• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推特上关于糖尿病的“何人”与“何事”

The 'who' and 'what' of #diabetes on Twitter.

作者信息

Beguerisse-Díaz Mariano, McLennan Amy K, Garduño-Hernández Guillermo, Barahona Mauricio, Ulijaszek Stanley J

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, UK.

Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2017 Jan 1;3:2055207616688841. doi: 10.1177/2055207616688841. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/2055207616688841
PMID:29942579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6001201/
Abstract

Social media are being increasingly used for health promotion, yet the landscape of users, messages and interactions in such fora is poorly understood. Studies of social media and diabetes have focused mostly on patients, or public agencies addressing it, but have not looked broadly at all of the participants or the diversity of content they contribute. We study Twitter conversations about diabetes through the systematic analysis of 2.5 million tweets collected over 8 months and the interactions between their authors. We address three questions. (1) What themes arise in these tweets? (2) Who are the most influential users? (3) Which type of users contribute to which themes? We answer these questions using a mixed-methods approach, integrating techniques from anthropology, network science and information retrieval such as thematic coding, temporal network analysis and community and topic detection. Diabetes-related tweets fall within broad thematic groups: health information, news, social interaction and commercial. At the same time, humorous messages and references to popular culture appear consistently, more than any other type of tweet. We classify authors according to their temporal 'hub' and 'authority' scores. Whereas the hub landscape is diffuse and fluid over time, top authorities are highly persistent across time and comprise bloggers, advocacy groups and NGOs related to diabetes, as well as for-profit entities without specific diabetes expertise. Top authorities fall into seven interest communities as derived from their Twitter follower network. Our findings have implications for public health professionals and policy makers who seek to use social media as an engagement tool and to inform policy design.

摘要

社交媒体正越来越多地被用于健康促进,但人们对这类平台上的用户、信息和互动情况却知之甚少。关于社交媒体与糖尿病的研究大多聚焦于患者或处理糖尿病问题的公共机构,而没有全面考察所有参与者及其所提供内容的多样性。我们通过系统分析在8个月内收集的250万条推文及其作者之间的互动,来研究推特上有关糖尿病的对话。我们探讨三个问题。(1)这些推文中出现了哪些主题?(2)最具影响力的用户是谁?(3)哪种类型的用户贡献了哪些主题?我们采用混合方法来回答这些问题,整合了人类学、网络科学和信息检索等技术,如主题编码、时间网络分析以及社区和主题检测。与糖尿病相关的推文可归为广泛的主题类别:健康信息、新闻、社交互动和商业。与此同时,幽默信息和对流行文化的提及始终存在,比其他任何类型的推文都多。我们根据作者的时间“中心性”和“权威性”得分对其进行分类。虽然中心性情况随着时间推移是分散且不稳定的,但顶级权威在时间上具有高度持久性,包括与糖尿病相关的博主、倡导团体和非政府组织,以及缺乏特定糖尿病专业知识的营利性实体。顶级权威根据其推特关注者网络可分为七个兴趣社区。我们的研究结果对寻求将社交媒体用作参与工具并为政策设计提供信息的公共卫生专业人员和政策制定者具有启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/901d31025fae/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/d3557d8ade3b/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/99ccf8a0653a/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/cc9ce124a890/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/296e6c740453/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/4f35f5917ff8/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/c39120e101d2/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/0d6d8273651f/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/de9e72c1abad/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/d3739de95652/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/16078638bbda/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/901d31025fae/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/d3557d8ade3b/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/99ccf8a0653a/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/cc9ce124a890/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/296e6c740453/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/4f35f5917ff8/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/c39120e101d2/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/0d6d8273651f/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/de9e72c1abad/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/d3739de95652/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/16078638bbda/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/addb/6001201/901d31025fae/10.1177_2055207616688841-fig11.jpg

相似文献

1
The 'who' and 'what' of #diabetes on Twitter.推特上关于糖尿病的“何人”与“何事”
Digit Health. 2017 Jan 1;3:2055207616688841. doi: 10.1177/2055207616688841. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
2
Analysis of twitter users' sharing of official new york storm response messages.推特用户对纽约官方风暴应对信息分享情况的分析。
Med 2 0. 2014 Mar 20;3(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/med20.3237. eCollection 2014 Jan-Jun.
3
Examining Tweet Content and Engagement of Canadian Public Health Agencies and Decision Makers During COVID-19: Mixed Methods Analysis.研究 COVID-19 期间加拿大公共卫生机构和决策者的推文内容和参与度:混合方法分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 11;23(3):e24883. doi: 10.2196/24883.
4
#Frailty: A snapshot Twitter report on frailty knowledge translation.# 衰弱:关于衰弱知识转化的Twitter即时报告
Australas J Ageing. 2018 Dec;37(4):309-312. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12540. Epub 2018 May 7.
5
Conversations and Medical News Frames on Twitter: Infodemiological Study on COVID-19 in South Korea.推特上的对话与医学新闻框架:韩国新冠肺炎信息流行病学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 5;22(5):e18897. doi: 10.2196/18897.
6
COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.新冠疫情与5G阴谋论:基于推特数据的社交网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19458. doi: 10.2196/19458.
7
Hearing loss on social media: Who is winning hearts and minds?社交媒体上的听力损失问题:谁能赢得人心?
Laryngoscope. 2018 Jun;128(6):1453-1461. doi: 10.1002/lary.26902. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
8
Mapping Individual Differences on the Internet: Case Study of the Type 1 Diabetes Community.映射互联网上的个体差异:1型糖尿病社区案例研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2021 Oct 15;6(4):e30756. doi: 10.2196/30756.
9
Exploring Discussions About Virtual Reality on Twitter to Inform Brain Injury Rehabilitation: Content and Network Analysis.探索 Twitter 上关于虚拟现实的讨论以了解脑损伤康复:内容和网络分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 19;26:e45168. doi: 10.2196/45168.
10
Analyzing Twitter as a Platform for Alzheimer-Related Dementia Awareness: Thematic Analyses of Tweets.将推特作为提高阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆症认知度的平台进行分析:推文的主题分析
JMIR Aging. 2018 Dec 10;1(2):e11542. doi: 10.2196/11542.

引用本文的文献

1
Web and/or MD?: Empirically testing the relationships between internet use and visits to healthcare professionals.网络就医还是实体就医?实证检验互联网使用与就医之间的关系。
Soc Sci Med. 2025 Jul;376:118071. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118071. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
2
Finding polarized communities and tracking information diffusion on Twitter: a network approach on the Irish Abortion Referendum.在推特上寻找极化社区并追踪信息传播:关于爱尔兰堕胎公投的网络方法
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jan 15;12(1):240454. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240454. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Topic modeling and social network analysis approach to explore diabetes discourse on Twitter in India.

本文引用的文献

1
Framing obesity in UK policy from the Blair years, 1997-2015: the persistence of individualistic approaches despite overwhelming evidence of societal and economic factors, and the need for collective responsibility.1997年至2015年布莱尔执政期间英国政策框架下的肥胖问题:尽管有大量证据表明存在社会和经济因素,但个人主义方法仍持续存在,且需要承担集体责任。
Obes Rev. 2016 May;17(5):397-411. doi: 10.1111/obr.12386.
2
Lost in transportation: Information measures and cognitive limits in multilayer navigation.迷失在交通中:多层导航中的信息测度与认知局限。
Sci Adv. 2016 Feb 19;2(2):e1500445. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500445. eCollection 2016 Feb.
3
运用主题建模和社交网络分析方法探索印度推特上关于糖尿病的讨论。
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Feb 12;7:1329185. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1329185. eCollection 2024.
4
Who tweets what about personalised medicine? Promises and concerns from Twitter discussions in Denmark.谁在推特上发布了关于个性化医疗的哪些内容?丹麦推特讨论中的承诺与担忧。
Digit Health. 2023 Apr 20;9:20552076231169832. doi: 10.1177/20552076231169832. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Search Term Identification Methods for Computational Health Communication: Word Embedding and Network Approach for Health Content on YouTube.计算健康传播中的搜索词识别方法:YouTube上健康内容的词嵌入与网络方法
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Aug 30;10(8):e37862. doi: 10.2196/37862.
6
Identifying Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Twitter and Learning From Their Personal Experience: Retrospective Cohort Study.在 Twitter 上识别炎症性肠病患者并从他们的个人经验中学习:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 2;24(8):e29186. doi: 10.2196/29186.
7
Extraction of Explicit and Implicit Cause-Effect Relationships in Patient-Reported Diabetes-Related Tweets From 2017 to 2021: Deep Learning Approach.2017年至2021年患者报告的糖尿病相关推文显式和隐式因果关系提取:深度学习方法
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jul 19;10(7):e37201. doi: 10.2196/37201.
8
Characterization of Vaccine Tweets During the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Outbreak in the United States: Topic Modeling Analysis.美国新冠疫情早期疫苗推文的特征:主题建模分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2021 Sep 14;1(1):e25636. doi: 10.2196/25636. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
9
Re-evaluating standards of human subjects protection for sensitive health data in social media networks.重新评估社交媒体网络中敏感健康数据的人类受试者保护标准。
Soc Networks. 2021 Oct;67:41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2019.10.010. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
10
Using Twitter Comments to Understand People's Experiences of UK Health Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Thematic and Sentiment Analysis.利用推特评论了解新冠疫情期间英国人对英国医疗保健的体验:主题和情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 25;23(10):e31101. doi: 10.2196/31101.
Preconception counselling resource for women with diabetes.
糖尿病女性孕前咨询资源
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Oct 12;4(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u209621.w3984. eCollection 2015.
4
What Do People Like to "Share" About Obesity? A Content Analysis of Frequent Retweets About Obesity on Twitter.人们喜欢“分享”关于肥胖的哪些内容?对推特上关于肥胖的频繁转发内容的一项内容分析。
Health Commun. 2016;31(2):193-206. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.940675. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
5
Social media fingerprints of unemployment.失业的社交媒体印记。
PLoS One. 2015 May 28;10(5):e0128692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128692. eCollection 2015.
6
Interest communities and flow roles in directed networks: the Twitter network of the UK riots.定向网络中的兴趣社区与流动角色:英国骚乱的推特网络
J R Soc Interface. 2014 Dec 6;11(101):20140940. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0940.
7
Scientific community. Who are the science stars of Twitter?
Science. 2014 Sep 19;345(6203):1440-1. doi: 10.1126/science.345.6203.1440.
8
Social Media and Public Outreach: A Physician Primer.社交媒体与公众宣传:医生入门指南
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Jul;36(7):1223-4. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4100. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
9
Using friends as sensors to detect global-scale contagious outbreaks.利用朋友作为传感器来检测全球范围的传染性爆发。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 9;9(4):e92413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092413. eCollection 2014.
10
Local health department use of twitter to disseminate diabetes information, United States.美国地方卫生部门利用推特传播糖尿病信息。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 May 2;10:E70. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120215.