Suppr超能文献

理解救护车向急诊科提前预警中的有效沟通:对英国紧急服务部门的定性研究结果

Understanding good communication in ambulance pre-alerts to the emergency department: findings from a qualitative study of UK emergency services.

作者信息

Sampson Fiona C, O'Hara Rachel, Long Jaqui, Coster Joanne

机构信息

The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e094221. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094221.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Prehospital notifications (pre-alerts) enable emergency department (ED) staff to prepare for the arrival of patients requiring a time-critical response. Effective communication of the pre-alert is key to enabling the ED to prepare appropriately, but evidence on communication practices is lacking. We undertook qualitative research to understand how pre-alert communication may be improved to optimise the ED response for pre-alerted patients.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data collection took place within three UK Ambulance Services and six EDs between August 2022 and April 2023. We undertook semi-structured interviews with 34 ambulance and 40 ED staff and 156 hours non-participation observation of pre-alert practice (143 pre-alerts). Verbatim interview transcripts and observation notes were imported into NVivo and analysed using a thematic approach.

RESULTS

We identified significant variation in how pre-alerts were communicated that influenced how effectively information was transferred. Ambulance and ED staff demonstrated a shared recognition that pre-alerts need to be communicated concisely, but both received minimal training in how to give and receive pre-alerts. Efficient pre-alerting was influenced by clinician experience and seniority. ED and ambulance clinicians following different information-sharing formats sometimes led to interruptions, information loss and tensions, particularly when an early 'headline' clinical concern had not been shared. Ambulance clinicians sometimes questioned the appropriateness of their pre-alert when ED clinicians did not explain the rationale for not giving the expected response (that is, being accepted into a high-priority area of the ED). Additional sources of frustration included technological problems and poor communication of estimated time of arrival and caller/responder identities.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a shared format, including a headline 'cause for concern', may improve the clarity, usefulness and civility of pre-alerts, particularly when the clinician's concern is not obvious from observations. Basic training on how to undertake pre-alerts for both ED and ambulance clinicians may improve understanding of the importance of pre-alert communication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN12652860.

摘要

目的

院前通知(预警报)可使急诊科(ED)工作人员为需要紧急响应的患者的到来做好准备。预警报的有效沟通是使急诊科能够进行适当准备的关键,但目前缺乏关于沟通实践的证据。我们进行了定性研究,以了解如何改进预警报沟通,从而优化急诊科对预警报患者的响应。

设计、设置和参与者:2022年8月至2023年4月期间,在英国的三个救护服务机构和六个急诊科收集数据。我们对34名救护人员和40名急诊科工作人员进行了半结构化访谈,并对143次预警报实践进行了156小时的非参与式观察。逐字记录的访谈转录本和观察笔记被导入NVivo,并采用主题分析法进行分析。

结果

我们发现预警报的沟通方式存在显著差异,这影响了信息传递的有效性。救护人员和急诊科工作人员一致认为预警报需要简洁传达,但双方在如何发出和接收预警报方面接受的培训都很少。高效的预警报受到临床医生经验和资历的影响。遵循不同信息共享格式的急诊科和救护临床医生有时会导致中断、信息丢失和紧张关系,特别是当早期的“头条”临床问题未被共享时。当急诊科临床医生没有解释不给出预期响应(即被接纳到急诊科的高优先级区域)的理由时,救护临床医生有时会质疑他们预警报的适当性。其他令人沮丧的原因包括技术问题以及预计到达时间和呼叫者/响应者身份的沟通不畅。

结论

使用包括“关注原因”头条的共享格式,可能会提高预警报的清晰度、有用性和礼貌性,特别是当从观察中临床医生的关注点不明显时。为急诊科和救护临床医生提供关于如何进行预警报的基础培训,可能会提高对预警报沟通重要性的理解。

试验注册号

ISRCTN12652860。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验