Suppr超能文献

认知需求回避的神经系统。

Neural systems of cognitive demand avoidance.

机构信息

Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, United States.

Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, United States; Carney Institute for Brain Sciences, Brown University, United States.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 4;123:41-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jun 23.

Abstract

Cognitive effort is typically aversive, evident in people's tendency to avoid cognitively demanding tasks. The 'cost of control' hypothesis suggests that engagement of cognitive control systems of the brain makes a task costly and the currency of that cost is a reduction in anticipated rewards. However, prior studies have relied on binary hard versus easy task subtractions to manipulate cognitive effort and so have not tested this hypothesis in "dose-response" fashion. In a sample of 50 participants, we parametrically manipulated the level of effort during fMRI scanning by systematically increasing cognitive control demands during a demand-selection paradigm over six levels. As expected, frontoparietal control network (FPN) activity increased, and reward network activity decreased, as control demands increased across tasks. However, avoidance behavior was not attributable to the change in FPN activity, lending only partial support to the cost of control hypothesis. By contrast, we unexpectedly observed that the de-activation of a task-negative brain network corresponding to the Default Mode Network (DMN) across levels of the cognitive control manipulation predicted the change in avoidance. In summary, we find partial support for the cost of control hypothesis, while highlighting the role of task-negative brain networks in modulating effort avoidance behavior.

摘要

认知努力通常是令人不快的,这表现在人们倾向于避免认知要求高的任务。“控制成本”假说认为,大脑的认知控制系统的参与会使任务变得昂贵,而成本的货币是预期回报的减少。然而,先前的研究依赖于二元的难与易任务减法来操纵认知努力,因此没有以“剂量反应”的方式检验这一假说。在 50 名参与者的样本中,我们通过在 fMRI 扫描期间系统地增加需求选择范式中的认知控制需求,在六个水平上参数化地操纵努力水平。正如预期的那样,随着任务控制需求的增加,额顶控制网络(FPN)的活动增加,而奖励网络的活动减少。然而,回避行为不能归因于 FPN 活动的变化,这只是对控制成本假说的部分支持。相比之下,我们出人意料地观察到,在认知控制操作的各个水平上,与默认模式网络(DMN)相对应的任务负性脑网络的去激活预测了回避行为的变化。总之,我们发现控制成本假说得到了部分支持,同时强调了任务负性脑网络在调节努力回避行为中的作用。

相似文献

1
Neural systems of cognitive demand avoidance.认知需求回避的神经系统。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 4;123:41-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
2
Neural Mechanisms for Adaptive Learned Avoidance of Mental Effort.适应学习避免心理努力的神经机制。
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 7;38(10):2631-2651. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1995-17.2018. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
4
Adaptive control and the avoidance of cognitive control demands across development.自适应控制与认知控制需求在发展过程中的避免。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 4;123:152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.029. Epub 2018 May 1.
7
Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying subjective valuation of effort costs.努力成本主观评估背后的神经计算机制。
PLoS Biol. 2017 Feb 24;15(2):e1002598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002598. eCollection 2017 Feb.
9
Neural systems underlying the learning of cognitive effort costs.认知努力成本学习的神经基础。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Aug;21(4):698-716. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00893-x. Epub 2021 May 7.
10
Policy abstraction as a predictor of cognitive effort avoidance.政策抽象作为认知努力回避的预测指标。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Dec;152(12):3440-3458. doi: 10.1037/xge0001449. Epub 2023 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Hubs and interaction: the brain's meta-loop.枢纽与相互作用:大脑的元循环
Cereb Cortex. 2025 Mar 6;35(3). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf035.
3
Cognitive Control.认知控制
Annu Rev Psychol. 2025 Jan;76(1):167-195. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-022024-103901. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
6
Wagers for work: Decomposing the costs of cognitive effort.为工作打赌:分解认知努力的成本。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Apr 29;20(4):e1012060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012060. eCollection 2024 Apr.
7
Humans do not avoid reactively implementing cognitive control.人类不会主动避免执行认知控制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 Jun;50(6):587-604. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001207. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
8
If psychedelics heal, how do they do it?如果迷幻药具有治疗作用,它们是如何做到的呢?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jan 9;121(2):e2321906121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2321906121. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
10
Need for cognition moderates the relief of avoiding cognitive effort.认知需求调节避免认知努力的缓解作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0287954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287954. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

2
Functional network changes and cognitive control in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中的功能网络变化与认知控制
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 May 2;15:161-170. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.05.001. eCollection 2017.
3
Coordination of Brain-Wide Activity Dynamics by Dopaminergic Neurons.多巴胺能神经元对全脑活动动态的协调作用
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017 Feb;42(3):615-627. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.151. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
9
Ventral striatum and the evaluation of memory retrieval strategies.腹侧纹状体与记忆检索策略的评估
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Sep;26(9):1928-48. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00596. Epub 2014 Feb 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验