• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

北爱尔兰信息图表试验(TINI):一项将信息图表与文本进行比较的随机对照试验的初步评估与结果

Trial of infographics in Northern Ireland (TINI): Preliminary evaluation and results of a randomized controlled trial comparing infographics with text.

作者信息

McCrorie Alan David, Chen Jingwen Jessica, Weller Ross, McGlade Kieran John, Donnelly Conan

机构信息

School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cogent Med. 2018 Jun 1;5(1):1483591. doi: 10.1080/2331205X.2018.1483591.

DOI:10.1080/2331205X.2018.1483591
PMID:29938211
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6002148/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Infographics represent a potential means of improving public knowledge about cancer. However, there is little experimental evidence of their efficacy. This preliminary study investigates whether infographics are superior to text for the communication of information about cancer risk in old age via a three armed randomized controlled trial. Trial involved allocation concealment and block randomization of 30 male participants aged over 50 to receive text information (control) or one of two infographics (interventions). Participants who viewed an infographic were more likely to know the correct association between cancer risk and old age compared with those viewing text information (risk ratio = 3.0, 95% confidence interval 0.82-10.90). Participants had limited understanding of the phrases "cancer incidence" and "cancer prevalence" but good understanding of the phrases "cancer risk factor" and "cancer stage." Possession of good numerical skills appears to be a key determinant of ability to extract meaning from statistical information provided; regardless of format. Initial results suggest icon array infographics may be more effective communication mediums than text but further study with more participants and an updated infographic is necessary to confirm this finding.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN33951209.

摘要

未标注

信息图表是提高公众癌症知识的一种潜在手段。然而,几乎没有实验证据证明其有效性。这项初步研究通过一项三臂随机对照试验,调查在传达老年癌症风险信息方面,信息图表是否优于文字。试验涉及对30名年龄超过50岁的男性参与者进行分配隐藏和区组随机化,以使其接收文字信息(对照组)或两种信息图表之一(干预组)。与查看文字信息的参与者相比,查看信息图表的参与者更有可能知晓癌症风险与老年之间的正确关联(风险比 = 3.0,95%置信区间0.82 - 10.90)。参与者对“癌症发病率”和“癌症患病率”这两个短语的理解有限,但对“癌症风险因素”和“癌症分期”这两个短语理解良好。具备良好的数字技能似乎是从所提供的统计信息中提取意义能力的关键决定因素;无论信息形式如何。初步结果表明,图标阵列信息图表可能是比文字更有效的沟通媒介,但需要更多参与者和更新后的信息图表进行进一步研究以证实这一发现。

试验注册号

ISRCTN33951209。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156b/6002148/233c0e1080ad/OAMD_A_1483591_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156b/6002148/3f9b217e6a8a/OAMD_A_1483591_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156b/6002148/a27f068d9b3a/OAMD_A_1483591_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156b/6002148/233c0e1080ad/OAMD_A_1483591_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156b/6002148/3f9b217e6a8a/OAMD_A_1483591_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156b/6002148/a27f068d9b3a/OAMD_A_1483591_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/156b/6002148/233c0e1080ad/OAMD_A_1483591_F0003_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Trial of infographics in Northern Ireland (TINI): Preliminary evaluation and results of a randomized controlled trial comparing infographics with text.北爱尔兰信息图表试验(TINI):一项将信息图表与文本进行比较的随机对照试验的初步评估与结果
Cogent Med. 2018 Jun 1;5(1):1483591. doi: 10.1080/2331205X.2018.1483591.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey.人们如何使用和看待总结健康和医学研究的信息图?一项横断面调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Sep 14;22(1):677. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03744-6.
4
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
5
The impact of age-relevant and generic infographics on knowledge, attitudes and intention to attend cervical screening: A randomized controlled trial.年龄相关和通用信息图对知识、态度和参加宫颈癌筛查意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Br J Health Psychol. 2024 Feb;29(1):204-220. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12695. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
6
The effect of an infographic promotion on research dissemination and readership: A randomized controlled trial.信息图推广对研究传播和读者群的影响:一项随机对照试验。
CJEM. 2018 Nov;20(6):826-833. doi: 10.1017/cem.2018.436. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
7
Effect of online infographics for enhancing health literacy among patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized controlled trial.在线图表对 2 型糖尿病患者在 COVID-19 大流行期间在基层医疗单位提高健康素养的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Mar 15;25(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02335-2.
8
Trends in and Effectiveness of Infographics for Health Communication: A Scoping Review.健康传播中信息图表的趋势与效果:一项范围综述
Health Commun. 2025 Feb;40(2):222-232. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2342595. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
9
Infographic summaries for clinical practice guidelines: results from user testing of the BMJ Rapid Recommendations in primary care.临床实践指南的信息图摘要:初级保健中对 BMJ 快速推荐进行用户测试的结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 9;13(11):e071847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071847.
10
Text analysis of billboards and infographic graphics advertising COVID-19 on promoting preventive behaviors and taking vaccination against the coronavirus pandemic and investigating the opinions of the Iranian adult population.广告牌和信息图表图形分析广告 COVID-19 以促进预防行为和接种冠状病毒大流行疫苗,并调查伊朗成年人口的意见。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 1;24(1):651. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18135-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Public awareness and attitudes toward biobank and sample donation: A regional Chinese survey.公众对生物库和样本捐赠的认识和态度:一项中国区域性调查。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 23;10:1025775. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1025775. eCollection 2022.
2
Outcome reporting bias in nephrology randomized clinical trials: Examining outcomes represented by graphical illustrations.肾脏病学随机临床试验中的结果报告偏倚:审视以图形说明呈现的结果
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 May 25;28:100924. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100924. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Behavioural Activation for Social IsoLation (BASIL+) trial (Behavioural activation to mitigate depression and loneliness among older people with long-term conditions): Protocol for a fully-powered pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital storytelling as a method in health research: a systematic review protocol.数字故事作为健康研究中的一种方法:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 5;7(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0704-y.
2
Public awareness of the link between alcohol and cancer in England in 2015: a population-based survey.2015年英国公众对酒精与癌症之间联系的认知:一项基于人群的调查。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 30;16(1):1194. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3855-6.
3
Infographics: Healthcare Communication for the Digital Age.信息图表:数字时代的医疗沟通
社交隔离行为激活(BASIL+)试验(行为激活以减轻患有长期疾病的老年人的抑郁和孤独感):一项充分效能的实用随机对照试验方案
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0263856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263856. eCollection 2022.
4
Negative pressure wound therapy versus usual care for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention (SWHSI-2 trial): study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, cross surgical specialty, randomised controlled trial.负压伤口治疗与常规护理用于二期愈合手术伤口(SWHSI-2 试验):一项实用的、多中心、跨外科专业、随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Oct 25;22(1):739. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05662-2.
5
Using evidence-based infographics to increase parents' understanding about antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance: a proof-of-concept study.使用基于证据的信息图表提高家长对抗生素使用和抗生素耐药性的认识:一项概念验证研究。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Dec 4;2(4):dlaa102. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaa102. eCollection 2020 Dec.
6
How to make your research jump off the page: Co-creation to broaden public engagement in medical research.如何让你的研究脱颖而出:共同创作拓宽医学研究的公众参与度。
PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 14;17(9):e1003246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003246. eCollection 2020 Sep.
Ulster Med J. 2016 May;85(2):71-5.
4
Automated pictographic illustration of discharge instructions with Glyph: impact on patient recall and satisfaction.使用Glyph对出院指导进行自动象形图说明:对患者记忆和满意度的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Nov;23(6):1136-1142. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw019. Epub 2016 May 27.
5
The influence of gender and other patient characteristics on health care-seeking behaviour: a QUALICOPC study.性别及其他患者特征对寻求医疗行为的影响:一项QUALICOPC研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 31;17:38. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0440-0.
6
Language, terminology and the readability of online cancer information.在线癌症信息的语言、术语及可读性。
Med Humanit. 2016 Mar;42(1):36-41. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2015-010766. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
7
Sometimes more is more: iterative participatory design of infographics for engagement of community members with varying levels of health literacy.有时多即是多:为使不同健康素养水平的社区成员参与进来而进行的信息图迭代式参与式设计。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):174-83. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv079. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
8
A simple formula for the calculation of sample size in pilot studies.一种用于计算预试验样本量的简单公式。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov;68(11):1375-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
9
Gender Differences in Searching for Health Information on the Internet and the Virtual Patient-Physician Relationship in Germany: Exploratory Results on How Men and Women Differ and Why.德国互联网健康信息搜索中的性别差异及虚拟医患关系:关于男性与女性差异及原因的探索性结果
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 22;17(6):e156. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4127.
10
Measurement of reading speed with standardized texts: a comparison of single sentences and paragraphs.使用标准化文本测量阅读速度:单句与段落的比较
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;253(8):1369-75. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3065-4. Epub 2015 Jun 12.