Fice Jason B, Blouin Jean-Sébastien, Siegmund Gunter P
a University of British Columbia , School of Kinesiology , Vancouver , British Columbia , Canada.
b Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health and Institute for Computing , Information and Cognitive Systems , Vancouver , British Columbia , Canada.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(6):637-643. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1493582. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
A rotated head posture at the time of a rear-end impact is associated with a higher risk of acute and chronic whiplash injury. The objective of this study was to quantify the amplitude and duration of rotated head postures observed in drivers during naturalistic driving.
Twenty volunteers (14 males: 36 ± 12 years, 6 females: 27 ± 5 years) drove a 2010 Subaru Impreza on public roads while their 3D head angular position relative to the car was recorded using inertial measurement units. An experimenter rode in the passenger seat (right side) and logged when subjects performed one of 6 head movements: Bilateral shoulder and side mirror checks, looking at the rearview mirror, and looking at the front seat passenger. Video of the subjects was used to confirm the logged head movements and identify movements that the experimenter missed. The duration and amplitude of all 6 head movements were tabulated and then compared between periods when the car was moving and when the car was stationary.
During a 68 ± 5-min drive, subjects performed a median (range) of 15 (5-39) left shoulder checks, 82.5 (29-167) left mirror checks, 40.5 (10-168) rearview mirror checks, 27.5 (3-113) right mirror checks, 60 (0-185) passenger looks, and 12.5 (1-28) right shoulder checks. Peak yaw angles of the head relative to the vehicle for these 6 movements averaged -81.5°, -34.3°, 16.2°, 42.1°, 58.2°, and 84.3°, respectively. Drivers spent a larger proportion of time in nonneutral postures when the vehicle was stopped (17.5%) compared to moving (8.2%) (Z = 3.92, P < .0001). Drivers also moved their head further from neutral during the movements when the car was stationary compared to moving (t = 5.90, P < .0001).
Drivers use larger and longer duration head movements when stationary than when driving. Given an increased risk of whiplash injury for initially rotated head postures, these findings provide a possible explanation for why drivers are more likely to be injured when hit from behind while their vehicle is stationary. Further, the head postures characterized in this study can be used as initial conditions in volunteer and computational studies to improve our understanding of why nonneutral head postures are associated with increased whiplash injury risk.
在追尾碰撞时头部旋转姿势与急慢性挥鞭样损伤的较高风险相关。本研究的目的是量化在自然驾驶过程中观察到的驾驶员头部旋转姿势的幅度和持续时间。
20名志愿者(14名男性,年龄36±12岁;6名女性,年龄27±5岁)在公共道路上驾驶一辆2010款斯巴鲁翼豹汽车,同时使用惯性测量单元记录他们头部相对于汽车的三维角位置。一名实验人员坐在乘客座位(右侧),记录受试者进行6种头部动作之一的时间:双侧肩部和侧视镜检查、看后视镜、看前排乘客。使用受试者的视频来确认记录的头部动作,并识别实验人员遗漏的动作。将所有6种头部动作的持续时间和幅度制成表格,然后比较汽车行驶时和静止时的情况。
在68±5分钟的驾驶过程中,受试者进行左肩部检查的中位数(范围)为15次(5 - 39次),左视镜检查82.5次(29 - 167次),后视镜检查40.5次(10 - 168次),右视镜检查27.5次(3 - 113次),看乘客60次(0 - 185次),右肩部检查12.5次(1 - 28次)。这6种动作中头部相对于车辆的峰值偏航角平均分别为-81.5°、-34.3°、16.2°、42.1°、58.2°和84.3°。与汽车行驶时(8.2%)相比,车辆停止时驾驶员处于非中立姿势的时间比例更大(17.5%)(Z = 3.92,P <.0001)。与汽车行驶时相比,车辆静止时驾驶员在动作过程中头部偏离中立位置的距离也更远(t = 5.90,P <.0001)。
驾驶员在车辆静止时比行驶时使用更大幅度和更长持续时间的头部动作。鉴于初始旋转头部姿势会增加挥鞭样损伤的风险,这些发现为为什么驾驶员在车辆静止时被追尾更易受伤提供了一种可能的解释。此外,本研究中表征的头部姿势可作为志愿者和计算研究的初始条件,以增进我们对非中立头部姿势为何与增加挥鞭样损伤风险相关的理解。