Powell B J, Penick E C, Read M R, Ludwig A M
J Stud Alcohol. 1985 Jul;46(4):309-12. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1985.46.309.
Men inpatient alcoholics (N = 174) from a Veterans Administration medical center who were preselected by employment status were randomly assigned to one of three outpatient treatment interventions: (1) medication only, (2) active support or (3) untreated medical monitoring. Subjects were followed monthly for 1 year, with an 85% 12-month follow-up rate. Although the sample as a whole showed reduced alcohol misuse and improved social functioning after 12 months, the specific form of treatment was unrelated to outcome. These findings suggest that the intensity of the outpatient treatment experience is not related to outcome and that time-consuming interventions are not differentially cost-effective.
来自一家退伍军人管理局医疗中心的男性住院酗酒者(N = 174),根据就业状况预先筛选后,被随机分配到三种门诊治疗干预措施之一:(1)仅药物治疗,(2)积极支持或(3)未经治疗的医学监测。对受试者进行为期1年的每月随访,12个月的随访率为85%。尽管总体样本在12个月后显示出酒精滥用减少和社会功能改善,但具体的治疗形式与结果无关。这些发现表明,门诊治疗体验的强度与结果无关,耗时的干预措施在成本效益方面没有差异。