• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大型息肉的手术治疗与内镜下黏膜切除术及内镜下黏膜下剥离术:明确何时采用何种方法

Surgery Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Polyps: Making Sense of When to Use Which Approach.

作者信息

Fukami Norio

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2019 Oct;29(4):675-685. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.giec.2019.06.007
PMID:31445690
Abstract

Endoscopic resection for large colorectal lesion is effective and cost-saving than surgery. Piecemeal resections are often effective if applied meticulously but endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows meritorious removal of large lesions in one piece. For rectal lesions, transanal endoscopic microsurgery or transanal minimally invasive surgery offers more radical transmural resection but ESD is also effective for removal of complex rectal lesions. Surgical resection with lymph node dissection is the gold standard for invasive cancer; however, the management of low-risk early-stage colorectal cancer is worth debating. Treatment selection for large colorectal lesions is discussed based on lesion factor and treatment outcomes.

摘要

对于大肠大病变,内镜下切除比手术更有效且节省成本。如果操作细致,分块切除通常有效,但内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)能完整切除较大病变。对于直肠病变,经肛门内镜显微手术或经肛门微创手术能实现更彻底的全层切除,但ESD对于切除复杂直肠病变也有效。伴有淋巴结清扫的手术切除是浸润性癌的金标准;然而,低风险早期大肠癌的治疗管理值得探讨。基于病变因素和治疗结果讨论了大肠大病变的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Surgery Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Polyps: Making Sense of When to Use Which Approach.大型息肉的手术治疗与内镜下黏膜切除术及内镜下黏膜下剥离术:明确何时采用何种方法
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2019 Oct;29(4):675-685. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
2
Wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading colorectal lesions: a cost-effectiveness analysis.宽视野内镜下黏膜切除术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤的成本效果分析。
Gut. 2018 Nov;67(11):1965-1973. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313823. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
3
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of large distal non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas (MATILDA-trial): rationale and design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial.内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)与内镜下黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗远端大肠广基腺瘤的比较(MATILDA试验):一项多中心随机临床试验的原理与设计
BMC Gastroenterol. 2016 May 26;16(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0468-6.
4
Comparative evaluation of colonoscopy-assisted transanal minimally invasive surgery via glove port and endoscopic submucosal dissection for early rectal tumor.经肛门内镜微创手术与结肠镜辅助经肛门入路微创手术治疗早期直肠肿瘤的对比评估。
Int J Surg. 2017 Jun;42:197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.029. Epub 2017 May 11.
5
AGA Institute Clinical Practice Update: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the United States.AGA 研究所临床实践更新:美国内镜黏膜下剥离术。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(1):16-25.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.041. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
6
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Technical advantages compared to endoscopic mucosal resection and minimally invasive surgery.结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术:与内镜黏膜切除术和微创手术相比的技术优势。
Dig Endosc. 2014 Jan;26 Suppl 1:52-61. doi: 10.1111/den.12196. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
7
Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial.经肛门微创外科手术(TAMIS)与内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗非息肉样直肠病变(TRIASSIC 研究):一项欧洲多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul 13;20(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01367-z.
8
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.与传统的内镜下黏膜切除术相比,对于大型结直肠息肉,水下内镜黏膜切除术的复发率较低,且能更早进行治愈性切除。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4174-4183. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5474-4. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
9
Colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).结直肠内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug;31(4):455-471. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
10
Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments.结直肠肿瘤的内镜切除术技术:最新进展。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 21;25(3):300-307. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i3.300.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements in endoscopic closure techniques for gastrointestinal luminal defects comparative perspectives on OTSC, endo suturing, TTS clips, and X-Tack.胃肠道腔隙缺损内镜闭合技术的进展——OTSC、内镜缝合、TTS夹和X-Tack的比较视角
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Jul 16;87(8):5077-5086. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003571. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Histological prediction and choice of the best resection strategy in front of a colorectal lesion > 2 cm: prospective comparison of endoscopic characterization, non-targeted and targeted biopsies.结直肠病变大于2厘米时的组织学预测及最佳切除策略的选择:内镜特征、非靶向活检与靶向活检的前瞻性比较
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1622-1634. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11501-7. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
3
Predictors for malignant potential and deep submucosal invasion in colorectal laterally spreading tumors.结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤恶性潜能及深层黏膜下浸润的预测因素
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Jul 15;14(7):1337-1347. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i7.1337.
4
Ultrasound Image Features under Decomposition Algorithm to Analyze the Nursing Intervention on Patients with Colon Polyps Undergoing Endoscopic Resection.超声图像特征在分解算法下分析内镜切除术治疗结肠息肉患者的护理干预。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2021 Dec 15;2021:9581568. doi: 10.1155/2021/9581568. eCollection 2021.
5
Advances in gastrointestinal surgical endoscopy.胃肠道外科内镜检查的进展
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Nov 17;72:103041. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103041. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Influence of Old Age on Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis and Survival in Patients With T1 Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.老年对T1期结直肠癌患者淋巴结转移风险及生存的影响:一项基于人群的分析。
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 13;11:706488. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.706488. eCollection 2021.
7
Cost comparisons of endoscopic and surgical resection of stage T1 rectal cancer.T1期直肠癌内镜切除与手术切除的成本比较。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Sep 16;9(10):E1512-E1519. doi: 10.1055/a-1522-8762. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
The Application of Core Needle Biopsy Through the Trocar Hole in the Surgical Operation of Endoscopically Unresectable Giant Colon Polyps: A Systematic Review Study.经皮套管针芯活检在经内镜无法切除的巨大结肠息肉手术治疗中的应用:一项系统评价研究。
Adv Ther. 2021 May;38(5):2662-2672. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01635-8. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
9
Analysis of 234 cases of colorectal polyps treated by endoscopic mucosal resection.234例经内镜黏膜切除术治疗的大肠息肉分析。
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Nov 6;8(21):5180-5187. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i21.5180.
10
Early stage colon cancer: Current treatment standards, evolving paradigms, and future directions.早期结肠癌:当前治疗标准、不断演变的模式及未来方向。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Aug 15;12(8):808-832. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i8.808.