Choudhari Nikhil S, Badakere Swathi Vallabh, Richhariya Ashutosh, Chittajallu Sai Naga Sri Harsha, Senthil Sirisha, Garudadri Chandra Sekhar
VST Glaucoma Centre, Dr. Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Engineering Group-Srujana, Dr. Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Jun 22;7(3):19. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.3.19. eCollection 2018 Jun.
To investigate the mechanism of action and consistency in flow characteristics of the Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) under simulated physiological conditions in-vitro and to evaluate whether resistance during priming has any effect on performance of the device.
Each newly opened AGV device was connected to a digital manometer and was primed with normal saline. The device was then placed in a saline bath and connected to an open manometer, a digital manometer, and an infusion pump. Saline was infused at a rate of 3 μL/min for 24 hours. Digital manometer readings were recorded at 4 Hz.
Data obtained from 9 devices are presented as medians (ranges). The priming pressure was 1130 (835, 1625) mm Hg. Pressure versus time curves showed two distinct phases; transient and steady phases. The transient phase peak pressure was 24 (13, 45) mm Hg. In the steady phase, opening and closing pressures were 13 (10, 17) and 7 (4, 9) mm Hg, respectively; the valve leaflets briefly opened every 73.9 (51, 76.6) minutes and the fluctuation of pressure (difference between opening and closing pressures) was 6 (3, 9) mm Hg. The Spearman correlation coefficient between priming and opening and priming and closing pressure was ρ = -0.13 ( = 0.72) and ρ = -0.36 ( = 0.33), respectively.
The device showed functionality like a valve. The resistance during priming did not affect opening and closing pressures of the AGV. This study showed variable in vitro performance of the AGV.
These laboratory findings might, at least partly, explain the variability in the clinical outcome of the device.
研究艾哈迈德青光眼引流阀(AGV)在体外模拟生理条件下的作用机制和血流特性的一致性,并评估灌注过程中的阻力是否对该装置的性能有任何影响。
将每个新开封的AGV装置连接到数字压力计并用生理盐水灌注。然后将该装置置于盐浴中,并连接到开口压力计、数字压力计和输液泵。以3μL/分钟的速率输注生理盐水24小时。以4Hz记录数字压力计读数。
从9个装置获得的数据以中位数(范围)表示。灌注压力为1130(835,1625)mmHg。压力与时间曲线显示出两个不同的阶段;瞬态和稳态阶段。瞬态阶段的峰值压力为24(13,45)mmHg。在稳态阶段,打开和关闭压力分别为13(10,17)和7(4,9)mmHg;瓣膜小叶每73.9(51,76.6)分钟短暂打开一次,压力波动(打开和关闭压力之间的差值)为6(3,9)mmHg。灌注与打开压力以及灌注与关闭压力之间的Spearman相关系数分别为ρ = -0.13(P = 0.72)和ρ = -0.36(P = 0.33)。
该装置表现出类似瓣膜的功能。灌注过程中的阻力不影响AGV的打开和关闭压力。本研究显示了AGV在体外的性能存在差异。
这些实验室研究结果可能至少部分解释了该装置临床结果的变异性。