Sanefuji Wakako, Haryu Etsuko
Faculty of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Faculty of Education, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 12;9:955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00955. eCollection 2018.
This study investigated the relationship between children's abilities to understand causal sequences and another's false belief. In Experiment 1, we tested 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-old children ( = 28, 28, 27, and 27, respectively) using false belief and picture sequencing tasks involving mechanical, behavioral, and psychological causality. Understanding causal sequences in mechanical, behavioral, and psychological stories was related to understanding other's false beliefs. In Experiment 2, children who failed the initial false belief task ( = 50) were reassessed 5 months later. High scorers in the sequencing of the psychological stories in Experiment 1 were more likely to pass the standard false belief task than were the low scorers. Conversely, understanding causal sequences in the mechanical and behavioral stories in Experiment 1 did not predict passing the false belief task in Experiment 2. Thus, children may understand psychological causality before they are able to use it to understand false beliefs.
本研究调查了儿童理解因果序列的能力与他人错误信念之间的关系。在实验1中,我们使用涉及机械、行为和心理因果关系的错误信念和图片排序任务,对3岁、4岁、5岁和6岁的儿童(分别为28名、28名、27名和27名)进行了测试。在机械、行为和心理故事中理解因果序列与理解他人的错误信念有关。在实验2中,对最初未能通过错误信念任务的50名儿童在5个月后重新进行了评估。实验1中心理故事排序得分高的儿童比得分低的儿童更有可能通过标准错误信念任务。相反,实验1中机械和行为故事中因果序列的理解并不能预测实验2中错误信念任务的通过情况。因此,儿童在能够利用心理因果关系来理解错误信念之前,可能就已经理解了心理因果关系。