• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们选择的旗舰物种对吗?澳大利亚人最喜爱的鸟类物种及其特征。

Are we choosing the right flagships? The bird species and traits Australians find most attractive.

机构信息

Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.

Coastal Seas Ecology Team, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Penicuik, Midlothian, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jun 26;13(6):e0199253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199253. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0199253
PMID:29944681
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6019765/
Abstract

Understanding what people like about birds can help target advocacy for bird conservation. However, testing preferences for characteristics of birds is methodologically challenging, with bias difficult to avoid. In this paper we test whether preferred characteristics of birds in general are shared by the individual bird species the same people nominate as being those they consider most attractive. We then compare these results with the birds which appear most frequently in the imagery of conservation advocates. Based on a choice model completed by 638 general public respondents from around Australia, we found a preference for small colourful birds with a melodious call. However, when the same people were asked which five birds they found most attractive, 48% named no more than three, mostly large well-known species. Images displayed by a leading Australian bird conservation organisation also favoured large colourful species. The choice model results suggest conservation advocates can promote a much wider range of bird types as flagships, particularly smaller species that might otherwise be neglected.

摘要

了解人们喜欢鸟类的哪些方面可以帮助确定鸟类保护的宣传重点。然而,测试人们对鸟类特征的偏好具有挑战性,因为很难避免偏见。在本文中,我们测试了一般来说人们喜欢的鸟类特征是否与他们认为最有吸引力的鸟类物种相同。然后,我们将这些结果与保护主义者形象中出现频率最高的鸟类进行了比较。基于 638 名来自澳大利亚各地的普通公众完成的选择模型,我们发现人们更喜欢色彩鲜艳、叫声悦耳的小型鸟类。然而,当同样的人被问到他们认为最有吸引力的五种鸟是什么时,48%的人只提到了不超过三种,而且大多是广为人知的大型物种。一家领先的澳大利亚鸟类保护组织展示的图片也偏爱大型彩色物种。选择模型的结果表明,保护主义者可以推广更多种类的鸟类作为旗舰物种,特别是那些否则可能被忽视的小型物种。

相似文献

1
Are we choosing the right flagships? The bird species and traits Australians find most attractive.我们选择的旗舰物种对吗?澳大利亚人最喜爱的鸟类物种及其特征。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 26;13(6):e0199253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199253. eCollection 2018.
2
Threatened bird valuation in Australia.澳大利亚受威胁鸟类的估值
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 23;9(6):e100411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100411. eCollection 2014.
3
Bird naming systems by Akan people in Ghana follow scientific nomenclature with potentials for conservation monitoring.加纳阿坎人使用的鸟类命名系统遵循科学命名法,具有用于保护监测的潜力。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2015 Oct 31;11:75. doi: 10.1186/s13002-015-0062-y.
4
Using a choice experiment and birder preferences to guide bird-conservation funding.利用选择实验和观鸟者偏好来指导鸟类保护资金的投入。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Aug;31(4):818-827. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12849. Epub 2017 May 29.
5
Leaky doors: Private captivity as a prominent source of bird introductions in Australia.漏洞之门:私人圈养成为澳大利亚鸟类引入的一个突出源头。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172851. eCollection 2017.
6
Using a systematic approach to select flagship species for bird conservation.采用系统方法选择鸟类保护旗舰物种。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Feb;28(1):269-77. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12142. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
7
Drivers of Bird Species Richness within Moist High-Altitude Grasslands in Eastern South Africa.南非东部湿润高海拔草原鸟类物种丰富度的驱动因素
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 5;11(10):e0162609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162609. eCollection 2016.
8
Large-Scale Range Collapse of Hawaiian Forest Birds under Climate Change and the Need for 21st Century Conservation Options [corrected].气候变化下夏威夷森林鸟类的大规模分布范围缩减及21世纪保护方案的必要性[已修正]
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 28;10(10):e0140389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140389. eCollection 2015.
9
Urban Bird Feeding: Connecting People with Nature.城市鸟类喂养:让人与大自然相连。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 18;11(7):e0158717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158717. eCollection 2016.
10
Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.澳大利亚公众对新医疗技术资金投入的偏好:离散选择法与轮廓案例最佳-最差尺度法的比较
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jul;34(5):638-54. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14526640. Epub 2014 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Six-decade research bias towards fancy and familiar bird species.对奇特且为人熟知的鸟类物种长达六十年的研究偏差。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Apr;292(2044):20242846. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2846. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
2
Human-Caused High Direct Mortality in Birds: Unsustainable Trends and Ameliorative Actions.人类活动导致鸟类的高直接死亡率:不可持续的趋势及改善行动。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Dec 31;15(1):73. doi: 10.3390/ani15010073.
3
What drives our aesthetic attraction to birds?是什么驱使我们对鸟类产生审美吸引力?

本文引用的文献

1
Explicit Not Implicit Preferences Predict Conservation Intentions for Endangered Species and Biomes.明确而非隐含的偏好预测对濒危物种和生物群落的保护意图。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 30;12(1):e0170973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170973. eCollection 2017.
2
Using a choice experiment and birder preferences to guide bird-conservation funding.利用选择实验和观鸟者偏好来指导鸟类保护资金的投入。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Aug;31(4):818-827. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12849. Epub 2017 May 29.
3
Familiarity breeds content: assessing bird species popularity with culturomics.
NPJ Biodivers. 2023 Sep 27;2(1):20. doi: 10.1038/s44185-023-00026-2.
4
Selection of Flagship Species and Their Use as Umbrellas in Bird Conservation: A Case Study in Lishui, Zhejiang Province, China.旗舰物种的选择及其在鸟类保护中作为保护伞物种的应用:以中国浙江省丽水市为例
Animals (Basel). 2023 May 31;13(11):1825. doi: 10.3390/ani13111825.
5
The iratebirds Citizen Science Project: a Dataset on Birds' Visual Aesthetic Attractiveness to Humans.愤怒鸟公民科学项目:鸟类对人类视觉美学吸引力的数据集
Sci Data. 2023 May 19;10(1):297. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02169-0.
6
Assessing the aesthetic attractivity of European butterflies: A web-based survey protocol.评估欧洲蝴蝶的美学吸引力:一项基于网络的调查方案。
PLoS One. 2023 May 11;18(5):e0283360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283360. eCollection 2023.
7
WASP: the World Archives of Species Perception.WASP:物种感知世界档案馆。
Database (Oxford). 2023 Feb 28;2023. doi: 10.1093/database/baad003.
8
Evaluating the use of semi-structured crowdsourced data to quantify inequitable access to urban biodiversity: A case study with eBird.评估半结构化众包数据在量化城市生物多样性获取不公平方面的应用:以 eBird 为例的研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 9;17(11):e0277223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277223. eCollection 2022.
9
Identifying engaging bird species and traits with community science observations.利用社区科学观测识别引人入胜的鸟类物种和特征。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 19;119(16):e2110156119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2110156119. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
熟悉滋生喜爱:用文化组学评估鸟类物种的受欢迎程度。
PeerJ. 2016 Feb 25;4:e1728. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1728. eCollection 2016.
4
Biological, ecological, conservation and legal information for all species and subspecies of Australian bird.澳大利亚所有鸟类物种和亚种的生物学、生态学、保护和法律信息。
Sci Data. 2015 Nov 10;2:150061. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.61. eCollection 2015.
5
Going cheap: determinants of bird price in the Taiwanese pet market.追求低价:台湾宠物市场鸟类价格的决定因素
PLoS One. 2015 May 27;10(5):e0127482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127482. eCollection 2015.
6
Human preferences for colorful birds: Vivid colors or pattern?人类对色彩斑斓鸟类的偏好:鲜艳的颜色还是图案?
Evol Psychol. 2015 Apr 29;13(2):339-59. doi: 10.1177/147470491501300203.
7
Toward a psychology of human-animal relations.迈向人类与动物关系心理学。
Psychol Bull. 2015 Jan;141(1):6-47. doi: 10.1037/a0038147. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
8
Determination of non-market values to inform conservation strategies for the threatened Alistana-Sanabresa cattle breed.确定非市场价值以指导濒危的阿利斯塔纳-萨纳布雷萨牛品种的保护策略。
Animal. 2014 Aug;8(8):1373-81. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114000676. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
9
Using a systematic approach to select flagship species for bird conservation.采用系统方法选择鸟类保护旗舰物种。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Feb;28(1):269-77. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12142. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
10
Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods.基于网络的调查作为传统邮寄方式的替代方法。
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jan;90(1):284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.09.011. Epub 2007 Dec 21.