• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人复杂性阑尾炎阑尾切除术后浅表手术部位感染的临床预测评分。

Clinical prediction score for superficial surgical site infection after appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis.

机构信息

1Department of Surgery, Chonburi hospital, Chonburi, Thailand.

2Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University Hospital, Pathum thani, Thailand.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Jun 18;13:23. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0186-1. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1186/s13017-018-0186-1
PMID:29946346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6006790/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Superficial surgical site infection (SSI) is common after appendectomy. This study aims to determine a clinical prediction score for SSI after appendectomy in complicated appendicitis.

METHODS

Data from randomized controlled trial of delayed versus primary wound closures in complicated appendicitis was used. Nineteen patient- and operative-related predictors were selected in the logit model. Clinical prediction score was then constructed using coefficients of significant predictors. Risk stratification was done by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Bootstrap technique was used to internal validate the score.

RESULTS

Among 607 patients, the SSI incidence was 8.7% (95% CI 6.4, 11.2). Four predictors were significantly associated with SSI, i.e., presence of diabetes, incisional length > 7 cm, fecal contamination, and operative time > 75 min with the odds ratio of 2.6 (95% CI 1.2, 5.9), 2.8 (1.5, 5.4), 3.6 (1.9, 6.8), and 3.4 (1.8, 6.5), respectively. Clinical prediction score ranged from 0 to 4.5 with its discrimination concordance (C) statistic of 0.74 (95% CI 0.66, 0.81). Risk stratification classified patients into very low, low, moderate, and high risk groups for SSI when none, one, two, and more than two risk factors were presented with positive likelihood ratio of 1.00, 1.45, 3.32, and 9.28, respectively. A bootstrap demonstrated well calibration and thus good internal validation.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes, incisional length, fecal contamination, and operative time could be used to predict SSI with acceptable discrimination. This clinical risk prediction should be useful in prediction of SSI. However, external validation should be performed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT01659983), registered August 8, 2012.

摘要

背景

阑尾切除术后常见浅表手术部位感染(SSI)。本研究旨在确定复杂阑尾炎阑尾切除术后 SSI 的临床预测评分。

方法

使用复杂阑尾炎延迟与一期伤口闭合的随机对照试验的数据。在对数模型中选择了 19 个患者和手术相关的预测因素。然后使用有意义的预测因素的系数构建临床预测评分。通过接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析进行风险分层。使用 bootstrap 技术对内部分数进行验证。

结果

在 607 例患者中,SSI 发生率为 8.7%(95%CI6.4-11.2)。有 4 个预测因素与 SSI 显著相关,即存在糖尿病、切口长度>7cm、粪便污染和手术时间>75min,其比值比分别为 2.6(95%CI1.2-5.9)、2.8(1.5-5.4)、3.6(1.9-6.8)和 3.4(1.8-6.5)。临床预测评分范围为 0 至 4.5,其判别一致性(C)统计量为 0.74(95%CI0.66-0.81)。风险分层将患者分为 SSI 极低、低、中、高风险组,当不存在、存在 1、2 和>2 个危险因素时,阳性似然比分别为 1.00、1.45、3.32 和 9.28。bootstrap 验证表明具有良好的校准,因此内部验证良好。

结论

糖尿病、切口长度、粪便污染和手术时间可用于预测 SSI,具有可接受的判别能力。这种临床风险预测对于预测 SSI 应该是有用的。然而,应该进行外部验证。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov(ID NCT01659983),注册于 2012 年 8 月 8 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4a3/6006790/2df3bf9948f7/13017_2018_186_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4a3/6006790/2df3bf9948f7/13017_2018_186_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4a3/6006790/2df3bf9948f7/13017_2018_186_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical prediction score for superficial surgical site infection after appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis.成人复杂性阑尾炎阑尾切除术后浅表手术部位感染的临床预测评分。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Jun 18;13:23. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0186-1. eCollection 2018.
2
Development and validation of risk prediction score for incisional surgical site infection after appendectomy.开发和验证阑尾切除术后切口手术部位感染风险预测评分。
Updates Surg. 2021 Dec;73(6):2189-2197. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00944-x. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
3
Thickness of subcutaneous fat is a risk factor for incisional surgical site infection in acute appendicitis surgery: a prospective study.皮下脂肪厚度是急性阑尾炎手术切口部位感染的一个危险因素:一项前瞻性研究。
BMC Surg. 2021 Jan 4;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-01029-7.
4
Tailoring the operative approach for appendicitis to the patient: a prediction model from national surgical quality improvement program data.根据国家外科质量改进计划的数据,为阑尾炎患者量身定制手术方法:一个预测模型。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jan;216(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.08.035. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
5
Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals.222 家 ACS NSQIP 医院中腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的结局比较。
Surgery. 2010 Oct;148(4):625-35; discussion 635-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.025. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
6
Delayed versus primary closure to minimize risk of surgical-site infection for complicated appendicitis: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial using counterfactual prediction modeling.延迟缝合与一期缝合以降低复杂性阑尾炎手术部位感染风险:一项使用反事实预测模型的随机试验的二次分析
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Mar;45(3):322-328. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.214. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
7
Comparison of Superficial Surgical Site Infection Between Delayed Primary Versus Primary Wound Closure in Complicated Appendicitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.复杂性阑尾炎中延期一期缝合与一期缝合切口浅层感染的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2018 Apr;267(4):631-637. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002464.
8
Association between body composition and incisional surgical site infection after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎后体成分与切口手术部位感染的关系。
BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02541-w.
9
Surgical site infection after laparoscopic and open appendectomy: a multicenter large consecutive cohort study.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术后手术部位感染:一项多中心大型连续队列研究
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1384-93. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3809-y. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
10
[Post-appendectomy surgical site infection: overall rate and type according to open/laparoscopic approach].[阑尾切除术后手术部位感染:根据开放/腹腔镜手术方式的总体发生率及类型]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2014 Feb;32(2):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A Retrospective Cohort Study on Postoperative Surgical Site Infections Following Open Appendectomy: Predictive Factors and Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model.一项关于开放性阑尾切除术后手术部位感染的回顾性队列研究:预测因素及风险预测模型的建立与验证
Cureus. 2025 Jun 10;17(6):e85697. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85697. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Comparison of Surgical Site Infections in Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术手术部位感染的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究
Cureus. 2025 Mar 13;17(3):e80530. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80530. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Predictors of complicated appendicitis among patients presented to public referral hospitals in Harari region, Eastern Ethiopia: a case-control study.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Superficial Surgical Site Infection Between Delayed Primary Versus Primary Wound Closure in Complicated Appendicitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.复杂性阑尾炎中延期一期缝合与一期缝合切口浅层感染的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2018 Apr;267(4):631-637. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002464.
2
Risk factors and prediction model for inpatient surgical site infection after major abdominal surgery.腹部大手术后住院患者手术部位感染的危险因素及预测模型
J Surg Res. 2017 Sep;217:153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 May 11.
3
Cost and Consequences of Surgical Site Infections: A Call to Arms.
埃塞俄比亚东部哈拉里地区公立转诊医院患者中复杂性阑尾炎的预测因素:一项病例对照研究
Surg Pract Sci. 2022 Mar 14;9:100072. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100072. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Association between body composition and incisional surgical site infection after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎后体成分与切口手术部位感染的关系。
BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02541-w.
5
Antimicrobial stewardship program for gastrointestinal surgeries at a Vietnamese tertiary hospital.越南一家三级医院胃肠道手术的抗菌药物管理计划
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 17;11:1345698. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1345698. eCollection 2024.
6
Impact of preoperative factors and waiting time on post-appendectomy complications: a retrospective study.术前因素及等待时间对阑尾切除术后并发症的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2024 Feb 21;13(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00365-z.
7
Delayed versus primary closure to minimize risk of surgical-site infection for complicated appendicitis: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial using counterfactual prediction modeling.延迟缝合与一期缝合以降低复杂性阑尾炎手术部位感染风险:一项使用反事实预测模型的随机试验的二次分析
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Mar;45(3):322-328. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.214. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
8
Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update.预防急性护理医院手术部位感染的策略:2022 更新版。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 May;44(5):695-720. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.67. Epub 2023 May 4.
9
Risk factors and prediction model for inpatient surgical site infection after elective abdominal surgery.择期腹部手术后住院患者手术部位感染的危险因素及预测模型
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Mar 27;15(3):387-397. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i3.387.
10
Is it necessary to use specimen retrieval bag for reducing surgical site infection in laparoscopic appendectomy?A randomized controlled trial.在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中使用标本取出袋是否可以减少手术部位感染?一项随机对照试验。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Feb;29(2):203-211. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.97828.
手术部位感染的成本与后果:紧急呼吁
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 May/Jun;18(4):451-454. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.072. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
4
A systematic review of clinical effectiveness of wound edge protector devices in reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.一项关于伤口边缘保护装置在降低腹部手术患者手术部位感染方面临床效果的系统评价。
Updates Surg. 2017 Mar;69(1):21-28. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0415-2. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
5
Surgical site infection: comparing surgeon versus patient self-report.手术部位感染:外科医生报告与患者自我报告的比较
J Surg Res. 2016 May 1;202(1):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.12.039. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
6
Prediction of surgical site infection after colorectal surgery.结直肠手术后手术部位感染的预测
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Apr 1;44(4):450-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.10.024.
7
Evidence Based Emergency Medicine; Part 4: Pre-test and Post-test Probabilities and Fagan's nomogram.循证急诊医学;第4部分:检验前概率、检验后概率与费根氏 nomogram图
Emerg (Tehran). 2016 Winter;4(1):48-51.
8
Review of Subcutaneous Wound Drainage in Reducing Surgical Site Infections after Laparotomy.剖腹术后皮下伤口引流对降低手术部位感染的综述
Surg Res Pract. 2015;2015:715803. doi: 10.1155/2015/715803. Epub 2015 Dec 13.
9
Diabetes and Risk of Surgical Site Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.糖尿病与手术部位感染风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;37(1):88-99. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.249. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
10
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.疑似阑尾炎患者的腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:随机对照试验的Meta分析的系统评价
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 15;15:48. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0277-3.