevalence: A systematic review.低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)对高结核流行地区肺癌筛查的发病率和死亡率的影响:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 11;19(9):e0308106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308106. eCollection 2024.
2
HIV Associated Lung Cancer: Unique Clinicopathologic Features and Immune Biomarkers Impacting Lung Cancer Screening and Management.HIV 相关肺癌:影响肺癌筛查和管理的独特临床病理特征和免疫生物标志物。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2024 Mar;25(2):159-167. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2023.12.002. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
3
Is underutilization of adjuvant therapy in resected non-small-cell lung cancer associated with socioeconomic disparities?
辅助治疗在切除的非小细胞肺癌中的未充分利用是否与社会经济差异有关?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Dec 1;64(6). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad383.
4
A Lung Cancer Screening Education Program Impacts both Referral Rates and Provider and Medical Assistant Knowledge at Two Federally Qualified Health Centers.一项肺癌筛查教育计划在两家联邦合格健康中心影响转诊率和提供者及医疗助理的知识水平。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2022 Jun;23(4):356-363. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 12.
5
The impact of income and education on lung cancer screening utilization, eligibility, and outcomes: a narrative review of socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening.收入和教育对肺癌筛查利用、资格及结果的影响:肺癌筛查中社会经济差异的叙述性综述
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Jun;13(6):3745-3757. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3281.
6
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening in the United States: A systematic review.美国肺癌筛查中的种族和社会经济差异:系统评价。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jul;71(4):299-314. doi: 10.3322/caac.21671. Epub 2021 May 20.
7
Perceptions of and Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening Among Physicians in Puerto Rico: A Qualitative Study.波多黎各医生对肺癌筛查的看法和障碍:一项定性研究。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2020;31(2):973-991. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2020.0072.
8
Survival Disparities in Black Patients With EGFR-mutated Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.EGFR 突变型非小细胞肺癌黑人患者的生存差异。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2020 Mar;21(2):177-185. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 17.