Suppr超能文献

在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中使用标本取出袋是否可以减少手术部位感染?一项随机对照试验。

Is it necessary to use specimen retrieval bag for reducing surgical site infection in laparoscopic appendectomy?A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University Faculty of Medicine, Tokat-Türkiye.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Feb;29(2):203-211. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.97828.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to investigate the comparison the effects of the extraction of specimen by using a specimen retrieval bag (SRB) or direct extraction through trochar in terms of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy.

METHODS

A total of 165 patients were randomly allocated into two groups. A SRB was used in 77 patients (Group 1, 46.7%) and not used in 88 patients (Group 2, 53.3%). Demographics, comorbid diseases, laboratory results, preoperative diameter of appendix, intraoperative observations, intraoperative procedures, hospitalization times, SSIs, pathology results, culture results, and findings of the patients who developed complications and the treatments given to the patients due to complications during the post-operative period were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 33.95 SD 13.25 (min-max: 18-78) years. No significant difference was observed in the demographics, hospitalization times, distribution of the incidence rates of diabetes mellitus, perioperative perforation, perioperative fluid/abscess, drain insertion, aspiration-irrigation, superficial incisional SSI, drainage requirement, leakage, positive culture results, and post-operative intra-abdominal infection (p>0.05) between the groups. Neutrophil and leukocyte values were statistically significantly different between the groups (p=0.044 and p=0.012, respectively). There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of the complicated appendicitis (p=0.040). There was no significant difference in terms of the positive culture results and incidence of post-operative intra-abdominal infection between the patients in Group 1 and Group 2 in both the complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis groups (p>0.05). The difference between the patients in Group 1 and Group 2 regarding the incidence of superficial incisional SSI was significant in the uncomplicated appendicitis group (p=0.037), whereas not significant in the complicated appendicitis group (p=1.000). In the multivariate model, only perioperative perforation was observed to be the effective parameter on post-operative intra-abdominal infection at the p<0.05 level (p=0.045).

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study revealed that the use of SRB does not prevent microbial seeding in patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy; therefore, it was concluded that using SRB is not associated with SSI at laparoscopic appendectomy.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较在接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者中,使用标本回收袋(SRB)提取标本与直接通过 trochar 提取标本在手术部位感染(SSI)方面的效果。

方法

将 165 名患者随机分为两组。77 名患者(第 1 组,46.7%)使用了 SRB,88 名患者(第 2 组,53.3%)未使用 SRB。记录患者的人口统计学资料、合并症、实验室结果、阑尾术前直径、术中观察、术中操作、住院时间、SSI、病理结果、培养结果、并发症发生患者的情况以及术后期间因并发症给予患者的治疗。

结果

患者的平均年龄为 33.95±13.25 岁(最小-最大:18-78 岁)。两组在人口统计学资料、住院时间、糖尿病发病率、围手术期穿孔、围手术期积液/脓肿、引流管插入、抽吸冲洗、浅表切口 SSI、引流需求、漏液、阳性培养结果和术后腹腔感染方面无显著差异(p>0.05)。两组中性粒细胞和白细胞值存在统计学显著差异(p=0.044 和 p=0.012)。两组在复杂阑尾炎方面有显著差异(p=0.040)。在复杂和非复杂阑尾炎组中,第 1 组和第 2 组患者的阳性培养结果和术后腹腔感染发生率无显著差异(p>0.05)。在非复杂阑尾炎组中,第 1 组和第 2 组患者的浅表切口 SSI 发生率存在显著差异(p=0.037),而在复杂阑尾炎组中无显著差异(p=1.000)。在多变量模型中,只有围手术期穿孔被观察到是术后腹腔感染的有效参数(p<0.05,p=0.045)。

结论

本研究结果表明,在接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者中,使用 SRB 并不能防止微生物播种;因此,我们得出结论,在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中使用 SRB 与 SSI 无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4292/10198332/689e1dfd4f09/TJTES-29-203-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验