• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影像学检查和活检在大型无蒂直肠息肉的诊治和分期中的作用。

The role of imaging and biopsy in the management and staging of large non-pedunculated rectal polyps.

机构信息

a Department of Colorectal Surgery , Queen Alexandra Hospital , Portsmouth , UK.

b Department of Surgery and Endoscopy , Care UK North East London Treatment Centre, King Georges Hospital , Ilford , UK.

出版信息

Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Aug;12(8):749-755. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2018.1492377. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1080/17474124.2018.1492377
PMID:29940808
Abstract

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are often used for benign and Sm1 large non-pedunculated rectal polyps (LNPRPs), although other surgical techniques including transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) and transanal minimal invasive surgery remain available. This review covers the role of pre-excisional imaging and selective biopsy of LNPRPs. Areas covered: Polyps between 2 and 3 cm with favorable features (Paris 1, Kudo III/IV pit patterns, and non-lateral spreading type [LST]) may have a one-stage EMR without biopsy and imaging, provided adequate expertise is available with other technologies such as magnifying chromoendoscopy. Higher-risk polyps (moderate/severe dysplasia, 0-IIa+c morphology, nongranular LST, Kudo pit pattern V or submucosal carcinoma, or those >3 cm) should have pre-EMR/ESD imaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) ± biopsies and photographs prior to multidisciplinary team discussion. Expert commentary: In some centers, EMR and ESD are considered the primary modality of treatment, with TEMS as a back-up, while elsewhere, TEMS is the main modality for excision of significant polyps and early colorectal cancer lesions. Likewise, the exact roles of ERUS and MRI will depend on availability of local expertise, although it is suggested that the techniques are complementary.

摘要

内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)和内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)常用于治疗良性和 Sm1 期非息肉状大型直肠息肉(LNPRP),尽管其他手术技术,包括经肛门内镜微创手术(TEMS)和经肛门微创外科,仍然可用。这篇综述涵盖了 LNPRP 术前影像学检查和选择性活检的作用。涵盖的领域:具有有利特征(巴黎 1 型、Kudo III/IV 点样图案和非侧向扩展型[LST])的 2-3cm 大小息肉,可以在没有活检和影像学检查的情况下进行一期 EMR,前提是有足够的专业知识,同时还可以使用其他技术,如放大染色内镜。高危息肉(中度/重度异型增生、0-IIa+c 形态、非颗粒状 LST、Kudo 点样图案 V 或黏膜下癌,或直径>3cm)应在多学科团队讨论前进行 EMR/ESD 术前影像学检查,包括磁共振成像(MRI)和/或直肠腔内超声(ERUS)±活检和照片。专家评论:在一些中心,EMR 和 ESD 被认为是主要的治疗方式,TEMS 作为后备手段,而在其他地方,TEMS 是切除大息肉和早期结直肠癌病变的主要方式。同样,ERUS 和 MRI 的具体作用将取决于当地专家的专业知识,尽管有人建议这些技术是互补的。

相似文献

1
The role of imaging and biopsy in the management and staging of large non-pedunculated rectal polyps.影像学检查和活检在大型无蒂直肠息肉的诊治和分期中的作用。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Aug;12(8):749-755. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2018.1492377. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
2
A Rectum-Specific Selective Resection Algorithm Optimizes Oncologic Outcomes for Large Nonpedunculated Rectal Polyps.一种针对直肠的选择性切除算法可优化大型无蒂直肠息肉的肿瘤学治疗效果。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jan;21(1):72-80.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.04.021. Epub 2022 May 6.
3
The role of endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the management of early rectal lesions in a tertiary center.直肠内超声和磁共振成像在三级中心早期直肠病变管理中的作用。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2014 Dec;13(4):245-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
4
Endorectal ultrasound in the management of patients with malignant rectal polyps.直肠内超声在恶性直肠息肉患者管理中的应用
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 May;48(5):910-6; discussion 916-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0903-6.
5
Surgery Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Polyps: Making Sense of When to Use Which Approach.大型息肉的手术治疗与内镜下黏膜切除术及内镜下黏膜下剥离术:明确何时采用何种方法
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2019 Oct;29(4):675-685. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
6
Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial.经肛门微创外科手术(TAMIS)与内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗非息肉样直肠病变(TRIASSIC 研究):一项欧洲多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul 13;20(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01367-z.
7
Rectal Cancer Microsurgery直肠癌显微手术
8
[Standardized development of transanal endoscopic microsurgery].经肛门内镜显微手术的标准化发展
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Aug 25;20(8):852-856.
9
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Technical advantages compared to endoscopic mucosal resection and minimally invasive surgery.结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术:与内镜黏膜切除术和微创手术相比的技术优势。
Dig Endosc. 2014 Jan;26 Suppl 1:52-61. doi: 10.1111/den.12196. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
10
Quality of Local Excision for Rectal Neoplasms Using Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Versus Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Multi-institutional Matched Analysis.经肛门内镜显微手术与经肛门微创手术治疗直肠肿瘤的局部切除质量:多机构匹配分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Sep;60(9):928-935. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000884.

引用本文的文献

1
Histopathological features for coexistent invasive cancer in large colorectal adenomatous polyps.大结直肠腺瘤中并存浸润性癌的组织病理学特征。
BJS Open. 2021 May 7;5(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa053.
2
Oncological outcome after local treatment for early stage rectal cancer.早期直肠癌局部治疗的肿瘤学结果。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):489-497. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08308-1. Epub 2021 Feb 5.